Abstract:While computer training is widely recognized as an essential contributor to the productive use of computers in organizations, very little research has focused on identifying the processes through which training operates, and the relative effectiveness of different methods for such training. This research examined the training process, and compared a behavior modeling training program, based on Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura [Bandura, A. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych. Rev. 84(2) 191–215; Bandura, A. 1978. Reflections on self-efficacy. Adv. Behavioral Res. Therapy 1 237–269; Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Amer. Psychologist 372 122–147; Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.]), to a more traditional, lecture-based program. According to Social Cognitive Theory, watching others performing a behavior, in this case interacting with a computer system, influences the observers' perceptions of their own ability to perform the behavior, or self-efficacy, and the expected outcomes that they perceive, as well as providing strategies for effective performance. The findings provide only partial support for the research model. Self-efficacy exerted a strong influence on performance in both models. In addition, behavior modeling was found to be more effective than the traditional method for training in Lotus 1-2-3, resulting in higher self-efficacy and higher performance. For WordPerfect, however, modeling did not significantly influence performance. This finding was unexpected, and several possible explanations are explored in the discussion. Of particular surprise were the negative relationships found between outcome expectations and performance. Outcome expectations were expected to positively influence performance, but the results indicated a strong negative effect. Measurement limitations are presented as the most plausible explanation for this result, but further research is necessary to provide conclusive explanations.

Why Task-Based Training is Superior to Traditional Training Methods

Comparison of Spreadsheets with other Development Tools (limitations, solutions, workarounds and alternatives)

Training Gamble leads to Corporate Grumble?

The Future of Spreadsheets in the Big Data Era

Investigating the use of Software Agents to Reduce The Risk of Undetected Errors in Strategic Spreadsheet Applications

Qtier-Rapor: Managing Spreadsheet Systems & Improving Corporate Performance, Compliance and Governance

Establishing A Minimum Generic Skill Set For Risk Management Teaching In A Spreadsheet Training Course

A Structured Approach to the development of Solutions in Excel

Spreadsheet Risk - A New Direction for HMRC?

A Practical Approach to Managing Spreadsheet Risk in a Global Business

Spreadsheets Grow Up: Three Spreadsheet Engineering Methodologies for Large Financial Planning Models

To Abstract or Not to Abstract? A Comparative Study Evaluating the User Experience of Spreadsheet Programming with Sheet-Defined Functional Abstractions

Leveraging User Profile and Behaviour to Design Practical Spreadsheet Controls for the Finance Function

Exploring Human Factors in Spreadsheet Development

An Empirical Study of End-User Behaviour in Spreadsheet Error Detection & Correction

Spreadsheets: Aiming the Accountant's Hammer to Hit the Nail on the Head

Integrating Spreadsheet Engineering in a Management Science Course: A Hierarchical Approach

Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills

Teaching Spreadsheets: Curriculum Design Principles

Spreadsheet Errors: What We Know. What We Think We Can Do

Concerning the Feasibility of Example-driven Modelling Techniques