Abstract:Nativists inspired by Chomsky are apt to provide arguments with the following general form: languages exhibit interesting generalizations that are not suggested by casual (or even intensive) examination of what people actually say; correspondingly, adults (i.e., just about anyone above the age of four) know much more about language than they could plausibly have learned on the basis of their experience; so absent an alternative account of the relevant generalizations and speakers' (tacit) knowledge of them, one should conclude that there are substantive “universal” principles of human grammar and, as a result of human biology, children can only acquire languages that conform to these principles. According to Pullum and Scholz, linguists need not suppose that children are innately endowed with “specific contingent facts about natural languages.” But Pullum and Scholz don't consider the kinds of facts that really impress nativists. Nor do they offer any plausible acquisition scenarios that would culminate in the acquisition of languages that exhibit the kinds of rich and interrelated generalizations that are exhibited by natural languages. As we stress, good poverty-of-stimulus arguments are based on specific principles – confirmed by drawing on (negative and crosslinguistic) data unavailable to children – that help explain a range of independently established linguistic phenomena. If subsequent psycholinguistic experiments show that very young children already know such principles, that strengthens the case for nativism; and if further investigation shows that children sometimes “try out” constructions that are unattested in the local language, but only if such constructions are attested in other human languages, then the case for nativism is made stronger still. We illustrate these points by considering an apparently disparate – but upon closer inspection, interestingly related – cluster of phenomena involving: negative polarity items, the interpretation of ‘or’, binding theory, and displays of Romance and Germanic constructions in Child-English.

A Random Matrix Approach to Language Acquisition

Cortical Tracking of Constituent Structure in Language Acquisition

The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: Theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis

Simulation of language competition by physicists

Computational approach to the emergence and evolution of language - evolutionary naming game model

Why language acquisition is a snap

The Architecture of a Biologically Plausible Language Organ

Opening the black box of language acquisition

A Phylogenetic Model of the Evolution of Discrete Matrices for the Joint Inference of Lexical and Phonological Language Histories

[First language acquisition research and theories of language acquisition]

Evaluating Neural Language Models as Cognitive Models of Language Acquisition

Language Acquisition in Computers

One model for the learning of language

Language Acquisition Meets Language Evolution

General Reflections on Interactions between Cross-Disciplinary Theories of Human Language Development

A Probabilistic Generative Model of Linguistic Typology

A Theory of Language Learning

The Biological Origin of Linguistic Diversity

Investigating Critical Period Effects in Language Acquisition through Neural Language Models

Searching for Structure: Investigating Emergent Communication with Large Language Models

What Artificial Neural Networks Can Tell Us About Human Language Acquisition