Analyzing Korean Public Health Centers' Infectious Disease Disaster Response Experiences with a Focus on Business Continuity
Eun Kyoung Yun,Jeong-Won Han,Jung Ok Kim,Sungmo Jung,Jeongeun Cha,Keunhee Yoo,Soyoon Min,Boeun Yang,Eun Yun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s448382
2024-04-05
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Abstract:Eun Kyoung Yun, Jeong-Won Han, Jung Ok Kim, Sungmo Jung, Jeongeun Cha, Keunhee Yoo, Soyoon Min, Boeun Yang College of nursing science, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Correspondence: Jeong-Won Han, College of Nursing Science, Kyung Hee University, 26, Kyunghee-daero, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 02447, Republic of Korea, Tel/Fax +82-2-961-2123, Email Objective: This study aims to provide basic data for establishing strategies to maintain the core functions of health centers, and enable an effective response to emergency tasks in the event of future infectious disease disasters. Methods: The participants were 41 workers from two public health centers in Seoul. They all had prior experience in responding to the early and middle stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected through Focus Group Discussions, and then analyzed using the deductive method of content analysis. Results: The participants' experiences during the infectious disease disaster crisis were examined through ten categories: governance and coordination, information management, human resources, essential medical supplies and equipment, infrastructure, administration, finance and logistics, community engagement and risk communication, delivery of essential services, security, and additional considerations for vulnerable populations. The analysis of the results made it apparent that new systems and policies were imperative for responding appropriately to the concerns and experiences of the public healthcare center staff, and for improving the response to future epidemics. Conclusion: We found that to prepare for infectious disaster situations in the future, it is necessary for health centers to establish a mid- to long-term business continuity plan to ensure the continuation and stability of their operations. Additionally, it was found that health professionals in public health centers also believe in the necessity of education and training programs on disaster preparedness, based on Business Continuity Planning proposed by the World Health Organization. They deem these essential to sustain routine tasks for the management of the health of local community residents during outbreaks of novel infectious diseases in the future. Keywords: public health, disaster crisis, qualitative research A public health center is a public institution established in accordance with local health laws; it supports the health, disease management, and hygiene practices of the local residents of a particular area. 1 While conducting screening tests, epidemiological investigations, self-quarantine management, and operating vaccination, and residential treatment centers in response to COVID-19, public health centers in Korea had to introduce new tasks. 2 Following the enactment of the National Health Promotion Act in 1995, Korean public health centers switched their focus to health promotion projects. 3,4 These functional and structural changes significantly enhanced Korean health centers' readiness and agility to provide healthcare for patients with chronic diseases and the vulnerable, while the readiness to respond to new infectious diseases such as COVID-19 remained relatively low. 5 There was social concern about suspending routine work at public health centers. 3 Consequently, public health centers and medical institutions in Korean communities were instructed to incorporate Business Continuity Planning (BCP) to restore their routine work. 6 However, the disruption to business continuity in the wake of the infectious disease disaster/COVID-19 made it difficult for public health centers to move to the stage of recovery, while simultaneously maintaining routine work. 4 Generally, the structure of routine work at public health centers is highly dependent on progress on the tasks executed by projects and teams. Nevertheless, the response to infectious diseases requires a structure with high interdependence and mutual influence between departments and tasks; this makes the continuity of work related to infectious disease response a prerequisite for the recovery of routine work by public health centers. The outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, Influenza A virus subtype H1N1, and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome globally resulted in the suspension of core operations of healthcare institutions amid tremendous damage to organizations or countries. 6 The new infectious disease pandemic demonstrated that the management of patients with chronic diseases, or treatment plans for quarantined people were not clearly planned. Thus, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the BCP guidelines to help healthcare institutions respond quickly to emergencies such as infectious diseases, and -Abstract Truncated-
health care sciences & services,health policy & services