Abstract:We apply two approximate solutions of the quantum-classical Liouville equation (QCLE) in the mapping representation to the simulation of the laser-induced response of a quantum subsystem coupled to a classical environment. These solutions, known as the Poisson Bracket Mapping Equation (PBME) and the Forward-Backward (FB) trajectory solutions, involve simple algorithms in which the dynamics of both the quantum and classical degrees of freedom are described in terms of continuous variables, as opposed to standard surface-hopping solutions in which the classical degrees of freedom hop between potential energy surfaces dictated by the discrete adiabatic state of the quantum subsystem. The validity of these QCLE-based solutions is tested on a non-trivial electron transfer model involving more than two quantum states, a time-dependent Hamiltonian, strong subsystem-bath coupling, and an initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states that depends on the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling. In particular, we calculate the time-dependent population of the photoexcited donor state in response to an ultrafast, on-resonance pump pulse in a three-state model of an electron transfer complex that is coupled asymmetrically to a bath of harmonic oscillators through the optically dark acceptor state. Within this approach, the three-state electron transfer complex is treated quantum mechanically, while the bath oscillators are treated classically. When compared to the more accurate QCLE-based surface-hopping solution and to the numerically exact quantum results, we find that the PBME solution is not capable of qualitatively capturing the population dynamics, whereas the FB solution is. However, when the subsystem-bath coupling is decreased (which also decreases the initial energy shift between the donor and acceptor states) or the initial shift is removed altogether, both the PBME and FB results agree better with the QCLE-based surface-hopping results. These findings highlight the challenges posed by various conditions such as a time-dependent external field, the strength of the subsystem-bath coupling, and the degree of asymmetry on the accuracy of the PBME and FB algorithms. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4799272]

Derivation of Maxwell-Bloch-type equations by projection of quantum models

A Unified Hamiltonian Solution to Maxwell–Schrödinger Equations for Modeling Electromagnetic Field–particle Interaction

Modeling Rabi Oscillation By Rigorously Solving Maxwell-Schrodinger Equation

Dynamical Algebraic Approach to the Modified Jaynes-Cummings Model

Simulating Maxwell–Schrödinger Equations by High-Order Symplectic FDTD Algorithm

Quantum simulation of Maxwell's equations via Schrödingersation

Quantum Simulation of Maxwell's Equations Via Schrödingerisation

Dynamics of Coupled Cavity Arrays Embedded in a Non-Markovian Bath

Analog quantum simulation of parabolic partial differential equations using Jaynes-Cummings-like models

Optoelectronic device simulations based on macroscopic Maxwell-Bloch equations

A Mixed Quantum-Classical Liouville Study Of The Population Dynamics In A Model Photo-Induced Condensed Phase Electron Transfer Reaction

Tutorial: projector approach to master equations for open quantum systems

Stochastic correction to the Maxwell-Bloch equations via the positive $P$ representation

Markovian and non-Markovian master equations versus an exactly solvable model of a qubit in a cavity

Qubit Lattice Algorithms based on the Schrodinger-Dirac representation of Maxwell Equations and their Extensions

Supercomputer model of finite-dimensional quantum electrodynamics applications

Microscopic derivation of the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity losses

Analytical solutions of the open Jaynes-Cummings and quantum Rabi models

Fokker-Planck Quantum Master Equation for Mixed Quantum-Semiclassical Dynamics.

Modeling of Fluctuations in Dynamical Optoelectronic Device Simulations within a Maxwell-Density Matrix Langevin Approach