Abstract:Management of resources is often a large-scale task addressed using many small-scale interventions. The range of scales at which organisms respond to those interventions, along with the many outcomes which management aims to achieve can make determining the success of management complex. Environmental flow is an example of management where there is a recognized need for managers to demonstrate the impact of their actions by integrating different types of environmental responses. Here, we aim to support decision making in environmental management via the development of a new modelling framework (eFlowEval). It has the capacity to capture best-available knowledge, to scale it in space and time, explore interactions among species, compare scenarios, and account for uncertainty. Thus, it provides a basis for including multiple target groups in a common system. The framework is readily updatable as new information becomes available and can identify where data are insufficient to be scientifically robust. We demonstrate the eFlowEval framework using three very different environmental responses: 1) metabolism, which is a measure of the energy produced and then used in an ecosystem, 2) favorability for a bird species of interest (royal spoonbill Platalea regia), and 3) competing wetland plants (Centipeda cunninghamii and lippia Phyla canescens). These demonstrations illustrate the capability of the eFlowEval framework but the specific outputs shown here should not be used to assess environmental responses to management. Using these demonstrations, we illustrate the capacity of the eFlowEval framework to provide assessments across a range of scales (local to landscape) and from short time frames (weeks to months) to multi-year assessments. Further, we illustrate the ability to: i) scale responses from local to basin scales, ii) vary driver-response model types, iii) represent uncertainty, iv) compare scenarios, v) accommodate variable parameter values at different locations, and vi) incorporate spatial and temporal dependencies and dependencies among species. We also illustrate the framework's ability to capture inter- and intraspecific interactions and their impact in space and time. The eFlowEval framework extends the capacity of the component response models to provide novel modeling capabilities for management at scale. It allows for interactions among species or processes to be incorporated, as well as in space and time. A large degree of flexibility is offered by the framework, in terms of driver-response model types, input data, and aggregation methods. Thus, the eFlowEval framework provides a mechanism to enhance the transparency of environmental watering decision making, capture institutional knowledge, enhance adaptive management and undertake evaluation of the impact of environmental watering at a range of spatial and temporal scales.

Adaptive Management of National Park Ecosystems

Adaptive Management of Aquatic Germplasm Reserves

Adaptive management of biological systems: A review

Adaptive Management: From More Talk to Real Action

Options for National Parks and Reserves for Adapting to Climate Change

Effects of delay and error in the feedback structure of ecological management

Using Natural Disturbance and Portfolio Concepts to Guide Aquatic-Riparian Ecosystem Management

Developing new technologies to protect ecosystems: planning with adaptive management

Introduction: Ecosystem Assessment and Management

Unusual success, future uncertainty, and science needs for adaptive management of invasive plants in a US national park

Panel-based assessment of ecosystem condition as a platform for adaptive and knowledge driven management

The spread and maturation of strategic adaptive management within and beyond South African national parks

Adaptive co-management of conservation conflicts – An interactional experiment in the context of German national parks

Model uncertainty in the ecosystem approach to fisheries

Adaptive management and the value of information: learning via intervention in epidemiology

Sixteen years of social and ecological dynamics reveal challenges and opportunities for adaptive management in sustaining the commons

Resolving the measurement uncertainty paradox in ecological management

A flexible consistent framework for modelling multiple interacting environmental responses to management in space and time

Coupling marine ecosystem state with environmental management and conservation: A risk-based approach

Ratcheting up Rigor in Wildlife Management Decision Making

Adaptive governance and the administrative state: knowledge management for forest planning in the western United States