How provinces and cities can sustain US–China climate cooperation

Fan Dai,Jerry Brown,Zhenhua Xie,Yi Wang,Peng Gong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-03919-9

IF: 64.8

2024-12-03

Nature

Abstract:National politics is set to drastically shift in both countries. But avenues for joint action still exist. National politics is set to drastically shift in both countries. But avenues for joint action still exist.

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Cooperation and Divergence between China and the United States in the Governance of Global Climate Change

Bo Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.19873/j.cnki.2096-0212.2016.01.011

2016-01-01

Contemporary Social Sciences

Abstract:China and the United States are two key players in global climate governance.What about their relations in the field of climate change and how should we view these relations? An analysis of their relations in global climate governance is of great significance both for global multinational negotiations and their bilateral relations. The two parties have enhanced their cooperation on climate change since 2009 in terms of increasing willingness, broader scale, more diverse mechanisms and higher effectiveness. With the U.N. Paris Climate Conference 2015 approaching, China-US cooperation will inject much momentum into the multilateral process of reaching an ambitious agreement. However, there are also sharp divergences between China and the U.S. regarding principles, rules, and legal means. These divergences might become prominent during the Paris Conference and need to be addressed at the bilateral level.
Leading the Global Race to Zero Emissions: A New China-U.S. Climate Agenda

Yu Hongyuan,Pan Jiahua,Chao Qingchen,Chai Qimin,Zhu Yunjie,Jiang Lixiao,Cao Jiahan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740021500056

2021-01-01

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies

Abstract:The international community is now acutely aware of the negative global impact of climate change. But efforts to advance global climate agendas will not go far without China and the United States leading the way, given the two major powers’ sheer economic size, global influence, and contributions to greenhouse gas emissions. A growing consensus is that China and the United States share common interests in promoting a global transition toward a carbon-free future. China-U.S. climate cooperation may also encourage other major carbon emitters to shoulder greater international responsibilities and help advance a global low-carbon agenda. This article previews the Biden administration’s climate and energy policies, analyzes the state and impact of China-U.S. interactions in climate governance and energy transition, and presents a set of policy recommendations on how to build trust and increase cooperation between the world’s largest economies and carbon emitters. Washington’s green recovery-centered climate plan will not go far without advancing international cooperation in industrial restructuring, infrastructure investment, emerging key resource development, and market demand. Likewise, Beijing’s ambitious goals of peaking carbon dioxide emissions by 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 will also be difficult to attain if it cannot accelerate green economic growth at home and shoulder the joint leadership of climate governance abroad. In this context, China-U.S. climate cooperation and joint efforts toward carbon neutrality could serve as an icebreaker for the current frosty bilateral relationship.
China-US Climate Cooperation: Creating a New Model of Major-Country Relations?

Shunji Cui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2018.0010

2018-01-01

Asian Perspective

Abstract:Building "a new model of major-country relations,"particularly with the United States, has become one of China's major foreign policy objectives. Yet, outside of China, the concept is often seen as an empty slogan with no practical utility. By examining both the concept of the new model of major-country relations (NMMCR) and China's climate cooperation with the United States, I argue that the concept and initiative of NMMCR-with its emphasis on a common fate and shared futures, viewed as a means of achieving cooperation rather than conflict to achieve common goals-reflects well the changing environment of the twenty-first century and is thus a positive new development in China's foreign policy. KEYWORDS: new model of major-country relations, China-US relations, nontraditional security, climate cooperation, normative structural change.
Climate Investment in China and the United States: Political, Monetary and Technological Drivers

Richard YARROW,CHEN Gang,Gang CHEN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793930523000284

2023-12-01

East Asian Policy

Abstract:China and the United States have seen expeditious investment growth in renewable energy and climate-related industries. Due to differences in political environments and governance structures, monetary settings, and prevailing market technologies and geographic conditions, the two countries demonstrate varied strengths and weaknesses in promoting climate investment. Both countries can learn from each other’s distinctive strengths and weaknesses to identify potential opportunities both for domestic climate programmes and energy cooperation to jointly pursue pathways to achieve net zero carbon footprints.
US-China Climate Relations and the Role of the EU: A Chinese Perspective

