Near-infrared photoresponse in single walled carbon nanotube/polymer composite films

Biddut K. Sarker,M. Arif,Saiful I. Khondaker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0912.4215
2009-12-31
Abstract:We present a near-infrared photoresponse study of single-walled carbon nanotube/poly(3-hexylthiophene)-block-polystyrene polymer (SWCNT/P3HT-b-PS) composite films for different loading ratios of SWCNT in the polymer matrix. Compared to the pure SWCNT film, the photoresponse [(light current - dark current)/dark current] is much larger in the SWCNT/polymer composite films. The photoresponse is up to 157% when SWCNTs are embedded in P3HT-b-PS while for a pure SWCNT film it is only 40%. We also show that the photocurrent strongly depends on the position of the laser spot with maximum photocurrent occurring at the metal-film interface. We explain the photoresponse due to exciton dissociations and charge carrier separation caused by a Schottky barrier at the metallic electrode - SWCNT interface
Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: to study the photoelectric response characteristics of single - walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and poly(3 - hexylthiophene) - block - polystyrene (P3HT - b - PS) polymer composite films under near - infrared light. Specifically, the author aims to explore whether the photoelectric responses of these composites are better than those of pure SWCNT films under different SWCNT loading ratios, and to explain the physical mechanisms behind them. ### Research Background and Problems 1. **Controversy over the Photoelectric Characteristics of SWCNT**: - SWCNT has wide applications in nano - electronic and optical devices due to its unique mechanical, optical, and electrical properties. - However, there is controversy over the origin of the photoconductivity of SWCNT, and different studies have given different explanations. For example, some studies show that the near - infrared (NIR) light response can be explained by the exciton model, while others believe it is caused by thermal effects or molecular oxygen desorption. 2. **Advantages of SWCNT/Polymer Composites**: - New composites with multi - functionality and adjustable characteristics can be prepared by embedding SWCNT in a polymer matrix. - These composites can not only absorb light in the visible range but also in the near - infrared region, so they have potential applications in large - area photoelectric devices (such as fast optical switches, photodetectors, and solar cells). ### Core Problems of the Paper - **Reasons for the Enhancement of Photoelectric Response**: Why is the photoelectric response of SWCNT/P3HT - b - PS composite films much higher than that of pure SWCNT films under near - infrared light? - **Position Dependence**: Why is the photocurrent the largest at the metal - film interface? - **Mechanism Explanation**: What mechanism exactly causes this enhanced photoelectric response? Is it a thermal effect or exciton dissociation? ### Main Findings - **Significantly Enhanced Photoelectric Response**: When SWCNT is embedded in P3HT - b - PS, the photoelectric response can be as high as 157%, while that of pure SWCNT films is only 40%. - **Position Dependence**: The photocurrent strongly depends on the position of laser irradiation, and the maximum photocurrent occurs at the metal - film interface. - **Mechanism Explanation**: By comparing the magnitude of resistance change and photoelectric response, the author excluded the possibility of thermal effects and believed that the photoelectric response was caused by exciton dissociation at the metal - SWCNT interface. ### Conclusion This study provides new possibilities for the application of SWCNT/polymer composites in low - cost infrared photodetectors and position - sensitive detectors. Through experimental verification, the author has proven that the exciton dissociation mechanism is the main reason for the photoelectric response in these composites, rather than thermal effects.