U.S. livestock producer interest in alternatives to compensation programs for wolf depredation

Rae Nickerson,Dana Hoag,Paul H. Evangelista,Rebecca Niemiec,Alex Few,Stewart W Breck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2024.2414880
2024-10-27
Human Dimensions of Wildlife
Abstract:Interest in financial compensation programs for wolf-livestock conflict in the United States is growing, yet we know little about livestock producer perceptions concerning existing programs or potential alternatives. We surveyed producers to ask about challenges they perceive in applying for compensation and/or concerns about program rules and procedures. We then looked at whether they would choose alternatives like cost sharing for conflict management and habitat leasing rather than compensation. We found mixed levels of satisfaction with existing compensation, with about 75% of respondents believing that indirect losses caused from predator-induced stress are as, or more, financially damaging than when wolves kill livestock (depredation). Commonly selected perceptions included dissatisfaction with the depredation reporting and confirmation processes, inadequate compensation, and a lack of trust and satisfaction surrounding depredation confirmations. We found compensation was preferred to cost sharing and habitat leases.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?