Why the New Evidence on Minimum Resale Price Maintenance Does Not Justify a Per Se or 'Quick Look' Approach

T. Lambert,M. Sykuta

2013-11-01

Abstract:Both theory and empirical evidence (including evidence of retailing trends) suggest that instances of minimum RPM are more likely to be pro- than anticompetitive. Thomas Lambert & Michael Sykuta (Univ. of Missouri)

Economics,Business

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The Empirical Effects of Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

Alexander MacKay,David A Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2513533

2014-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This study is the first to estimate the empirical effects of minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) across a broad variety of products. We analyze conflicting theories using an exogenous state-level law change resulting from the 2007 Leegin Supreme Court decision. In states where RPM contracts are treated under the more relaxed rule-of-reason standard, prices increased. We estimate the welfare impact and find that, in aggregate, consumers are worse off in the rule-of-reason states. Though welfare decreased and prices increased, we find little support for the broad application of any particular theory.
Resale Price Maintenance in a Successive Monopoly Model*

Markus Dertwinkel‐Kalt,Christian Wey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12368

IF: 1.054

2023-11-20

Journal of Industrial Economics

Abstract:We explain why a manufacturer may impose a minimum resale price in a successive monopoly setting. Our argument relies on the retailer having noncontractible choice variables such as the price of a substitute good and/or the retailer's service effort. Our explanation for minimum resale prices is empirically distinguishable from alternative justifications that rely, for instance, on retailer competition and service free riding among retailers. Whether a min RPM benefits or harms consumers depends on its effects: if it softens competition with the substitute product, it tends to harm consumers, and if it secures service provision, it tends to benefit consumers.

Economics
Minimum Resale Price Maintenance: Some Empirical Evidence from Maryland

Elizabeth M Bailey,Gregory K Leonard

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2496

2010-03-12

Abstract:Abstract On October 1, 2009, the State of Maryland enacted a statute that prohibits the use of minimum resale price maintenance (RPM). This was in response to the Supreme Court's 2007 Leegin decision that held that RPM should be evaluated under the rule of reason rather than be considered per se illegal. The Maryland statute provides a natural experiment that can be used to analyze the effect of RPM on retail prices. We analyze the effect of the statute on video game prices in Maryland. Video games were used for this analysis because video game manufacturers have been known to impose RPM. Employing a difference-in-differences approach, we find no effect of the Maryland statute on video game prices.
Exclusionary Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

John Asker,Heski Bar-Isaac

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/W16564

2010-12-01

Abstract:An upstream manufacturer can use minimum retail price maintenance (RPM) to exclude potential competitors. RPM lets the incumbent manufacturer transfer profits to retailers. If entry is accommodated, upstream competition leads to fierce down- stream competition and the breakdown of RPM. Hence, via RPM, retailers internalize the effect of accommodating entry on the incumbent's profits. Retailers may prefer not to accommodate entry; and, if entry requires downstream accommodation, entry can be deterred. We investigate when an incumbent would prefer to exclude, rather than collude with, the entrant and the effect of a retailer cartel. We also consider the effect of imperfect competition. Empirical and policy implications are discussed.

Economics,Business
Multi-Product Pricing and Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt,Christian Wey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3764435

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:We provide a novel explanation for why manufacturers want to enforce a minimum resale price (min RPM) on retailers. A manufacturer sells her good via a multi-product retailer to final consumers by charging a linear wholesale price. The manufacturer then maximizes her profit through min RPM whenever the Edgeworth taxation paradox (ETP) occurs, that is, whenever the retailer could increase profits by decreasing all prices. Unlike many other justifications for RPM, our ETP-driven explanation for min RPM critically relies on interbrand competition, and it is - at least in the case of linear demand functions - always to the detriment of consumers.
Resale Price Maintenance: Customer Service Without Free Riding

Charles A. Ingene,Mark E. Parry,Zibin Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.05.001

