Shining a light on species delimitation in the tree genus Engelhardia Leschenault ex Blume (Juglandaceae)

Can-Yu Zhang,Shook Ling Low,Yi-Gang Song,Nurainas,Gregor Kozlowski,Truong Van Do,Lang Li,Shi-Shun Zhou,Yun-Hong Tan,Guan-Long Cao,Zhuo Zhou,Hong-Hu Meng,Jie Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106918
IF: 5.019
2020-11-01
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Abstract:<p>Enhanced efficacy in species delimitation is critically important in biology given the pending biodiversity crisis under global warming and anthropogenic activities. In particular, delineation of traditional classifications in view of the complexity of species requires an integrative approach to effectively define species boundaries, and this is a major focus of systematic biology. Here, we explored species delimitation of <em>Engelhardia</em> in tropical and subtropical Asia. In total, 71 populations were genotyped using five chloroplast regions, one nuclear DNA region (nrITS), and 11 nuclear simple sequence repeats (nSSR). Phylogenetic trees were constructed and relationships among species were assessed. Molecular analyses were then combined with 14 morphological characteristics of 720 specimens to further explore the species boundaries of <em>Engelhardia</em>. Integrating phylogenetic and morphological clusters provided well-resolved relationships to delineate seven species. The results suggested that: first, that <em>E</em>. <em>fenzelii</em>, <em>E</em>. <em>roxburghiana</em>, <em>E</em>. <em>hainanensis</em>, <em>E</em>. <em>apoensis</em>, and <em>E</em>. <em>serrata</em> are distinct species; second, <em>E</em>. <em>spicata</em> var. <em>spicata</em>, <em>E</em>. <em>spicata</em> var. <em>aceriflora</em>, <em>E</em>. <em>spicata</em> var. <em>colebrookeana</em>, and <em>E</em>. <em>rigida</em> should be combined under <em>E</em>. <em>spicata</em> and treated as a species complex; third, <em>E</em>. <em>serrata</em> var. <em>cambodica</em> should be raised to species level and named <em>E</em>. <em>villosa</em>. We illuminated that bias thresholds determining the cluster number for delimiting species boundaries were substantially reduced when morphological data were incorporated. Our results urge caution when using the concepts of subspecies and varieties in order to prevent confusion, particularly with respect to species delimitation for tropical and subtropical species. In some cases, re-ranking or combining subspecies and/or varieties may enable more accurate species delimitation.</p>
genetics & heredity,biochemistry & molecular biology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?