Abstract:<p>In this paper we investigate to what extent the bootstrap can be applied to conditional mean models, such as regression or time series models, when the volatility of the innovations is random and possibly non-stationary. In fact, the volatility of many economic and financial time series displays persistent changes and possible non-stationarity. However, the theory of the bootstrap for such models has focused on deterministic changes of the unconditional variance and little is known about the performance and the validity of the bootstrap when the volatility is driven by a non-stationary stochastic process. This includes near-integrated exogenous volatility processes as well as near-integrated GARCH processes, where the conditional variance has a diffusion limit; a further important example is the case where volatility exhibits infrequent jumps. This paper fills this gap in the literature by developing conditions for bootstrap validity in time series and regression models with non-stationary, stochastic volatility. We show that in such cases the distribution of bootstrap statistics (conditional on the data) is random in the limit. Consequently, the conventional approaches to proofs of bootstrap consistency, based on the notion of weak convergence in probability of the bootstrap statistic, fail to deliver the required validity results. Instead, we use the concept of 'weak convergence in distribution' to develop and establish novel conditions for validity of the wild bootstrap, conditional on the volatility process. We apply our results to several testing problems in the presence of non-stationary stochastic volatility, including testing in a location model, testing for structural change using CUSUM-type functionals, and testing for a unit root in autoregressive models. Importantly, we work under sufficient conditions for bootstrap validity that include the absence of statistical leverage effects, i.e., correlation between the error process and its future conditional variance. The results of the paper are illustrated using Monte Carlo simulations, which indicate that a wild bootstrap approach leads to size control even in small samples.</p>

Wild Bootstrap and Asymptotic Inference With Multiway Clustering

Fast and Reliable Jackknife and Bootstrap Methods for Cluster‐Robust Inference

Cluster-Robust Bootstrap Inference in Quantile Regression Models

Reliable Wild Bootstrap Inference with Multiway Clustering

Wild bootstrap inference for penalized quantile regression for longitudinal data

Wild bootstrap inference for instrumental variables regressions with weak and few clusters

Jackknife inference with two-way clustering

Cluster-robust jackknife and bootstrap inference for binary response models

Distributed Bootstrap Simultaneous Inference for High-Dimensional Quantile Regression

Testing for the appropriate level of clustering in linear regression models

Wild Bootstrap for Counting Process-Based Statistics

Bootstrapping non-stationary stochastic volatility

Standard errors for two-way clustering with serially correlated time effects

Leverage, Influence, and the Jackknife in Clustered Regression Models: Reliable Inference Using summclust

High-dimensional bootstrap and asymptotic expansion

Inference via Wild Bootstrap and Multiple Imputation under Fine-Gray Models with Incomplete Data

Wild Residual Bootstrap Inference for Penalized Quantile Regression with Heteroscedastic Errors

Asymptotic Results for the Estimation of the Quadratic Score of a Clustering

Bootstrapping Inference of Average Treatment Effect in Completely Randomized Experiments with High-Dimensional Covariates

Robustness and accuracy of methods for high dimensional data analysis based on Student's t statistic

Bootstrap Inference for Hawkes and General Point Processes