IF: 11.19

2020-12-01

Journal of Retailing

Abstract:Recent judicial legalizations of resale price maintenance (RPM) allow a manufacturer to establish limits to the prices that its retailers charge: a maximum price (a ceiling) or a minimum price (a floor). A manufacturer can also choose not to apply an RPM constraint. To determine how RPM affects service levels and the distribution of profit between channel members, we derive the optimal RPM strategy for a manufacturer that sells through competing retailers who provide their own optimal level of demand-enhancing customer service. Our analysis yields four key insights into a manufacturer's use of RPM in the absence of free riding.First, there are conditions for which a manufacturer benefits by applying either an RPM Ceiling or an RPM Floor, but there are also conditions that cause the manufacturer not to intervene in its retailers' pricing decisions. Second, a manufacturer's use of RPM depends on how effectively its retailers provide service, and their service-effectiveness disparity. Third, intensity of inter-retailer competition affects the manufacturer's optimal application of RPM. Fourth, RPM Floors often enhance a large retailer's profit relative to the absence of RPM – but this does not hold for a small retailer. Our findings generate significant managerial implications, insights into the consequences of laws that allow manufacturers to limit their retailers' pricing decisions. We also offer suggestions for future research.

business
Empirical Effects of Resale Price Maintenance: Evidence from Fixed Book Price Policies in Europe

Rhys J Williams

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhae004

2024-03-30

Journal of Competition Law & Economics

Abstract:Abstract This paper investigates the effects of Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) agreements in Europe by studying a legally permitted form of RPM in the book market. In particular, we study the effects of such agreements on prices and sales, finding that countries which have Fixed Book Prices policies witness higher book sales, relative to countries without such a policy, with no noticeable effect on the average price of books. We suggest that the mechanism for these findings is that FBP policies promote non-price competition and a diverse network of retailers, increasing quantity, whereas a change in bargaining power reduces double marginalisation, offsetting upward pricing pressure from RPM. While these results are limited to the book sector and are based on a limited number of countries changing policy, they nonetheless highlight that RPM agreements have the ability to confer positive competition effects and absolute prohibition of such agreements may not always be warranted.

economics,law
ON THE PROFITABILITY OF RESALE PRICE MAINTENANCE WHEN DEMAND IS UNCERTAIN

Hao Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12183

2018-12-19

Bulletin of Economic Research

Abstract:A previous study finds that in a market where a manufacturer faces uncertain demand and sells to consumers through competitive retailers, the manufacture wishes to support adequate retail inventories by imposing resale price maintenance (RPM). I show that if retail inventories are allocated to consumers through first‐come‐first‐served rule rather than efficient rationing rule in the game with unconstrained retail competition, imposing RPM may not be profitable. It may not encourage more retail inventories either. RPM may also lower consumer surpluses and social welfare. This study casts some doubt on the demand uncertainty theory that supports RPM.

economics
Resale Price Maintenance: Implications of Marketing Trends for the Colgate Doctrine and the Leegin Factors

Gregory T. Gundlach,Riley T. Krotz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618821315

2019-05-20

Abstract:Resale price maintenance (RPM) is a channel pricing strategy that restricts the price below which a reseller may sell a manufacturer’s product. More than $300 billion in U.S. sales are affected annually by RPM agreements. Adopting a marketing perspective and analyzing trends in distribution arrangements and marketing channel systems, the authors offer predictions regarding the antitrust treatment of RPM following the Supreme Court’s decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. (2007). This research furthers the understanding of the role of the prior Colgate doctrine in establishing the existence of an RPM agreement and the impact of the new Leegin factors for assessing the competitive effects of RPM. Implications for stakeholders affected by RPM and related unilateral price policies are discussed.

business
Manufacturer Collusion and Resale Price Maintenance

Matthias Hunold,Johannes Muthers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12382

IF: 1.054

2024-01-24

Journal of Industrial Economics

Abstract:We provide a novel theory of harm for resale price maintenance (RPM). In a model with two manufacturers and two retailers, we show that RPM facilitates manufacturer collusion when retailers have alternatives to selling a manufacturer's product. Because of the alternatives, manufacturers can only ensure that retailers sell their products by leaving sufficient retail margins. This restricts the wholesale price level even when the manufacturers collude. RPM allows colluding manufacturers to establish higher prices.

economics,business, finance
Resale Price Maintenance in Poland – Further Steps to Its Liberalization or Stuck in a Status Quo?

