Abstract:The coordinated motion by multiple swimmers is a fundamental component in fish schooling. The flow field induced by the motion of each self-propelled swimmer implies non-linear hydrodynamic interactions among the members of a group. How do swimmers compensate for such hydrodynamic interactions in coordinated patterns? We provide an answer to this riddle though simulations of two, self-propelled, fish-like bodies that employ a learning algorithm to synchronise their swimming patterns. We distinguish between learned motion patterns and the commonly used a-priori specified movements, that are imposed on the swimmers without feedback from their hydrodynamic interactions. First, we demonstrate that two rigid bodies executing pre-specified motions, with an alternating leader and follower, can result in substantial drag-reduction and intermittent thrust generation. In turn, we study two self-propelled swimmers arranged in a leader-follower configuration, with a-priori specified body-deformations. These two self-propelled swimmers do not sustain their tandem configuration. The follower experiences either an increase or decrease in swimming speed, depending on the initial conditions, while the swimming of the leader remains largely unaffected. This indicates that a-priori specified patterns are not sufficient to sustain synchronised swimming. We then examine a tandem of swimmers where the leader has a steady gait and the follower learns to synchronize its motion, to overcome the forces induced by the leader's vortex wake. The follower employs reinforcement learning to adapt its swimming-kinematics so as to minimize its lateral deviations from the leader's path. Swimming in such a sustained synchronised tandem yields up to [Formula: see text] reduction in energy expenditure for the follower, in addition to a [Formula: see text] increase in its swimming-efficiency. The present results show that two self-propelled swimmers can be synchronised by adapting their motion patterns to compensate for flow-structure interactions. Moreover, swimmers can exploit the vortical structures of their flow field so that synchronised swimming is energetically beneficial.

No many-scallop theorem: Collective locomotion of reciprocal swimmers

Reciprocal microswimming in fluctuating and confined environments

Locomotion of a flexible one-hinge swimmer in Stokes regime

A bi-directional low-Reynolds-number swimmer with passive elastic arms

Analysing the motion of scallop-like swimmers in a noisy environment

A basic swimmer at low Reynolds number

Low-Reynolds-number, bi-flagellated Quincke swimmers with multiple forms of motion

A two-dimensional model of low-Reynolds number swimming beneath a free surface

Collective Locomotion of Two Uncoordinated Undulatory Self-Propelled Foils

Swimming with a cage: Low-Reynolds-number locomotion inside a droplet

Nonreciprocal model swimmer at intermediate Reynolds numbers

Collective motion in a sheet of microswimmers

A Low Reynolds Predator

Anisotropic Swimming and Reorientation of an Undulatory Microswimmer in Liquid-Crystalline Polymers

A rigorous proof of the scallop theorem and a finite mass effect of a microswimmer

Synchronised Swimming of Two Fish

A Swimming Rheometer: Self-propulsion of a freely-suspended swimmer enabled by viscoelastic normal stresses

Synchronisation through learning for two self-propelled swimmers

Physics of Microswimmers - Single Particle Motion and Collective Behavior

Modeling straight and circle swimmers: from single swimmer to collective motion