Bo Yan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48117-8_13

2024-01-01

Abstract:This chapter provides a comprehensive analysis of climate relations between China and the USA, against the backdrop of the increasingly urgent issue of climate change and a deteriorating international political climate. Focusing both on cooperation and competition between China and the USA in global climate governance since 2021, the chapter also draws attention to the evolving role of the EU in global climate governance and its convergences and divergences with China and the USA on climate governance. The chapter concludes by suggesting that the EU should strive to balance its concerns regarding climate, energy and the economy at different levels in order to assert its leadership and strengthen its climate cooperation with China across various domains.
China, the United States and the European Union: Multiple Bilateralism and Prospects for a New Climate Change Diplomacy

david belis,paul joffe,bart kerremans,ye qi

2015-01-01

Abstract:This article argues that one of the most significant evolutions in global climate politics in recent years is the redefinition of power relations that has emerged since the 2009 Copenhagen summit. In the run-up to a potential new climate deal at the 2015 Paris summit, a new climate change diplomacy may be emerging among three actors that are in many respects the most powerful and influential: China, the United States and the European Union. The rise of China is affecting many areas of global governance, but nowhere is it more evident than in the case of climate change, where a very specific mix of power politics, economic interests and normative environments defines the direction of the debate. This article explores how the latter three elements are shaping and re-shaping “multiple bilateralisms”1 between the US, China and the EU and identifies tentative steps toward stronger collective action. The article concludes that a new, perhaps more decentralized but potentially more inclusive approach on climate change is being established.2
Discussion and Analysis of the Climate Cooperation Prospect among China, the United States and the Europe Union in the Context of Emission Reduction Diplomacy

LIU Hui,TAN Renzhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8049.2013.06.009

2013-01-01

Abstract:Since the 1990s, there has been substantial divergence on the issue of burden sharing among China, the United States and the European Union, with the focus on carbon emission reduction commitments and carbon emission rights. On one hand, China should make use of the advantages of policy continuity to continue strengthening the existing climate and energy cooperation with the United States and the EU; On the other hand, China should promote as soon as possible a more corresponding policy adjustments following Durban climate conference, pursue a more active international climate strategy, and actively participate in and build a long-term planning of global climate governance, with the integration of national development strategies and climate strategy so as to build the orientation of sustainable development.
The potentials and limits of China–EU cooperation on climate change and energy security

Constantin Holzer,Haibin Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-008-0183-1

IF: 1.689

2008-01-01

Asia Europe Journal

Abstract:Due to economic interdependency through trade and investment, economies of scale, and economic complementarities, China and the European Union (EU) have a huge potential for cooperation. Already many things have happened so far. Since 2004, the cooperation on climate change has been a key issue on the political agenda of China–EU summits. In 2005, the EU and China even endorsed a “Joint Declaration on Climate Change” which emphasizes reducing the cost of clean energy key technologies for China, first and foremost through the development and deployment of near-to-zero-emission CCS technology. Letting China gain access to clean energy technology is the key issue of climate change cooperation. Despite great efforts and potential mutual benefits, this is still a field of conflicting interests. The authors argue that currently, cooperation on the transfer of clean energy technology is very limited due to rational interests of the actors and the insecurities involved in cooperation.
Tackling air pollution and extreme climate changes in China: Implementing the Paris climate change agreement

Ernest Tambo,Wang Duo-Quan,Xiao-Nong Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.010

