Abstract:Most models of ecological and eco‐evolutionary processes involve creating trajectories of something, be it population densities, average trait values, or environmental states, over time. This requires decision‐making regarding how to represent the flow of time in models. Most ecologists are exposed to continuous‐time models (typically in the form of ordinary differential equations) as part of their training, especially since the famous Lotka‐Volterra predator–prey dynamics are formulated this way. However, few appear sufficiently well trained to produce their own work with continuous‐time models and may lack exposure to the true versatility of available methods. Specifically, knowledge that discrete individuals can be modelled in continuous time using the Gillespie algorithm is not as widespread as it should be. I will illustrate the flexibility of continous‐time modelling methods such that researchers can make informed choices, and not resort to discretizing time as a 'default' without a clear biological motivation to do so. I provide three example‐based tutorials: (1) a comparison of deterministic and stochastic dynamics of the Lotka‐Volterra predator–prey model, (2) an evaluation of matelessness in a hypothetical insect population (and of selection to mate more often by either searching more efficiently or by shortening the 'time out' after each mating) and (3) within‐season density dependence followed by a birth pulse leading to Beverton‐Holt or Ricker dynamics depending on whether the deaths of conspecifics help reduce the mortality of others or not (compensatory mortality). I highlight properties of the exponential distribution that, while counter‐intuitive, are good to know when deriving expected lifetime reproductive success or other similar quantities. I also give guidance on how to proceed if the so‐called memorylessness assumption does not hold in a given situation, and show how continuous and discrete times can be freely mixed if the biological situation dictates this to be the preferred option. Continuous‐time models can also be empirically fitted to data, and I review briefly the insight this gives into the so‐called 'do hares eat lynx?' paradox that has been plaguing the interpretation of the Hudson Bay hare and lynx dataset.

The time horizon and its role in multiple species conservation planning

Ecological time lags in biodiversity response to habitat changes

Maximizing Phylogenetic Diversity under Time Pressure: Planning with Extinctions Ahead

Who is afraid of modelling time as a continuous variable?

Quantifying extinction probabilities of endangered species for phylogenetic conservation prioritization may not be as sensitive as might be feared

Time is of the essence: A general framework for uncovering temporal structures of communities

On species persistence-time distributions

A general theory of intertemporal decision-making and the perception of time

Competition for time: Evidence for an overlooked, diversity‐maintaining competitive mechanism

Time‐varying habitat selection analysis: A model and applications for studying diel, seasonal, and post‐release changes

Addressing temporal trends in survivorship from cross-sectional sampling designs: A modelling framework with applications for megafauna conservation

Prioritizing global conservation efforts

Life histories decide reserve benefits in transient yields and bycatch persistence

The relationship between temporal discounting and foraging

Bridging theory and experiments of priority effects

Scarcity and intertemporal choice.

Timing decisions as the next frontier for collective intelligence

Impacts of Biodiversity Loss Escalate Through Time as Redundancy Fades

Transient Perturbations Reveal Distinct Strategies for Reserve Benefits in Life History-Dependent Ecosystems

Extinction time distributions of populations and genotypes