Abstract:Dear Editor, In a recent paper in Diseases of the Esophagus, Zhang and colleagues conclude that “The number of lymph node metastases influences survival and International Union Against Cancer tumor-nodemetastasis classification for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.” However, in their subgroup of patients, the average lymph node yield (LNY) is less than 4 (1146 patients with 4270 LNs harvested), and the number is too low to appropriately evaluate the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) tumor– node–metastasis classification for esophageal cancer. The current UICC classification demands for six LNs for pathologic lymph node (pN) staging. It is considered that the minimal regional LNY of six LNs as recommended by the UICC for esophageal carcinoma is far too low to appropriately stage the disease. Based on an international study including 3651 patients, Peyre et al. concluded that the number of LNs removed is an independent predictor of survival after esophagectomy for cancer, and to maximize this survival benefit, a minimum of 23 regional LNs must be removed. In Dr Rizk’s analysis, a total of 4627 patients who had esophagectomy alone for esophageal cancer were identified from the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration database. Optimum number of nodes that should be resected to maximize 5-year survival was determined by random forest multivariable regression. Rice et al. concluded that greater extent of lymphadenectomy was associated with increased survival for all patients with esophageal cancer except at extremes (TisN0M0 and 7 regional LNs positive for cancer) and welldifferentiated pN0M0 cancer; they also considered that maximum 5-year survival was modulated by T classification: Resecting 10 nodes for pT1, 20 for pT2, and 30 for pT3/T4 was recommended. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results data suggest that patients undergoing surgical resection for esophageal cancer should have at least 18 LNs removed. Recently, Jamieson et al. reviewed the role of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer, and it is considered that from a staging and theoretical oncologic point of view, extended lymphadenectomy is preferred. From the perspective of Dr Jamieson, the role of LNY was also highlighted. Although the effect of the number of positive LNs was analyzed, the LNY is not enough to reflect the LN status of the patients in the paper by Zhang and colleagues, and the authors did not discuss the effect of LNY on the staging of esophageal cancer, so we have outlined the issue here.

Impact of the Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes on Long-term Survival in Node-Negative Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Based on Clinical Stage but Not Pathological Stage

Effect of the Number of Lymph Nodes Harvested on the Long-Term Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients According to Tumor Stage and Location: a 12-Year Study of 1,637 Cases.

The Extent of Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection Correlates with Survival of Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients after Resection: a Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Analysis.

Prognostic Importance of Numbers of Retrieved Lymph Nodes and Positive Lymph Nodes for Ampulla of Vater Cancer (AVC) in 2347 Patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

Prognostic Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Non–small Cell Lung Cancer ≤2 Cm

Number of Positive Lymph Nodes is Superior to LNR and LODDS for Predicting the Prognosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Proposal Of The Optimal Numbers Of Examined And Positive Lymph Nodes To The 8th Edition Of American Joint Committee On Cancer (Ajcc) Staging For 758 Patients With Distal Cholangiocarcinoma

The Value of Lymph Node Ratio in the Prediction of Rectal Cancer Patient Survival after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.

Association between number of dissected lymph nodes and survival in patients undergoing resection for clinical stage IA pure solid lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis

Impact of Examined Lymph Node Count on Precise Staging and Long-Term Survival of Resected Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Population Study of the Us Seer Database and A Chinese Multi-Institutional Registry

Postoperative survival effect of the number of examined lymph nodes on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with pathological stage T1–3N0M0

Adequate number of lymph nodes sampled may determine appropriate surgical modality for early-stage NSCLC: A Population-Based Real-World Study

The Number of Lymph Node Metastases Influences Survival and International Union Against Cancer Tumor-Node-metastasis Classification for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does Lymph Node Yield Matter?

Impact of Removal of Lymph Nodes on Survival in Stage I-III Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Cancer: The More, the Better?

[The prognostic impact of number-indexes of lymph nodes in stage N1c colorectal cancer patients]

Appropriate Lymphadenectomy Significantly Reduced Recurrence after Segmentectomy for Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Impact of Inadequate Number of Lymph Nodes Examined on Survival in Stage II Colon Cancer

Impact on Survival of the Number of Lymph Nodes Resected in Patients with Lymph Node-Negative Gastric Cancer

Number of Negative Lymph Nodes is Associated with Survival in Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Three-Field Lymphadenectomy

Effect of Lymph Node Assessment on Outcomes in Surgery for Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Large Real-World Cohort Study of Examined Lymph Node Standards for Adequate Nodal Staging in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.