Validation of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument in People Living with COPD
Astrid Blondeel,Heleen Demeyer,Victoria Alcaraz-Serrano,Sara C Buttery,Joren Buekers,Nikolaos Chynkiamis,Alícia Josa-Culleré,Laura Delgado-Ortiz,Anja Frei,Lies Glorie,Elena Gimeno-Santos,Nick Hopkinson,Emily Hume,Carl-Philipp Jansen,Anne Kirsten,Sarah Koch,Dimitrios Megaritis,Paulien Mellaerts,Milo A Puhan,Lynn Rochester,Ioannis Vogiatzis,Henrik Watz,Marieke Wuyts,Judith Garcia-Aymerich,Thierry Troosters
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-432OC
2024-09-23
Abstract:Background: Disability and loss of function are acknowledged as important problems for people living with COPD, but there is a need for validated tools to assess them. Research question: The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) was originally validated for community-dwelling older adults. The full instrument has not been validated to assess disability and loss of function in people with COPD. Methods: People with COPD from 6 European countries completed the LLFDI as part of an observational study. Its validity was assessed in terms of 1) levels and distribution of LLFDI domain and subdomain scores; 2) floor and ceiling effects; 3) instrument structure (3 domains, 7 subdomains) by confirmatory factor analysis; and 4) construct validity by (i) convergent validity, based on Spearman correlation with COPD-relevant and related constructs (functional exercise capacity, severity of dyspnea and COPD-related health status), and (ii) known-groups validity, based on the distribution of LLFDI scores according to COPD-meaningful groups (disease severity, age groups and use of a walking aid). Results: The study included 605 participants (aged 68±8 years, 37% female, FEV1 54±20%pred.). Most had impaired disability and function levels. We observed no floor effects and a ceiling effect in only two subdomains. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a moderate model fit for all LLFDI domains. Most of the correlations met our hypotheses (73%), with moderate to strong correlations for function domain (r min-max 0.25-0.70), followed by disability-limitation domain (r min-max 0.15-0.54), and weakest correlations in the disability-frequency domain (r min-max 0.04-0.41). The disability-limitation and function domains differed by disease severity, age group and use of a walking aid. The disability-frequency domain differed by disease severity and use of a walking aid, but not by age groups. Conclusion: The LLFDI, a valid patient-reported outcome to investigate disability and function, has proven good construct validity in people with COPD.