Abstract:BACKGROUND:Stochastic genetic switching driven by intrinsic noise is an important process in gene expression. When the rates of gene activation/inactivation are relatively slow, fast, or medium compared with the synthesis/degradation rates of mRNAs and proteins, the variability of protein and mRNA levels may exhibit very different dynamical patterns. It is desirable to provide a systematic approach to identify their key dynamical features in different regimes, aiming at distinguishing which regime a considered gene regulatory network is in from their phenotypic variations.RESULTS:We studied a gene expression model with positive feedbacks when genetic switching rates vary over a wide range. With the goal of providing a method to distinguish the regime of the switching rates, we first focus on understanding the essential dynamics of gene expression system in different cases. In the regime of slow switching rates, we found that the effective dynamics can be reduced to independent evolutions on two separate layers corresponding to gene activation and inactivation states, and the transitions between two layers are rare events, after which the system goes mainly along deterministic ODE trajectories on a particular layer to reach new steady states. The energy landscape in this regime can be well approximated by using Gaussian mixture model. In the regime of intermediate switching rates, we analyzed the mean switching time to investigate the stability of the system in different parameter ranges. We also discussed the case of fast switching rates from the viewpoint of transition state theory. Based on the obtained results, we made a proposal to distinguish these three regimes in a simulation experiment. We identified the intermediate regime from the fact that the strength of cellular memory is lower than the other two cases, and the fast and slow regimes can be distinguished by their different perturbation-response behavior with respect to the switching rates perturbations.CONCLUSIONS:We proposed a simulation experiment to distinguish the slow, intermediate and fast regimes, which is the main point of our paper. In order to achieve this goal, we systematically studied the essential dynamics of gene expression system when the switching rates are in different regimes. Our theoretical understanding provides new insights on the gene expression experiments.

Oscillations in the expression of a self-repressed gene induced by a slow transcriptional dynamics

Modeling stochastic gene expression under repression

Oscillation, Cooperativity, and Intermediates in the Self-Repressing Gene

Single Molecule Dynamics and Statistical Fluctuations of Gene Regulatory Networks: A Repressilator

Stochastic equations for a self-regulating gene

Cell-cycle-synchronized, oscillatory expression of a negatively autoregulated gene in E. coli

A simple negative interaction in the positive transcriptional feedback of a single gene is sufficient to produce reliable oscillations

Gene expression noise accelerates the evolution of a biological oscillator

Intrinsic fluctuations in stochastic delay systems: theoretical description and application to a simple model of gene regulation

Molecular Level Dynamics of Genetic Oscillator—the Effect of Protein-Protein Interaction

Efficient analysis of stochastic gene dynamics in the non-adiabatic regime using piecewise deterministic Markov processes

Reliability of frequency- and amplitude-decoding in gene regulation

Nonlocal dynamics in a gene regulatory system with tempered stable Levy noise

Adiabatic and Non-Adiabatic Non-Equilibrium Stochastic Dynamics of Single Regulating Genes

Distinguishing the Rates of Gene Activation from Phenotypic Variations

Bistable switching asymptotics for the self regulating gene

Stochastic timing in gene expression for simple regulatory strategies

Mechanisms of noise-resistance in genetic oscillators

Biological oscillations without genetic oscillator or external forcing

Transitions in a Genetic Transcriptional Regulatory System under Lévy Motion

Synchronized Oscillations and Chaos in Coupled Genetic Repressilators