D. Aziewicz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2901362

2016-06-05

Abstract:Due to the recognition of their positive market effects, the evolving approach to minimum or fixed resale price maintenance (RPM) creates, in many countries, the requirement of analyzing their true economic outcomes. In the light of newest judgments delivered by the Polish Supreme Court, the purpose of this article is to analyze if it is still justified to qualify RPM as a multilateral practice that restricts competition ‘by object’ under Polish law.

Law,Economics
Analysis of the Optimal Strategy for Sale Systems with New Product's Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

LIU Song-song,ZHANG Li-ping,XING Wen-xun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3221.2006.02.007

2006-01-01

Abstract:This paper analyzes the optimal strategies of a manufacturer and a retailer with a new product’s minimum resale price maintenance. The manufacturer sells a new product to the consumers through the retailer , and institutes a minimum resale price. At first , this paper establishes the models. Then , it analyzes and compares the optimal strategies of the manufacturer and the retailer with and without the minimum resale price. Especially , the impact of the minimum resale price maintenance on the manufacturer is discussed.
Violation behavior in vertical restraint: Empirical analyses in the case of retail price maintenance

Ping Xiao,Xinlei (Jack) Chen,Yuxin Chen,Wei Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.12.001

IF: 8.047

2021-01-01

International Journal of Research in Marketing

Abstract:An extensive body of work within the marketing and economics literature has been devoted to studying vertical restraints, yet only a few researchers have investigated the violation behavior of retailers. In this paper, we investigate violation behavior in the context of retailer price maintenance. We investigate this behavior using a unique data set from a subsidy program in China, which includes transaction-level information that shows retail price maintenance (RPM) practices in multiple product categories by multiple manufacturers across multiple markets. The results from our fixed effects regression show that retailer violations are more likely to occur when intra-product competition is high. However, how retailer violation likelihood varies with inter-product competition may depend on the product category. We find that inter-product competition, is negatively associated with the likelihood of violation, for "less popular" product categories in the program such as washing machines, air conditioners, etc., but is positively associated with the likelihood of violation for "popular" product categories such as refrigerators, televisions, and cell phones. Our research provides some of the first empirical evidence about retailer violation behavior under RPM in the world's largest emerging market by focusing on the relationship between violation behavior and market structure. We discuss the implications for monitoring efforts of manufacturers and regulators. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Pytanie o zasadność stosowania analizy ekonomicznej wobec minimalnych cen odsprzedaży w polskim prawie konkurencji (Validity of an Economic Analysis with Respect to Minimum Resale Price under Polish Competition Law)

D. Aziewicz

2013-05-31

Abstract:Polish Abstract: Artykul porusza tematyke minimalnych cen odsprzedazy, koncentrując sie na prokonkurencyjnym uzasadnieniu ich stosowania. Odwoluje sie do tez wysuwanych przez orzecznictwo sądow Stanow Zjednoczonych, przyblizając ich podejście do RPM na przestrzeni lat. Pokazuje rowniez mozliwośc odpowiedniego zastosowania takiego podejścia przez Prezesa Urzedu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentow.English Abstract: The article addresses the issue of minimum resale price maintenance focusing on pro-competitive effects of this practice. It refers to US federal antitrust law describing its evolving approach to the RPM. The article also shows the possibility of appication of such an approach by the President of the Polish Office of Competition and Consumers Protection.

