Abstract:The neurological examination has remained key for the detection of worsening in neurocritical care patients, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI). New-onset, unreactive anisocoria frequently occurs in such situations, triggering aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic measures to address life-threatening elevations in intracranial pressure (ICP). As such, the field needs objective, unbiased, portable, and reliable methods for quickly assessing such pupillary changes. In this area, quantitative pupillometry (QP) proves promising, leveraging the analysis of different pupillary variables to indirectly estimate ICP. Thus, this scoping review seeks to describe the existing evidence for the use of QP in estimating ICP in adult patients with TBI as compared with invasive methods, which are considered the standard practice. This review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, with a main search of PubMed and EMBASE. The search was limited to studies of adult patients with TBI published in any language between 2012 and 2022. Eight studies were included for analysis, with the vast majority being prospective studies conducted in high-income countries. Among QP variables, serial rather than isolated measurements of neurologic pupillary index, constriction velocity, and maximal constriction velocity demonstrated the best correlation with invasive ICP measurement values, particularly in predicting refractory intracranial hypertension. Neurologic pupillary index and ICP also showed an inverse relationship when trends were simultaneously compared. As such, QP, when used repetitively, seems to be a promising tool for noninvasive ICP monitoring in patients with TBI, especially when used in conjunction with other clinical and neuromonitoring data.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), the effectiveness and reliability of using quantitative pupillometry (QP) to estimate intracranial pressure (ICP), especially when compared with the standard invasive ICP monitoring methods. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate whether QP can be used as a non - invasive, portable and reliable tool for rapidly assessing changes in ICP in TBI patients, especially the ability to predict refractory intracranial hypertension. ### Background - **Clinical needs**: Neurological examinations have always been a key means of detecting the deterioration of patients in neuro - intensive care, especially after TBI. The newly emerged unresponsive anisocoria often indicates the presence of life - threatening elevated intracranial pressure, and rapid diagnostic and treatment measures are required. - **Existing challenges**: Traditional manual assessment of the pupillary light reflex (PLR) has subjective biases, resulting in large differences in measurement results. Although invasive ICP monitoring is regarded as the standard practice, there are problems such as device availability, infection risks and insufficient operator experience, especially in low - income countries. - **Research objectives**: To explore the potential of QP as a non - invasive ICP monitoring method, especially its application in adult TBI patients. ### Research questions 1. **Available methods**: What methods can be used for non - invasive ICP monitoring through QP? 2. **Evidence comparison**: What evidence supports the effectiveness of non - invasive ICP monitoring using QP compared with invasive ICP monitoring? ### Methods - **Literature search**: The research team conducted a systematic search in the PubMed and EMBASE databases, including relevant studies published between 2012 and 2022. - **Inclusion criteria**: The study subjects were TBI patients aged 18 years and above, using QP for non - invasive ICP monitoring and comparing with the results of invasive ICP monitoring. - **Analysis methods**: Descriptive and analytical observational study designs were adopted, including prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, case - control studies, etc. ### Results - **Main findings**: - **NPi index**: Most studies have shown that there is a significant inverse correlation between the Neurological Pupillary Index (NPi) and ICP. The higher the NPi value, the lower the ICP; and vice versa. - **Dynamic variables**: Continuously measured NPi, constriction velocity (CV) and maximum constriction velocity (MCV) have the best correlation with invasive ICP measurements, especially in predicting refractory intracranial hypertension. - **Predictive ability**: Patients with an NPi value below 3 have a higher risk of elevated ICP and a poorer prognosis. ### Conclusions - **Application prospects of QP**: QP, as a non - invasive tool, has potential application value in TBI patients, especially when used in combination with invasive ICP monitoring. However, the current research results still need further verification to improve its reliability and accuracy in clinical practice. Through these studies, the authors hope to provide clinicians with a new, non - invasive ICP monitoring method to improve the management and prognosis of TBI patients.

Quantitative Pupillometry for Intracranial Pressure (ICP) Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review

Optical pupillometry in traumatic brain injury: neurological pupil index and its relationship with intracranial pressure through significant event analysis

Review of non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement techniques for ophthalmology applications

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Treatment Thresholds in Acute Neural Injury: A Narrative Review of the Historical Achievements, Current State, and Future Perspectives

Intracranial pressure: current perspectives on physiology and monitoring

Pcv-aCO2/Ca-cvO2 Combined with Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Predicting Elevated Intracranial Pressure of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in Prehospital Setting

Extracranial pressure (ECP) monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): A prospective study validating intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement for predicting intracranial pressure (ICP)

A trial of intracranial pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury

Non-invasive Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography: Is It Possible?

Noninvasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Are We There Yet?

A Comprehensive Perspective on Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Individualized Management in Neurocritical Care: Results of a Survey with Global Experts

Ultrasonographic assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter as a screening tool for intracranial hypertension in traumatic brain injury

Transcranial doppler in the non-invasive estimation of intracranial pressure in traumatic brain injury compared to other non-invasive methods in lower-middle income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Intracranial pressure monitoring in adult patients with traumatic brain injury: challenges and innovations

Predicting short-term outcomes in brain-injured patients: a comprehensive approach with transcranial Doppler and intracranial compliance assessment

Intracranial-Pressure-Monitoring-Assisted Management Associated with Favorable Outcomes in Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with a GCS of 9-11

Prediction of neurocritical care intensity through automated infrared pupillometry and transcranial doppler in blunt traumatic brain injury: the NOPE study

Observations on the Cerebral Effects of Refractory Intracranial Hypertension After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Nursing Interventions and Intracranial Pressure Change in Pediatric Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Current practice of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with severe traumatic brain injury—a nationwide prospective surveillance study in Germany

Escalating Mean Arterial Pressure in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective, Observational Study