Abstract:China still depends on coal for more than 60% of its power despite big investments in the process of shifting to nuclear, solar and wind power renewable energy resources alignment with Paris climate change agreement (Paris CCA). Chinese government through the Communist Party Central Committee (CPCC) ascribes great importance and commitment to Paris CCA legacy and history landmark implementation at all levels. As the world's biggest carbon dioxide emitter, China has embarked on "SMART" pollution and climate changes programs and measures to reduce coal-fired power plants to less than 50% in the next five years include: new China model of energy policies commitment on CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions reductions to less than 20% non-fossil energy use by 2030 without undermining their economic growth, newly introduced electric vehicles transportation benefits, interactive and sustained air quality index (AQI) monitoring systems, decreasing reliance on fossil fuel economic activities, revision of energy price reforms and renewable energy to less energy efficient technologies development. Furthermore, ongoing CPCC improved environmental initiatives, implemented strict regulations and penalties on local companies and firms' pollution production management, massive infrastructures such as highways to reduce CO2 expansion of seven regional emissions trading markets and programs for CO2 emissions and other pollutants are being documented. Maximizing on the centralized nature of the China's government, implemented Chinese pollution, climate changes mitigation and adaptation initiatives, "SMART" strategies and credible measures are promising. A good and practical example is the interactive and dynamic website and database covering 367 Chinese cities and providing real time information on environmental and pollution emissions AQI. Also, water quality index (WQI), radiation and nuclear safety monitoring and management systems over time and space. These are ongoing Chinese valuable and exemplary leadership in Paris CCA implementation to the global community. Especially to pragmatic and responsible efforts to support pollution and climate changes capacity development, technology transfer and empowerment in emissions surveillance and monitoring systems and "SMART" integrated climate changes mitigation packages in global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) context, citizenry health and wellbeing.
U.S.-China Coordination on Carbon Neutrality: an Analytical Framework

Fredrich Kahrl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200379

2023-01-01

Climate Policy

Abstract:The United States (U.S.) and China are key to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement and reaching carbon neutrality by around mid-century. Despite differences, carbon neutrality will be met more rapidly if the two countries coordinate and facilitate synergies in carbon-neutral technologies and policy development and implementation. Building on long-term pathway models in the U.S. and China, current emissions trends and sources, and a policy analysis, this paper puts forward a novel framework for U.S.-China coordination on carbon neutrality. The analysis reveals similar technology and policy pathways, policy gaps, and shared milestones for decarbonization in 2030, 2040, and 2050-2060. The main technological pathways focus on reductions in energy demand and non-energy-related CO2 emissions, decarbonization of electricity and fuels, and increases in electrification rates and CO2 sequestration. Given existing domestic policies and opportunities for further action, areas for coordination on carbon neutrality include common policy milestones; dialogue and technical exchange; research, development, and demonstration (RD&D); and international climate leadership. Despite escalated tensions between the U.S. and China, and challenges for climate cooperation, coordination between both countries on carbon neutrality is both possible and necessary.Key policy insights Carbon neutrality will be met more swiftly if the U.S. and China coordinate and facilitate synergies in carbon-neutral technologies and policy.Despite the rise in geo-political tensions between the U.S. and China, coordination on carbon neutrality is both possible and necessary.An analytical framework for U.S.-China coordination on carbon neutrality, includes technology and policy pathways, and common milestones of key sectors’ decarbonization for 2030, 2040, and 2050-2050.The two countries could coordinate on common policy milestones, dialogue and technical exchange, research and development, and international climate leadership.
Trends and strategies to enhance global climate governance through science and technology cooperation

JIANG Jia-ni,WANG Wen-tao,ZHONG Ping,WANG Can,LIU Yan-hua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12062/cpre.20170922

