Abstract:Background: Induction of labor is one of the most common interventions in modern obstetrics, and its frequency is expected to continue to increase. There is inconsistency as to how failed induction of labor is defined; however, the majority of studies define success as the achievement of vaginal delivery. Induction of labor in nulliparous women poses an additional challenge with a 15% to 20% incidence of failure, ending in emergency operative deliveries. The Bishop score has been traditionally used before decisions for induction of labor. Nonetheless, it is subjective and prone to marked interobserver variation. Several studies have been conducted to find alternative predictors, yet a reliable, objective method still remains to be introduced and validated. Hence, there is still a need for the development of new predictive tools to facilitate informed decision making, optimization of resources, and minimization of potential risks of failure. Furthermore, a peripartum transperineal ultrasound scan has been proven to provide objective, noninvasive assessment of labor. Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of developing and validating an objective and reproducible model for the prediction of cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancies. Study design: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted in Cairo University Hospitals and University of Bologna Hospitals between November 2018 and November 2019. We recruited 382 primigravidae with singleton term pregnancies in cephalic presentation. All patients had baseline Bishop scoring together with various transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessments of the fetus, maternal cervix, and pelvic floor. The managing obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound scan findings. The method and indication of induction of labor, the total duration of stages of labor, mode of birth, and neonatal outcomes were all recorded. Women who had operative delivery for fetal distress or indications other than failure to progress in labor were excluded from the final analysis, leaving a total of 344 participants who were randomly divided into 243 and 101 pregnancies that constituted the model development and cross-validation groups, respectively. Results: It was possible to perform transabdominal and transperineal scans and assess all the required parameters on all study participants. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used for selection of potential predictors and model fitting. The independent predictive variables for cesarean delivery included maternal age (odds ratio, 1.12; P=.003), cervical length (odds ratio, 1.08; P=.04), angle of progression at rest (odds ratio, 0.9; P=.001), and occiput posterior position (odds ratio, 5.7; P=.006). We tested the performance of the prediction model on our cross-validation group. The calculated areas under the curve for the ability of the model to predict cesarean delivery were 0.7969 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.87) and 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.97) for the developed and validated models, respectively. Conclusion: Maternal age and sonographic fetal occiput position, angle of progression at rest, and cervical length before labor induction are very good predictors of induction outcome in nulliparous women at term.

Current predictors for morbidity regarding choice of birth after a previous caesarean section, show poor predictive value in prediction modelling

Development of Prediction Models for Successful External Cephalic Version and Delivery Outcome

Predicting significant maternal morbidity in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean section

Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: Validation of a prediction model

Prediction of intrapartum caesarean section in vaginal breech birth: development of models for nulliparous and multiparous women

A Model to Predict Vaginal Delivery and Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity in Low-Risk Nulliparous Patients at Term

Predicting cesarean delivery for failure to progress as an outcome of labor induction in term singleton pregnancy

Association Between First Caesarean Delivery and Adverse Outcomes in Subsequent Pregnancy: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Systematic Review of Clinical Prediction Models for the Risk of Emergency Caesarean Births

Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China.

Evaluation of factors that predict the success rate of trial of labor after the cesarean section

Predicting vaginal delivery after labor induction using machine learning: Development of a multivariable prediction model

Development And Validation Of Predictive Models For Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery In China

Risk of stillbirth after a previous caesarean delivery: A Swedish nationwide cohort study

Construction and verification of prediction models for intrapartum cesarean section to be used at full-term pregnant women with singleton and cephalic presentation under the new labor standard: a retrospective case-control study

May the indication for a previous cesarean section affect the outcome at trial of labor in women with induction of labor? A retrospective cohort study

A Prediction Model for Severe Maternal Morbidity in Laboring Patients at Term

Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity: Repeat Cesarean Versus a Trial of Labour after Previous Cesarean Delivery

Variations over time in mode of birth and perinatal outcomes in women with one previous cesarean in the Netherlands: A 20-year population-based study

Unplanned cesarean sections in advanced maternal age: A predictive model

Prediction of scar integrity and vaginal birth after caesarean delivery