Abstract:Consider the problem of testing $s$ hypotheses simultaneously. The usual approach restricts attention to procedures that control the probability of even one false rejection, the familywise error rate (FWER). If $s$ is large, one might be willing to tolerate more than one false rejection, thereby increasing the ability of the procedure to correctly reject false null hypotheses. One possibility is to replace control of the FWER by control of the probability of $k$ or more false rejections, which is called the $k$-FWER. We derive both single-step and step-down procedures that control the $k$-FWER in finite samples or asymptotically, depending on the situation. We also consider the false discovery proportion (FDP) defined as the number of false rejections divided by the total number of rejections (and defined to be 0 if there are no rejections). The false discovery rate proposed by Benjamini and Hochberg [J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 (1995) 289--300] controls $E(FDP)$. Here, the goal is to construct methods which satisfy, for a given $\gamma$ and $\alpha$, $P\{FDP>\gamma\}\le \alpha$, at least asymptotically. In contrast to the proposals of Lehmann and Romano [Ann. Statist. 33 (2005) 1138--1154], we construct methods that implicitly take into account the dependence structure of the individual test statistics in order to further increase the ability to detect false null hypotheses. This feature is also shared by related work of van der Laan, Dudoit and Pollard [Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3 (2004) article 15], but our methodology is quite different. Like the work of Pollard and van der Laan [Proc. 2003 International Multi-Conference in Computer Science and Engineering, METMBS'03 Conference (2003) 3--9] and Dudoit, van der Laan and Pollard [Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 3 (2004) article 13], we employ resampling methods to achieve our goals. Some simulations compare finite sample performance to currently available methods.

Generalizing Simes' test and Hochberg's stepup procedure

Stepup procedures controlling generalized FWER and generalized FDR

Control of generalized error rates in multiple testing

Generalizations of the Familywise Error Rate

Efficient three-stage $t$-tests

On Asymptotic Behaviors of Stepwise Multiple Testing Procedures

On limiting behaviors of stepwise multiple testing procedures

Generalized FWER Control Procedures for Testing Multiple Hypotheses

On a generalized false discovery rate

Sequential tests of multiple hypotheses controlling type I and II familywise error rates

Power-enhanced multiple decision functions controlling family-wise error and false discovery rates

On stepdown control of the false discovery proportion

Exact and Approximate Stepdown Methods for Multiple Hypothesis Testing

Analysis of error control in large scale two-stage multiple hypothesis testing

A Family of Bayes Multiple Testing Procedures

Bonferroni-Type Plug-In Procedure Controlling Generalized Familywise Error Rate

Multiple testing using uniform filtering of ordered p-values

A Rejection Principle for Sequential Tests of Multiple Hypotheses Controlling Familywise Error Rates

Simultaneous critical values for $t$-tests in very high dimensions

Robustness of multiple testing procedures against dependence

Step-Up Procedure Controlling Generalized Family-Wise Error Rate