2017-01-01

Abstract:The reaching of the Paris agreement indicates that the world is making a positive transition to low-carbon economy,and it has become an international consensus to rely on technological innovation and cooperation to address climate change.In recent years,European Union's leadership in the field of climate change decline.Donald Trump's Administration of the United States recently announced the withdrawal of the Paris agreement.Consequently,the Global Climate Governance once lost leadership and direction.China has always been a guardian in the global climate control process,who has taken an active part in the multilateral process of climate change and has fulfilled its commitment to addressing climate change with its own practical actions.In recent years,China has increasingly shifted from purely low-carbon technology importing countries and recipient countries into a low-carbon country with both technological input and output.In the Post Paris period,China needs to do the strategic adjustment and layout.The breakthrough point will be the international science and technology cooperation in the field of dealing with climate change.Thus,it is necessary to establish a guiding ideology,which is ‘ to practice the interests of community of shared future for mankind,to carry out scientific and technological cooperation on climate change,and to take the initiative to explore new direction of Global Climate Governance’;then China's goals of ecological civilization construction will be achieved,the soft power competitiveness and technology ability to address climate change will be enhanced to be intrinsic motivation,and China can play a comprehensive,active,and positive role to lead Global Climate Governance in the direction of relying on international science and technology cooperation when addressing climate change.
The Politics of Climate Change in China

Ye Qi,Tong Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.221

2013-01-01

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change

Abstract:This article reviews recent studies on the politics of climate change in China. We explain the evolution of policy-making and implementation processes and mechanisms over the past two decades, and discuss how they have eventuated in contemporary trends and challenges. Within the unitary hierarchy of the Chinese political system, the central government is responsible for making major policies, and subnational and local governments are responsible for the implementation. The policy-making process is characterized by a consensus building at the center, in contrast to the open public and partisan debate in Western democracies. Climate policy implementation has been based on a so-called target responsibility system', which disaggregates targets amongst all levels of local governments and related enterprises. While this system has proven effective in achieving the national targets set by the central government, the high costs associated with it have been a source of concern. The key challenge in making and implementing climate policy is to balance economic growth and environmental protection. This challenge is of critical importance in central-local political interactions. Clean energy development has been proposed as a win-win' solution to help balance economic development and climate change mitigation, and to satisfy both central and local government prerogatives, but the sustainability of such a model is questioned when the global and domestic economy experience difficulties. The central government is trying to translate its consensus in climate change and green development into priorities for local governments through policy pilots and market instruments; the real results will soon be seen. WIREs Clim Change 2013, 4:301-313. doi: 10.1002/wcc.221 Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article. For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.
Transition of China's power sector consistent with Paris Agreement into 2050: Pathways and challenges

Haonan Zhang,Xingping Zhang,Jiahai Yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110102

2020-01-01

Abstract:With a high-carbon fuel mix and enormous space for efficiency potential, the power sector is critical to cope with global emission mitigation targets. The climate targets of less than 2 degrees C and even ambitious 1.5 degrees C confront China's power sector due to the rising momentum of power demand and the power mix dominated by coal power. Considering the potential carbon-emissions space of the power sector in China, this paper sets the alternative high-share renewable power, 1.5 and 2 degrees C scenarios that necessitate the zero-emissions and even negative-emissions for the power sector by 2050, and then proposes the pathways and outlines challenges to demonstrate the arduousness and uncertainty of the mega-project of power transition. The results indicate that a package of options is needed for the transition while unconventional bio-energy is the key to a 1.5 degrees C scenario. Notably, the coal power represents the largest barrier to low-carbon transition owing to the rising installation and massive stranded assets during the long-term reconfiguration of the power sector.
Simulation of Climate Negotiation Strategies Between China and the U.S. Based on Game Theory

Jin Zhu-Gang,Cai Wen-Jia,Wang Can

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1248.2014.034

IF: 4.746

2014-01-01

Advances in Climate Change Research

Abstract:Consensus and disagreements between China and the U.S. are the key factors influencing the direction that global climate negotiation is heading for. By taking into account the uncertainties of temperature increment and its impact on GDP growth, together with the positive, negative and spillover effects of climate change investment on utility, a strategic simulation model including China and the U.S. is developed. Based on utility and game theory, a sensitivity analysis is conducted. The results show that the first-mover disadvantage exists in the game, and the scale of each country's climate change investment under non-cooperative scenario is too small to ensure the 2 degrees C target. To guarantee the stability and win-win basis for global cooperation, the simulation results also indicate that it makes sense to assist and compensate technology transfer and funding to China.
Can US multi-state climate mitigation agreements work? A perspective from embedded emission flows

