Role of Uterine Artery Doppler Study Between 11 and 14 Weeks as a Predictor of Preeclampsia
Karpagam Rk,Karthik Krishna Ramakrishnan,Dhivya Gunasekaran,Arun Aram,Paarthipan Natarajan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.63591
2024-07-01
Cureus
Abstract:Introduction Preeclampsia is a serious complication marked by antepartum hemorrhage, resulting in severe maternal and fetal complications. Predicting this condition using placental dysfunction assessments, such as uterine artery Doppler ultrasound, is challenging due to the placenta's evolving structural and biochemical characteristics throughout different stages of pregnancy. Objectives To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the uterine artery Doppler Pulsatility Index (PI) and Resistive Index (RI) in predicting preeclampsia. To compare the Doppler ultrasound measurements between normal pregnancies and those that develop preeclampsia. To assess the diagnostic accuracy of uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in predicting gestational hypertension in addition to preeclampsia. Methodology Conducted as a prospective study, 116 antenatal mothers with computed gestational ages and scan gestational ages between 11 and 14 weeks, and a previous history of preeclampsia were included. Subjects with chronic hypertension or multiple gestations were excluded. Participants underwent uterine artery Doppler screening, during which the PI and RI were measured upon obtaining three consecutive similar waveforms, and the mean PI of the left and right arteries was calculated. The outcomes of patients with normal pregnancies and those who developed preeclampsia were compared. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results The mean PI among participants was 1.75 (±0.38), with a range from 1 to 2.75. The mean RI was 0.58 (±0.08), ranging from 0.45 to 0.8. The cutoff for the mean PI in predicting preeclampsia was 2.27, which showed a sensitivity of 92.9%, specificity of 97.1%, PPV of 81.47%, NPV of 99.01%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 96.59% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.982). The cutoff for the mean RI for predicting preeclampsia was 0.695, with a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 98%, PPV of 85.47%, NPV of 98.04%, and diagnostic accuracy of 96.52% (AUC: 0.965). In predicting gestational hypertension, the cutoff for the mean PI was 1.975, with a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 82.9%, PPV of 17.41%, NPV of 98.92%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.78% (AUC: 0.848). The cutoff for the mean RI in predicting gestational hypertension was 0.615, showing a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 80.2%, PPV of 15.4%, NPV of 98.89%, and diagnostic accuracy of 80.19% (AUC: 0.767). Conclusion The research demonstrated that aberrant readings in uterine Doppler ultrasound, specifically in the PI and RI, possess strong overall validity in forecasting the occurrence of preeclampsia.