Economics,Business
The role of nonlinear pricing and resale price maintenance on nominal price stability : Empirical evidence from the ready-to-eat cereal industry

Jorge Florez-Acosta

Abstract:This paper empirically examines the role of nonlinear contracts between manufacturers and retail stores, and Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) on nominal price stability. It is widely accepted in the literature that the incomplete transmission of costs shocks into retail prices is explained by the existence of markup adjustment and price adjustment costs. The vertical conduct of the industry and the existence of vertical restraints such as RPM might introduce further price stickiness or reinforce it. I present a structural model of vertical relations between manufacturers and retailers allowing for nonlinear contracts and vertical restraints, and accounting explicitly for retail price rigidity by including fixed costs of price adjustment in retailer’s profit function. Using micro data on sales of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals from a large supermarket chain in Chicago, I estimate demand, retrieve upstream and downstream markups, and compute bounds of retail price adjustment costs. Results show that the total costs the retailer bears for adjusting prices of its products in a year lie between 1.6% and 3% of its total revenue, on average. JEL Codes: L11, L13, L42.

Economics
Resale Price Maintenance – A Beneficial Tool or a Hardcore Restriction of Competition?

Ananta Jaswal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3551048

2020-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:A major part of antitrust violations are comprised by price fixing arrangements, as they operate against the standard of price being determined by market forces. Such arrangements are a cause of concern in both horizontal and vertical markets. In this regard, Resale Price Maintenance agreements have been a subject of debate in India as well as in various jurisdictions due to a milieu of very interesting questions surrounding them. This paper discusses the treatment accorded to Resale Price Maintenance agreements in India while analysing the Competition Commission of India’s adjudication on this subject. It further assesses the issues and implications arising from the existing framework and highlights the need to develop the jurisprudence on this subject in order to gain a deeper insight into its treatment under our law.
The Anti-monopoly Principles of Resale Price Maintenance under Platform Economy

Tang Yaojia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16538/J.CNKI.JSUFE.2021.04.002

2021-08-01

Abstract:Digital economy requires the establishment of an effective antitrust enforcement system to guarantee the high-quality enforcement of Anti-monopoly Law. In recent years, the resale price maintenance （RPM） has been a focal point in the judicial practice of antitrust enforcement in China. However, the proper application of anti-monopoly principles towards resale price maintenance （RPM） has been in great controversy. Based on analyzing the development of per se rule and rule of reason, we investigate their core and point out that per se rule and rule of reason are complementary, and rule of reason is a system that embodies the economic fact, the economic theory, and the procedure guarantee. In platform economy, resale price maintenance （RPM） has three new features, which are conducting resale price maintenance （RPM） by algorithm, mainly conducted on online platforms with the characteristic of two-sided market, influencing multiple subjects and markets in terms of its economic impact. The efficiency effects of resale price maintenance （RPM） are mainly reflected by overcoming the problem of “free riding” in distribution, achieving network effects, proving high quality, stimulating creativity, etc. The anti-competitive effects of resale price maintenance （RPM） are mainly reflected by facilitating price collusion, market foreclosure, and exploitative pricing. Therefore, it is appropriate to apply rule of reason in specific case review. In platform economy, the application of rule of reason in resale price maintenance （RPM） cases should focus on the analysis of its impact on non-price factors, strengthen algorithm investigation, and fully consider the unique features of platform economy, such as network effects, multi-homing, etc.Despite the fact that the anti-monopoly authority conducts a prudent enforcement and some economic analysis, according to the Antimonopoly Law of China, the antimonopoly rule for resale price maintenance （RPM） cases is per se rule. The judicial practice of China anti-monopoly enforcement demonstrates that multiple reasons can affect enforcement quality and increase the risk of enforcement fault, and that is the simple application of per se rule, the follow-up enforcement of local anti-monopoly authorities, the different principles applied between admiration and judicial authorities, and the inconsistency of punishment standards. It is necessary to stick to rule of reason as the basic principle for vertical restraints and construct the system by strengthening the core of rule of reason to guarantee the high-quality enforcement of Anti-monopoly Law.

