Abstract:Cold snare resection is now recommended for adenomatous polyps <10 mm in size, and there is a growing body of evidence supporting its use for polyps larger than this [1] [2]. For sessile serrated lesions, cold snare resection has been repeatedly demonstrated to be successful, regardless of the lesion size, with or without submucosal injection, possibly owing to the ease of transection and the lack of submucosal fibrosis within sessile serrated lesions [3]. In this issue of Endoscopy , do Espirito Santo et al. report a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1556 patients from seven randomized controlled trials that compared cold snare resection versus cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (C-EMR) using submucosal injection for colonic polyps and found there was no difference in the rates of complete resection, en bloc resection, and adverse events, although C-EMR did have a longer procedure time [4]. Submucosal injection relies on the principle of creating a submucosal cushion to protect the underlying muscle layer from injury or, even worse, perforation. Owing to the reduced depth of resection and the lack of electrocautery use in cold snaring, muscle injuries and perforations are extraordinarily rare. Cold snare resection is known for its higher rate of immediate bleeding than resection using electrocautery, but almost all bleeding after cold snare resection can be stopped with conservative techniques, such as applying tamponade with the waterjet or the scope itself, without the need for clips. The overwhelming safety of cold snare resection should inspire confidence in endoscopists – submucosal injection is likely not needed to reduce the procedure risks for any size of polyp. "As cold snare resection sees expanding indications, submucosal injection may be left out in the cold and only brought in when turning on the heat." If there is no difference between the adverse events for cold resection, why lift? Possibly the answer is to delineate the borders of the lesion to ensure complete resection. The majority of the polyps in this meta-analysis were 10 mm. Additionally, one may use the pressurized waterjet to expand the defect, which can allow for easier inspection of the margins. More studies are needed to understand how submucosal injection affects complete resection for polyps >10 mm. When performing cold snare resection, one should ensure an adequate depth of resection. Additionally, because of the safety of cold snaring, there should be no hesitation in resecting a wide rim of normal tissue around the defect, in an effort to completely eliminate any polyp tissue and reduce possible recurrence. Adequate technique is vital for successful cold snare resection to ensure complete resection, including having the lesion at 5–6 o'clock, placing the snare over the polyp with an adequate rim of normal tissue, anchoring the shaft of the snare so as to prevent slippage of the snare toward the polyp during snare closure, and then resecting. Studies of incomplete resection and high polyp recurrence rates when using cold snaring should also focus on ensuring adequate technique among all of the participating endoscopists. With the proliferation of techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and full-thickness resection, there is a growing emphasis on and ability to perform en bloc resection. Given that all widely available dedicated cold snares are approximately 10 mm, it is not feasible to perform en bloc resection on lesions larger than this, while ensuring an adequate rim of normal tissue. Instead of bundling tissue and possibly having to "pull" it through by applying tension outside the scope, frequently leading to a submucosal cord, which arguably may increase the risk of residual polyp tissue or complications [5], cold snare resection of polyps >10 mm should be undertaken in a piecemeal fashion, with adequate depth and surrounding normal tissue also removed. Malignancy in colonic polyps can often be identified by surface features and morphology. The risk of cancer in polyps in the range 10–19 mm is rare [6]. Even some polyps >20 mm, such as those that are granular or classified as Paris IIa/IIb, have a low risk of submucosal invasion [7]. Beyond the use of submucosal injection or lesions not for cold snare resection, we should also be asking about the limits of cold snare resection in general, given its safety profile compared with other techniques. More studies are needed to understand which large adenomatous lesions in the colon can be routinely resected with cold snare resection and whether submucosal injection is needed. The article by do E -Abstract Truncated-

Cold Snare Polypectomy With or Without Submucosal Injection for Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Impact of Submucosal Saline Injection During Cold Snare Polypectomy for Colorectal Polyps Sized 3-9 Mm: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy and Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy versus Cold Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Resecting 3–10 mm Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Different endoscopic treatments for small colorectal polyps: A systematic review, pair-wise, and network meta-analysis

Effect of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps

The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

A clinical study of cold snare resection for large colorectal polyps

Cold Snare Polypectomy for Large Sessile Colonic Polyps: a Single-Center Experience.

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Cold Snare Versus Hot Snare in Treatment for 10–19 Mm Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Protocol of a Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Study

Cold endoscopic mucosal resection versus cold snare polypectomy for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A Comparison of Incomplete Resection Rate of Large and Small Colorectal Polyps by Cold Snare Polypectomy

Comparison of complete resection rates in cold snare polypectomy using two different wire diameter snares: A randomized controlled study

Cold snare polypectomy reduced delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with conventional hot polypectomy: a propensity score-matching analysis

Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial

Will submucosal injection for colonic polyps get left out in the cold?

Bleeding Risk of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Measuring 10 mm or Less: Subgroup Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial

[A Comparative Study of Cold Snare and Hot Snare Resection of Small Colorectal Polyps].

An international polypectomy practice survey