Abstract:Breast cancer (BC) is one of the main neoplasia affecting women worldwide. Breast conserving surgery (BCS) or modified radical mastectomy (Mx) are both applicable with no difference between patients treated by these surgeries in terms of quality of life, local recurrence rate, and overall survival. The surgical decision today favors the surgeon-patient dialog, in which the patient is involved in the therapeutic decision. Several factors influence the decision-making process. This study aims to investigate these factors in Lebanese women likely to face BC and before being operated on, unlike other studies that targeted patients who had already been operated on. Methods: The authors conducted a study to investigate the factors influencing the choice of breast surgery. To be eligible for this study, participants had to be Lebanese women, with no age limit and willing to participate voluntarily. A questionnaire form was used to collect data related to patient demographics, health, surgery, and relevant factors. Data analysis was performed by statistical tests using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 25) and Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft 365). Significant factors (defined as P<0.05) were than used to determine the factors that influenced women's decision-making. Results: Data from 380 participants were analyzed. The majority of participants were young (41.58% were between 19 and 30 years old), living in Lebanon (93.3%), and had a bachelor's degree or higher (83.95%). Almost half of the women (55.26%) are married and have children (48.95%). Among the participants, 97.89% had no personal history of BC, and 95.79% had not undergone any breast surgery. The majority of participants indicated that their primary care physician and surgeon influenced their decision on the type of surgery they take (56.32 and 61.58%, respectively). Only 18.16% of respondents said they had no preference for Mx over BCS. While the others listed their reasons and concerns for choosing Mx, including: concern about recurrence (40.26%), concern about residual cancer (31.05%). 17.89% of the participants justify the reason for choosing Mx rather than BCS, by the fact that they lack information on BCS. Most of the participants confirmed the importance of clarifying all information about BC and treatment options before being affected by a malignancy (71.84%) of which 92.28% preferred to participate in the next online lectures about this topic. The assumption of equal variance is assumed. Indeed, according to the Levene Test (F=1.354; P<0.05), there is a significant difference between the age categories of the group that prefers Mx (2.08) and the group that does not prefer Mx over BCS (1.77). Based on an independent samples t-test (t(380)=2.200; P<0.05). On the other hand, the preference of Mx over BCS is statistically dependent on the choice of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Indeed, according to the χ2-test, the relationship between the two variables is significant (χ2 (2)=8.345; P<0.05). The 'Phi' statistic measures the intensity of the relationship between the two variables in question (φ=0.148); therefore, the relationship between the preference of Mx rather than BCS and the asking of contralateral prophylactic Mx is strong and significant (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant dependence between the preference of Mx and the other factors studied (P>0.05). Conclusion: BC poses a problem for affected women, especially when they are asked to choose between a Mx or a BCS. Several complex factors affect and influence their decision and lead them to decide. Understanding these factors helps us to properly help these women choose. In this study, the authors demonstrated all the factors that can influence the choice of Lebanese women prospectively, and we stressed the need to explain all the modalities before being diagnosed.

Exploring women's strong preference for women surgeons in breast healthcare

Men surgeons' perceptions of women surgeons: is there a bias against women in surgery?

Societal Preferences for Gender of Surgeons: A Cross-Sectional Study in the General Population of Pakistan

A Cross-Sectional Study of Gender-Specific Influences of Orthopedic Subspecialty Selection

Public Preferences for Surgeon Gender in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Comparison of Male and Female Surgeons' Experiences With Gender Across 5 Qualitative/Quantitative Domains

Perceptions on gender disparity in surgery and surgical leadership: A multicenter mixed methods study

Surgical career choices of medical students in China: does gender bias play a role?

Women in minimally invasive gynecological surgery and endometriosis challenges and overcoming

Where Are the Women in Orthopaedic Surgery?

Does gender affect experiences in the operating room for surgeons and anesthesiologists at a large academic center?

Resident perspectives on the role of gender in operative experience during general surgery residency training: A mixed-methods study

Women Surgeons' Experiences of Interprofessional Workplace Conflict

Factors influencing the decision-making process for breast surgery in women likely to face breast cancer: a cross-sectional study

Association of Surgeon Self-Reported Gender and Surgical Outcomes in Current U.S. Practice

Gender Disparities in Surgical Subspecialties: A CMS Data Analysis

The unspoken reality of gender bias in surgery: A qualitative systematic review

The Gender Divide: The Impact of Surgeon Gender on Surgical Practice Patterns in Urology

Factors That Influence Orthopedic Women Residents' Selection of Adult Reconstruction

Surgical experiences of final-year undergraduates and the impact on their career aspiration stratified by sex/gender

Female Surgeons in Cardiac Surgery: Does the Surgeon's Gender Affect the Outcome of Routine Coronary Artery Bypass Graft and Isolated Aortic Valve Surgery?