Abstract:We study online job scheduling on a processor that can vary its speed dynamically to manage its power. We attempt to extend the recent success in analyzing total unweighted flow time plus energy to total weighted flow time plus energy. We first consider the non-clairvoyant setting where the size of a job is only known when the job finishes. We show an online algorithm WLAPS that is 8α2-competitive for weighted flow time plus energy under the traditional power model, which assumes the power P(s) to run the processor at speed s to be sα for some α> 1. More interestingly, for any arbitrary power function P(s), WLAPS remains competitive when given a more energy-efficient processor; precisely, WLAPS is \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$16(1+\frac{1}{\epsilon})^2$\end{document}-competitive when using a processor that, given the power P(s), can run at speed (1 + ε)s for some ε> 0. Without such speedup, no non-clairvoyant algorithm can be O(1)-competitive for an arbitrary power function [8]. For the clairvoyant setting (where the size of a job is known at release time), previous results on minimizing weighted flow time plus energy rely on scaling the speed continuously over time [5-7]. The analysis of WLAPS has inspired us to devise a clairvoyant algorithm LLB which can transform any continuous speed scaling algorithm to one that scales the speed at discrete times only. Under an arbitrary power function, LLB can give an \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$4(1+\frac{1}{\epsilon})$\end{document}-competitive algorithm using a processor with (1 + ε)-speedup.

Nonclairvoyant Speed Scaling for Flow and Energy

Non-clairvoyant Speed Scaling for Weighted Flow Time

An Experimental Comparison of Speed Scaling Algorithms with Deadline Feasibility Constraints

Speed Scaling with Multiple Servers Under A Sum Power Constraint

Non-clairvoyant Weighted Flow Time Scheduling on Different Multi-processor Models

Scheduling Parallelizable Jobs Online to Minimize the Maximum Flow Time

Relating Electric Vehicle Charging to Speed Scaling with Job-Specific Speed Limits

Scheduling for Weighted Flow Time and Energy with Rejection Penalty

Load Balancing and Speed Scaling Interaction in Processor-Sharing Systems with Exponential Power Functions.

Non-clairvoyant Scheduling of Coflows

Learning Augmented Energy Minimization via Speed Scaling

Online Primal-Dual for Non-linear Optimization with Applications to Speed Scaling

Slow Down & Sleep for Profit in Online Deadline Scheduling

Energy-saving fast-forward scaling

Online Scheduling via Gradient Descent for Weighted Flow Time Minimization

Modeling Performance and Energy trade-offs in Online Data-Intensive Applications

Online Non-Preemptive Scheduling to Minimize Weighted Flow-time on Unrelated Machines

Accelerating Distributed Optimization via Fixed-time Convergent Flows: Extensions to Non-convex Functions and Consistent Discretization

Online Cloud Resource Allocation and Pricing with Server Speed Scaling

Saath: Speeding up CoFlows by Exploiting the Spatial Dimension

Scheduling to Minimize Energy and Flow Time in Broadcast Scheduling