Abstract:Sustainable and clean multi-energy systems have been hybrid coordinated in microgrid (MG) to fulfill regional multi-energy users economically, but shortages and surpluses still exist. The growth of win-win energy sharing between MGs attracts attention to smart information center (SIC) concept in MGs’ community, which facilitates sustainable solutions across three key objectives: lower carbon emission, sufficient utilization, and long-term cooperation. This paper designs a two-stage decision framework for day-ahead operations of SIC, where the first stage minimizes the total cost (i.e. operational cost and carbon emission cost) by the proposed multi-energy intra-scheduling and inter-sharing model (MIIM) and the second stage implements the smart cost-saving redistribution model (SCRM) to stimulate MGs in long-term joining of energy sharing. The extended alternating direction multipliers method algorithm (E-ADMM) is developed to protect the privacy of MGs' data while approximating the optimal solution of MIIM. The case study proves that a) demand response and energy sharing in MIIM result in cost savings of 2.01% for carbon emissions and 7.25% for total operations; b) renewable energy has been fully utilized and the total multi-energy loss has been avoided nearly 92.22% in MIIM; c) the asymmetric Nash bargaining approach fits the SCRM with incentive cooperation, whereby those who contribute more gain a higher share; d) the optimal gap of E-ADMM is less than 0.2% by iterated insensitive decision result from each MG, which computes in polynomial time when the scale of MG increases; e) the two-stage framework performs better with more heterogeneity of MGs. Furthermore, we provide valuable insights for guidance and models with worldwide generalization potential.

Low-carbon optimization of multi-microgrid system operation considering supply–demand bidirectionality based on Nash bargaining

Optimal Energy Management for Multi-energy Microgrid Considering Demand Response

Research on Real-Time Coordinated Optimization Scheduling Control Strategy with Supply-Side Flexibility in Multi-Microgrid Energy Systems

Multi-microgrid low-carbon economy operation strategy considering both source and load uncertainty: A Nash bargaining approach

Research on the Optimization of Energy–Carbon Co-Sharing Operation in Multiple Multi-Energy Microgrids Based on Nash Negotiation

Optimal operation of multi-microgrid systems considering multi-level energy-certificate-carbon coupling trading

Low‐carbon Economic Optimal Operation Strategy of Rural Multi‐microgrids Based on Asymmetric Nash Bargaining

Multi-Micro-Grid Main Body Electric Heating Double-Layer Sharing Strategy Based on Nash Game

Low-carbon economic dispatch strategy for interconnected multi-energy microgrids considering carbon emission accounting and profit allocation

Cooperative operation of multiple low-carbon microgrids: An optimization study addressing gaming fraud and multiple uncertainties

Distributionally robust optimal scheduling of multi-microgrid considering asymmetric bargaining

Transaction Model Based on Stackelberg Game Method for Balancing Supply and Demand Sides of Multi-Energy Microgrid

A low-carbon driven price approach for energy transactions of multi-microgrids based on non-cooperative game model considering uncertainties

Cooperative Operation Mechanism of Multi-Energy Microgrids Based on Nash Bargaining Method

Smart Coordinated Multi-Energy Intra-Scheduling Inter-Sharing and Cost-Saving Redistribution for Multiple Microgrids

Optimal Energy Management for Multi-Microgrid System Based on Stackelberg Game.

Bi-level Distributed Day-Ahead Schedule for Islanded Multi-Microgrids in a Carbon Trading Market

A Local Electricity and Carbon Trading Method for Multi-Energy Microgrids Considering Cross-Chain Interaction

Optimal energy management for multi-energy multi-microgrid networks considering carbon emission limitations

A Nash Bargaining Model for Energy Sharing Between Micro-Energy Grids and Energy Storage

Hybrid Game Optimization of Microgrid Cluster (MC) Based on Service Provider (SP) and Tiered Carbon Price