Kaihui Song,Giovanni Baiocchi,Kuishuang Feng,Klaus Hubacek,Laixiang Sun,Daoping Wang,Dabo Guan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102596

IF: 11.16

2022-01-01

Global Environmental Change

Abstract:Subnational and non-governmental actors are expected to provide important contributions to broader climate actions. A consistent and accurate quantification of their GHG emissions is an important prerequisite for the success of such efforts. However, emissions embodied in domestic and international supply chains, that can undermine the effectiveness of climate agreements, add challenges to the quantification of emissions originating from the consumption of goods and services produced elsewhere. We examine emission transfers between the states that have joined the U.S. Climate Alliance (USCA) and others. Our results show that states pledging to curb emissions consistent with the Paris Agreement were responsible for approximately 40% of total U.S. territorial GHG emissions. However, when accounting for transferred emissions through international and interstate supply chains of the products they consume, the share of Alliance states increased to 52.4% of the national total GHG emissions. The consumption-based emissions for some Alliance states, such as Massachusetts and New York, could be more than 1.5 times higher than their production-based emissions. Our detailed sectoral analysis highlights the challenges facing such agreements to extend cooperation in the future for larger joint benefit given the potential for carbon leakage from member states implementing stricter environmental policies that could lead to higher emissions from non-member states. It is critical for these arrangements to pay close attention to transferred emissions.
The evolution of China's climate change policy: international and domestic political economy and a strategy for working with China

Hongyi Lai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/009s10.069

2021-01-01

Journal of the British Academy

Abstract:For over a decade China has been the predominant carbon emitter in the global economy. It is thus imperative for us to understand the factors behind its climate change policy in the past decades. In the article, the author surveys the evolution of China�s climate change policy during 1990�2021 and applies theories from international relations and international political economy to explain it. It is found that (neo-)realism/nationalism and liberalism, two main theories in the field, offer only a partial explanation of China�s climate policy. The most effective theory is domestic sources. In particular, leadership power consolidation and a concern with economic growth seem to dictate China�s climate policy. The findings point to the analytical utility of domestic political economy in accounting for the climate stances of nation-states. Policy suggestions for external parties to interact with China on climate change are proposed. There the importance of involving China in global action against climate change, as well as the utility of the economy and trade leverage, soft power standing, and the prevention of extreme weather are discussed.
US‐China cooperation on low carbon development planning and analysis in China's provinces and cities

Thomas D. Peterson,Stephen M. Roe,Arianna Ugliano,Qingchan Yu,Cuiping Liao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13771

2021-11-10

Abstract:Abstract From 2009 to 18, the US based Center for Climate Strategies and Beijing based Global Environmental Institute led a cooperative US‐China relations program on low carbon development (LCD). The template for bilateral cooperation leveraged traditional policy innovation and mainstreaming procedures in China through early stage training and counterpart exchange, co‐development and piloting of tools, national endorsement for official use, training and capacity building, and cooperative planning actions. The experience suggests that the bilateral cooperation model through high level technical and institutional cooperation between governmental and nongovernmental experts worked well and can be replicated with customization to new bilateral relationships at different jurisdictional levels and for different issue areas. However, to succeed it requires years of stable investment and continuous counterpart engagement, and its application to new bilateral cooperation must address a variety of barriers. The China subnational LCD co‐development process was enabled by an existing US template for state level comprehensive climate action planning applied in over 20 US states. Its domestication in China resulted in creation of the China Subnational LCD Planning and Analysis Toolkit, a pilot in Chongqing, official endorsement by China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), and further recognition through a US State Department – China NDRC EcoPartnership. Ultimately, it involved many partners, including the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute for Policy and Management, the Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, and over 30 provinces and cities. It led to new China efforts addressing renewable energy implementation in South China, and for LCD and renewable energy cooperation in Southeast Asia.

environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental, chemical
A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese and American News Coverage on Climate Change

Xinyuan Huang,Siqi Che

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v14n3p42

2024-05-20

International Journal of English Linguistics

Abstract:As the 27th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP27) convened, the climate issue remained a focal point of coverage in both Chinese and American mainstream media. This paper seeks to explore the linguistic features of news discourse of climate change in China and the United States and the discursive strategy applied to strengthen national ideologies. Taking the reports on climate change in China Daily and Los Angeles Times within 2 months after COP27 as the research corpus, this paper examines the language features, the discursive processes of the text and possible social factors through a combination of corpus linguistics(CL) and critical discourse analysis(CDA) under the framework of Fairclough’s Three-Dimensional Model of Discourse. The finding suggests that both countries enhance national ideologies by constructing a responsible national image through objective climate reporting. Chinese media tends to focus on national efforts to improve ecological environment and global cooperation, while US newspaper attaches importance to climate security and pursues a leading position in global ecological governance.
The US-China Scientific Workshop on Carbon Neutrality and Climate Change

Jin Lin,Ning Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23919/IEN.2023.0040

2023-01-01

iEnergy

Abstract:The United States (US)-China Scientific Workshop on Carbon Neutrality and Climate Change was successfully held at Harvard University on December 1 and 2, 2023 (see Figure 1). Top scholars and experts from China and the US came together to deeply explore seven key issues related to carbon neutrality and climate change to promote cooperation and exchange in this vital area between the two countries.
Towards Proactive Climate Change Policy

QI Ye,MA Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2007.02.002

2007-01-01

China Population Resources and Environment

Abstract:Climate change is treated in China as an issue related closely to the national strategy for sustainable development as well as an issue in international collaboration in environment.The duality of the issue makes the climate change policy often wavering between domestic and international emphases.In the past one and half decades,the central government emphasized mostly on responding to international pressure by participating in negotiations in international treaties.However,the nation,as well as the world,will likely benefit more by taking a more proactive attitude towards mitigation of and adaptation to climate change.This paper described the current governance structure for climate change management in China and made concrete recommendations for its improvement.The most urgent recommendation is to elevate the current National Group for Coordination of Climate Change Strategies to empower the organizing with authority for policy-making and overseeing on climate change.

How provinces and cities can sustain US–China climate cooperation

Cooperation and Divergence between China and the United States in the Governance of Global Climate Change

Leading the Global Race to Zero Emissions: A New China-U.S. Climate Agenda

China-US Climate Cooperation: Creating a New Model of Major-Country Relations?

Climate Investment in China and the United States: Political, Monetary and Technological Drivers

US-China Climate Relations and the Role of the EU: A Chinese Perspective

China, the United States and the European Union: Multiple Bilateralism and Prospects for a New Climate Change Diplomacy

Discussion and Analysis of the Climate Cooperation Prospect among China, the United States and the Europe Union in the Context of Emission Reduction Diplomacy

The potentials and limits of China–EU cooperation on climate change and energy security

Tackling air pollution and extreme climate changes in China: Implementing the Paris climate change agreement

U.S.-China Coordination on Carbon Neutrality: an Analytical Framework

Trends and strategies to enhance global climate governance through science and technology cooperation

The Politics of Climate Change in China

Transition of China's power sector consistent with Paris Agreement into 2050: Pathways and challenges

Simulation of Climate Negotiation Strategies Between China and the U.S. Based on Game Theory

Can US multi-state climate mitigation agreements work? A perspective from embedded emission flows

The evolution of China's climate change policy: international and domestic political economy and a strategy for working with China

US‐China cooperation on low carbon development planning and analysis in China's provinces and cities

A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese and American News Coverage on Climate Change

The US-China Scientific Workshop on Carbon Neutrality and Climate Change

Towards Proactive Climate Change Policy