"Going vaccine hunting": Multilevel influences on COVID-19 vaccination among racialized sexual and gender minority adults—a qualitative study
Peter A. NewmanDuy Anh DinhNotisha MassaquoiCharmaine C. WilliamsAshley Lacombe-DuncanSuchon TepjanThabani Nyonia Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work,University of Toronto,Toronto,Ontario,Canadab Faculty of Health Sciences,Queen's University,Kingston,Ontario,Canadac Department of Health and Society,University of Toronto,Scarborough,Ontario,Canadad School of Social Work,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor,MI,USAe VOICES-Thailand Foundation,Chiang Mai,Thailandf School of Social Work,Faculty of Health,Dalhousie University,Halifax,Nova Scotia,Canada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2301189
2024-02-14
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Abstract:High levels of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy have been reported among Black and Latinx populations, with lower vaccination coverage among racialized versus White sexual and gender minorities. We examined multilevel contexts that influence COVID-19 vaccine uptake, barriers to vaccination, and vaccine hesitancy among predominantly racialized sexual and gender minority individuals. Semi-structured online interviews explored perspectives and experiences around COVID-19 vaccination. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, uploaded into ATLAS.ti, and reviewed using thematic analysis. Among 40 participants (mean age, 29.0 years [SD, 9.6]), all identified as sexual and/or gender minority, 82.5% of whom were racialized. COVID-19 vaccination experiences were dominated by structural barriers: systemic racism, transphobia and homophobia in healthcare and government/public health institutions; limited availability of vaccination/appointments in vulnerable neighborhoods; absence of culturally-tailored and multi-language information; lack of digital/internet access; and prohibitive indirect costs of vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy reflected in uncertainties about a novel vaccine amid conflicting information and institutional mistrust was integrally linked to structural factors. Findings suggest that the uncritical application of "vaccine hesitancy" to unilaterally explain undervaccination among marginalized populations risks conflating structural and institutional barriers with individual-level psychological factors, in effect placing the onus on those most disenfranchised to overcome societal and institutional processes of marginalization. Rather, disaggregating structural determinants of vaccination availability, access, and institutional stigma and mistrust from individual attitudes and decision-making that reflect vaccine hesitancy, may support 1) evidence-informed interventions to mitigate structural barriers in access to vaccination, and 2) culturally-informed approaches to address decisional ambivalence in the context of structural homophobia, transphobia, and racism.
immunology,biotechnology & applied microbiology