Prevalence and Magnitude of Olfactory Dysfunction in Allergic Rhinitis

Marco A. Fornazieri,Ellen C.D. Garcia,Ricardo H. Montero,Ricardo Borges,Thiago F.P. Bezerra,Fábio R. Pinna,Richard L. Doty,Richard L. Voegels
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924241253642
2024-05-19
American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy
Abstract:American Journal of Rhinology &Allergy, Ahead of Print. BackgroundAlthough allergic rhinitis (AR) can negatively impact the ability to smell, the degree to which this occurs is not clear and prevalence estimates vary among studies. This study had 4 main objectives: (1) To estimate the prevalence and the degree of olfactory dysfunction in AR patients; (2) To compare olfactory perception between AR patients with different persistence and severity of symptoms and determine if olfactory testing may aid in differentiating among Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) groups; (3) To determine whether allergic reactions to different allergens differentially impact olfactory function, and (4) Verify possible changes in the olfactory epithelium (OE) caused by AR.MethodsOne hundred thirty-three patients with AR and one hundred controls were tested. The main outcome was the score in University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®). The OE was examined using immunofluorescence markers for neuronal activity, apoptosis, oxidative stress, signal transduction, eosinophils, and epithelial thickness.ResultsPrevalence of olfactory dysfunction in the AR patients was higher (AR: 42.9% vs controls: 9%, P .05). Although not significant, patients with AR had a greater amount of eosinophilia and a lower amount of cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate) in the OE.ConclusionThe study highlights a higher prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in AR patients compared to controls, but olfactory testing may not effectively differentiate AR severity or allergen sensitivities. Although trends suggest potential pathophysiological changes in the OE of AR patients, further research is needed to validate these findings.
otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?