Mechanical stimulation and electrophysiological monitoring at subcellular resolution reveals differential mechanosensation of neurons within networks

Krishna Chaitanya Kasuba,Alessio Paolo Buccino,Julian Bartram,Benjamin M. Gaub,Felix J. Fauser,Silvia Ronchi,Sreedhar Saseendran Kumar,Sydney Geissler,Michele M. Nava,Andreas Hierlemann,Daniel J. Müller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01609-1

IF: 38.3

2024-02-21

Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract:A growing consensus that the brain is a mechanosensitive organ is driving the need for tools that mechanically stimulate and simultaneously record the electrophysiological response of neurons within neuronal networks. Here we introduce a synchronized combination of atomic force microscopy, high-density microelectrode array and fluorescence microscopy to monitor neuronal networks and to mechanically characterize and stimulate individual neurons at piconewton force sensitivity and nanometre precision while monitoring their electrophysiological activity at subcellular spatial and millisecond temporal resolution. No correlation is found between mechanical stiffness and electrophysiological activity of neuronal compartments. Furthermore, spontaneously active neurons show exceptional functional resilience to static mechanical compression of their soma. However, application of fast transient ( ∼ 500 ms) mechanical stimuli to the neuronal soma can evoke action potentials, which depend on the anchoring of neuronal membrane and actin cytoskeleton. Neurons show higher responsivity, including bursts of action potentials, to slower transient mechanical stimuli ( ∼ 60 s). Moreover, transient and repetitive application of the same compression modulates the neuronal firing rate. Seemingly, neuronal networks can differentiate and respond to specific characteristics of mechanical stimulation. Ultimately, the developed multiparametric tool opens the door to explore manifold nanomechanobiological responses of neuronal systems and new ways of mechanical control.

materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand how individual neurons in a neural network perceive and respond to mechanical stimuli, and how this mechanical sensitivity affects their electrophysiological activities. Specifically, the researchers developed a technique that synchronously combines atomic force microscopy (AFM), high - density microelectrode arrays (HD - MEA) and fluorescence microscopy to mechanically characterize and stimulate individual neurons with nanometer - precision and piconewton - force resolution, and simultaneously monitor their electrophysiological activities with subcellular - spatial and millisecond - temporal resolution.

The main objectives of the study include:
1. **Explore the mechanical sensitivity of neurons**: By applying different types of mechanical stimuli (such as static compression and transient mechanical stimuli), study the neurons' responses to these stimuli, especially whether these stimuli can trigger action potentials.
2. **Analyze the relationship between mechanical stimuli and electrophysiological activities**: Study whether there is a correlation between the mechanical stiffness of neurons and their electrophysiological activities, and how this relationship affects the functions of neurons.
3. **Understand the impact of mechanical stimuli on neural networks**: Explore how mechanical stimuli affect the spontaneous activities in neural networks, including the firing rate of neurons and the morphological characteristics of action potentials.

Through these studies, the authors hope to reveal how neurons communicate through mechanical signals and provide a basis for the development of new mechanical control methods in the future.