Abstract:Embryonic development is driven by spatial patterns of gene expression that determine the fate of each cell in the embryo. While gene expression is often highly erratic, embryonic development is usually exceedingly precise. In particular, gene expression boundaries are robust not only against intra-embryonic fluctuations such as noise in gene expression and protein diffusion, but also against embryo-to-embryo variations in the morphogen gradients, which provide positional information to the differentiating cells. How development is robust against intra- and inter-embryonic variations is not understood. A common motif in the gene regulation networks that control embryonic development is mutual repression between pairs of genes. To assess the role of mutual repression in the robust formation of gene expression patterns, we have performed large-scale stochastic simulations of a minimal model of two mutually repressing gap genes in Drosophila, hunchback (hb) and knirps (kni). Our model includes not only mutual repression between hb and kni, but also the stochastic and cooperative activation of hb by the anterior morphogen Bicoid (Bcd) and of kni by the posterior morphogen Caudal (Cad), as well as the diffusion of Hb and Kni between neighboring nuclei. Our analysis reveals that mutual repression can markedly increase the steepness and precision of the gap gene expression boundaries. In contrast to other mechanisms such as spatial averaging and cooperative gene activation, mutual repression thus allows for gene-expression boundaries that are both steep and precise. Moreover, mutual repression dramatically enhances their robustness against embryo-to-embryo variations in the morphogen levels. Finally, our simulations reveal that diffusion of the gap proteins plays a critical role not only in reducing the width of the gap gene expression boundaries via the mechanism of spatial averaging, but also in repairing patterning errors that could arise because of the bistability induced by mutual repression.

Morphogen Profiles Can Be Optimised to Buffer Against Noise

When it Pays to Rush: Interpreting Morphogen Gradients Prior to Steady-State

Shaping a Morphogen Gradient for Positional Precision

Optimal control of gene regulatory networks for morphogen-driven tissue patterning

Morphogenesis by coupled regulatory networks: Reliable control of positional information and proportion regulation

Probing Intrinsic Properties of a Robust Morphogen Gradient in Drosophila

Dynamics of positional information in the vertebrate neural tube

Parameterizing Cell-to-cell Regulatory Heterogeneities Via Stochastic Transcriptional Profiles

Hysteresis and noise floor in gene expression optimised for persistence against lethal events

Stable developmental patterns of gene expression without morphogen gradients

Morphogens in the evolution of size, shape and patterning

Precision of morphogen-driven tissue patterning during development is enhanced through contact-mediated cellular interactions

Reply to: Assessing the precision of morphogen gradients in neural tube development

Noise Drives Sharpening of Gene Expression Boundaries in the Zebrafish Hindbrain

Precision of the Dpp gradient

Dynamics of morphogen source formation in a growing tissue

Buffering and Amplifying Transcriptional Noise During Cell Fate Specification

Reverse engineering morphogenesis through Bayesian optimization of physics-based models

Mutual Repression Enhances the Steepness and Precision of Gene Expression Boundaries

Illuminating morphogen and patterning dynamics with optogenetic control of morphogen production