Moderate-Intensity and High-Intensity Interval Exercise Training Offer Equal Cardioprotection, with Different Mechanisms, during the Development of Type 2 Diabetes in Rats

Sarah D'Haese,Lisa Claes,Iris de Laat,Sven Van Campenhout,Dorien Deluyker,Ellen Heeren,Sibren Haesen,Ivo Lambrichts,Kristiaan Wouters,Casper G. Schalkwijk,Dominique Hansen,BO Eijnde,Virginie Bito
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16030431
IF: 5.9
2024-02-01
Nutrients
Abstract:Endurance exercise training is a promising cardioprotective strategy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but the impact of its intensity is not clear. We aimed to investigate whether and how isocaloric moderate-intensity exercise training (MIT) and high-intensity interval exercise training (HIIT) could prevent the adverse cardiac remodeling and dysfunction that develop T2DM in rats. Male rats received a Western diet (WD) to induce T2DM and underwent a sedentary lifestyle (n = 7), MIT (n = 7) or HIIT (n = 8). Insulin resistance was defined as the HOMA-IR value. Cardiac function was assessed with left ventricular (LV) echocardiography and invasive hemodynamics. A qPCR and histology of LV tissue unraveled underlying mechanisms. We found that MIT and HIIT halted T2DM development compared to in sedentary WD rats (p < 0.05). Both interventions prevented increases in LV end-systolic pressure, wall thickness and interstitial collagen content (p < 0.05). In LV tissue, HIIT tended to upregulate the gene expression of an ROS-generating enzyme (NOX4), while both modalities increased proinflammatory macrophage markers and cytokines (CD86, TNF-α, IL-1β; p < 0.05). HIIT promoted antioxidant and dicarbonyl defense systems (SOD2, glyoxalase 1; p < 0.05) whereas MIT elevated anti-inflammatory macrophage marker expression (CD206, CD163; p < 0.01). We conclude that both MIT and HIIT limit WD-induced T2DM with diastolic dysfunction and pathological LV hypertrophy, possibly using different adaptive mechanisms.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is whether moderate - intensity continuous training (MIT) and high - intensity interval training (HIIT) can provide the same cardioprotective effects during the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and to explore the different mechanisms of these two different - intensity exercise trainings on cardioprotection. Specifically, the researchers want to know: 1. **Cardioprotective effects**: Whether MIT and HIIT have the same effects in preventing adverse cardiac remodeling and dysfunction caused by T2DM. 2. **Differences in mechanisms**: If both are effective, through which different mechanisms do they each achieve cardioprotective effects? ### Research background - **Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)**: Globally, the prevalence of T2DM continues to rise, and patients are at a higher risk of heart failure. - **Cardioprotection**: Current treatment methods mainly rely on drugs, but lifestyle changes, especially endurance exercise training, are considered effective methods for preventing and treating T2DM and its cardiovascular complications. - **Exercise training**: Although moderate - intensity continuous training (MIT) is widely recommended, whether high - intensity interval training (HIIT) can provide better cardioprotective effects remains controversial. ### Research purposes - **Compare the effects of MIT and HIIT**: Through animal experiments, compare the effects of MIT and HIIT in preventing adverse cardiac remodeling and dysfunction caused by T2DM. - **Explore mechanisms**: Analyze the different mechanisms of the two training methods for cardioprotection, including changes in gene expression, inflammatory response, and oxidative stress. ### Main findings - **Improvement in cardiac function**: Both MIT and HIIT can significantly prevent the increase in left ventricular systolic pressure, wall thickness, and interstitial collagen content caused by T2DM. - **Changes in gene expression**: HIIT tends to up - regulate the gene expression of ROS - generating enzyme (NOX4), and both training methods increase the expression of pro - inflammatory macrophage markers and cytokines. - **Antioxidant and anti - inflammatory mechanisms**: HIIT promotes the gene expression of antioxidant and dicarbonyl defense systems (such as SOD2 and glyoxalase 1), while MIT increases the expression of anti - inflammatory macrophage markers (such as CD206 and CD163). ### Conclusions - **Equivalent cardioprotective effects**: MIT and HIIT have equivalent effects in preventing adverse cardiac remodeling and dysfunction caused by T2DM. - **Different adaptation mechanisms**: Although the effects are similar, the two training methods act through different mechanisms. HIIT focuses more on antioxidant and dicarbonyl defense systems, while MIT focuses more on anti - inflammatory mechanisms. Through these findings, the researchers provide more exercise training options for T2DM patients and provide a theoretical basis for further research.