Abstract:The topic of climate change has aroused increasingly widespread concern around the world. Under the agreement at the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), covened in Paris, France (Paris Agreement), which requires all Parties to undertake emission reductions, the developing countries who were once exempted from emission reduction obligations are now becoming more and more important. This study focuses on mitigation actions in China, the largest carbon emitter, as well as the largest developing country in the world. Specifically, we examine Chinese Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) projects. The objective is to compare the reduction efficiency of three types of projects: simple abatement and completely renewable energy alternative projects at the supply side and demand side projects. From market-induced carbon leakage point of view, a dual market equilibrium model was built, with results showing that the key factors affecting the leakage rates are price elasticities of both demand and supply sides and market share parameters. In most cases, renewable energy alternative projects show the least leakage rate while demand side projects show the highest. Sensitivity analysis finds that leakage rates for the three types of projects are more sensitive to price elasticity parameters than market share parameters. Moreover, factors <span class="InlineEquation">\( {E}_c^{de} \)</span> (electricity price elasticity of coal demand from coal-fired generation) and <span class="InlineEquation">\( {E}_e^d \)</span> (electricity price elasticity of electricity demand) affect not only the leakage rate of each project but also the comparative results between them. Although our study is based on China, the theoretical analysis is applicable in other regional voluntary emission reduction markets around the world. So, a systematic approach to comprehensively analyze the issue is summarized, based on which, we recommend two mitigation strategies to cope with the issue in offset projects in order to give managerial insights for the government. Firstly, the calculated leakage rates for different types of projects provide a new perspective to evaluate various offset projects, thus helping consider project types for priority validation. Secondly, we suggest to establish an accurate and classified discount coefficient system according to the project types to deal with the issue; the sensitivity analysis is helpful to find the most influential factors. A top-down approach to implement the strategy is proposed.

Does emission trading lead to carbon leakage in China? Direction and channel identifications

Do China's pilot emissions trading schemes lead to domestic carbon leakage? Perspective from the firm relocation

Beggar-thy-neighbor: Carbon leakage within China's pilot emissions trading schemes

Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China’s Regional Carbon Emission Trading

Does emission trading system lead to reverse investment leakage: Evidence from Chinese listed firms

Identifying the Industrial Sectors at Risk of Carbon Leakage in China

Market-induced carbon leakage in China’s certified emission reduction projects

Emissions Reduction Effects and Carbon Leakage Risks of Carbon Emissions Trading Policy: An Empirical Study Based on the Spatial Durbin Model

Has the Carbon Emission Trading Scheme Induced Investment Leakage in China? Firm-level Evidence from China's Stock Market

Examining the Impact and Influencing Channels of Emission Trading Pilot Markets in China

Carbon Leakage Scrutiny in ETS and Non-Ets Industrial Sectors in China

The narrowing gap in developed and developing country emission intensities reduces global trade’s carbon leakage

Evaluation of effectiveness of China's carbon emissions trading scheme in carbon mitigation

Emission Leakage and the Effectiveness of Regional Environmental Regulation in China

Spatial emission reduction effects of China’s carbon emissions trading: quasi-natural experiments and policy spillovers

Analysis of emission reduction effects of carbon trading: Market mechanism or government intervention?

Carbon Emission Trading Scheme, Carbon Emissions Reduction and Spatial Spillover Effects: Quasi-Experimental Evidence From China

China ’ s CO 2 Emission Peaking and Leakage-- A Decomposition for Direct and Indirect Carbon Leakage

China’s Carbon Emission Trading Pilot Policy and China’s Export Technical Sophistication: Based on DID Analysis

Can China’s policy of carbon emission trading promote carbon emission reduction?

Carbon endowment and trade-embodied carbon emissions in global value chains: Evidence from China