Quantitative pulmonary perfusion in acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Jacob V. Hansen,Mette W. Poulsen,Jens E. Nielsen‐Kudsk,Mannudeep K. Kalra,Mads D. Lyhne,Asger Andersen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12445
2024-11-10
Pulmonary Circulation
Abstract:Current methods for quantifying perfusion from computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) often rely on semi‐quantitative scoring systems and requires an experienced evaluator. Few studies report on absolute quantitative variables derived from the images, and the methods are varied with mixed results. Dual‐energy CTPA (DE‐CTPA) enables automatic quantification of lung and lobar perfusion with minimal user interaction by utilizing machine learning based software. We aimed to evaluate differences in DE‐CTPA derived quantitative perfusion variables between patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This retrospective, single‐center, observational study included 162 adult patients diagnosed with PE (n = 81) or CTEPH (n = 81) and scanned using dual‐energy CT between 2020 and 2023. Mann–Whitney U tests and permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) were used for comparative analyses. We found whole lung perfusion blood volume to be lower (p
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?