Law,Economics,Business
Advertising Information, Advertising Precision and Resale Price Maintenance

Suli Lin,Guan-Ru Chen,Liang-Yu Heish,Kai-Chi Hsu,Sheng-Yeh Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33423/JABE.V21I1.1462

2019-05-12

Journal of Applied Business and Economics

Abstract:As consumers use the retail price as an estimator of product quality, the producer expects the retail price to efficiently signal the quality information. However, in the presence of price competition among retailers, consumers cannot predict quality by observing prices because they cannot identify whether the price discounts result from quality downgrade, or just retail supply’s increase. Since market price movements send noises over quality judgement, the producer uses resale price maintenance to control noises from retail supply. When resale price maintenance is prohibited by antitrust law, a rational expectations model predicts that the manufacturer can replace resale price maintenance with advertising.

Economics,Business
Quantity Competition under Resale Price Maintenance when Most Favored Customers are Strategic

Yossi Aviv,Mikhail Nediak,Yuri Levin,A. Bazhanov

2016-06-11

Abstract:Legal studies usually treat a policy of a manufacturer or retailer as socially harmful if it reduces product output and increases the price. We consider a two-period model where the first-period price is fixed by resale price maintenance (RPM) and resellers endogenously decide to use another "collusion suspect," meet-the-competition clause with a most-favored-customer clause (MFC), to counteract strategic customer behavior. As a result of MFC, second-period (reduced) price increases, and resellers' inventories decrease. However, customer surplus may increase and aggregate welfare increases in the majority of market situations. MFC can not only decrease the losses in welfare and resellers' profits due to strategic customers but, under reseller competition, may even lead to higher levels of these values than with myopic customers, i.e., to gains from increased strategic behavior. MFC may create "MFC-traps" for resellers, where one of possible market outcomes yields a gain from increased strategic behavior while another results in a reseller profit less than the worst profit in any stable outcome without MFC. With growing competition, benefits or losses from MFC can be higher than losses from strategic customer behavior.

Law,Economics,Business
Resale Price Maintenance in China: an Economic Perspective

Shan Jiang,D. Daniel Sokol

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2509854

2015-01-01

Journal of Antitrust Enforcement

Abstract:Journal Article Resale price maintenance in China: an economic perspective Get access Shan Jiang, Shan Jiang Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar D Daniel Sokol D Daniel Sokol D. Daniel Sokol, Professor of Law, Holland Law Center, University of Florida. Email: sokold@law.ufl.edu Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, Volume 3, Issue suppl_1, October 2015, Pages i132–i154, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnv010 Published: 04 June 2015

Why the New Evidence on Minimum Resale Price Maintenance Does Not Justify a Per Se or 'Quick Look' Approach

The Empirical Effects of Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

Resale Price Maintenance in a Successive Monopoly Model*

Minimum Resale Price Maintenance: Some Empirical Evidence from Maryland

Exclusionary Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

Multi-Product Pricing and Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

Resale Price Maintenance: Customer Service Without Free Riding

Empirical Effects of Resale Price Maintenance: Evidence from Fixed Book Price Policies in Europe

ON THE PROFITABILITY OF RESALE PRICE MAINTENANCE WHEN DEMAND IS UNCERTAIN

Resale Price Maintenance: Implications of Marketing Trends for the Colgate Doctrine and the Leegin Factors

Manufacturer Collusion and Resale Price Maintenance

Resale Price Maintenance in Poland – Further Steps to Its Liberalization or Stuck in a Status Quo?

Analysis of the Optimal Strategy for Sale Systems with New Product's Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

Violation behavior in vertical restraint: Empirical analyses in the case of retail price maintenance

Pytanie o zasadność stosowania analizy ekonomicznej wobec minimalnych cen odsprzedaży w polskim prawie konkurencji (Validity of an Economic Analysis with Respect to Minimum Resale Price under Polish Competition Law)

The role of nonlinear pricing and resale price maintenance on nominal price stability : Empirical evidence from the ready-to-eat cereal industry

Resale Price Maintenance – A Beneficial Tool or a Hardcore Restriction of Competition?

The Anti-monopoly Principles of Resale Price Maintenance under Platform Economy

Advertising Information, Advertising Precision and Resale Price Maintenance

Quantity Competition under Resale Price Maintenance when Most Favored Customers are Strategic

Resale Price Maintenance in China: an Economic Perspective