Isospin-density-dependent pairing from infinite nuclear matter to finite nuclei
Xu Meng,Shisheng Zhang,Lin Guo,Lisheng Geng,Ligang Cao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.102.064322
IF: 3.199
2020-12-24
Physical Review C
Abstract:The effective isospin-density-dependent pairing interaction (P1) [S. S. Zhang, U. Lombardo, and E. G. Zhao, Sci. Chin. Phys. Mech. Astron. 54, 236 (2011)1674-734810.1007/s11433-010-4211-y] extracted from neutron pairing gaps for S01 in asymmetric nuclear matter calculations [S. S. Zhang, L. G. Cao, U. Lombardo, E. G. Zhao, and S. G. Zhou, Phys. Rev. C 81, 044313 (2010)PRVCAN0556-281310.1103/PhysRevC.81.044313] is employed to study the bulk properties of Ca, Ni, Zr, and Sn isotopes. The odd-even mass (OEM) staggering is calculated by the Skyrme Hartree-Fock plus BCS method (SHF+BCS) with the SkP force. For comparison, we study two other types of isovector effective pairing interactions. One is also extracted from pairing gaps of infinite nuclear matter by the Brueckner-Hartree-Fock (BHF) method but for free spectrum (P2). The other is obtained by fitting the empirical OEM (P3). An isoscalar effective pairing interaction (P4) is also adopted, which is determined by fitting the empirical OEM. We find that interaction P1 can better describe the OEM staggering of Ni, Zr, and Sn isotopes by 14.3%, 41%, and 30.4% compared with interaction P2, in terms of root-mean-square deviations to the empirical OEM, respectively. On the other hand, the performance of P1 and P2 is comparable for Ca isotopes. For Ca and Ni isotopes, P1 behaves similarly to P3, but for Zr isotopes P1 is better than P3 by ≈34%. One may conclude that the isovector pairings are preferred over the isoscalar one for neutron pairings in finite nuclei with the SkP force. It is quite interesting to note that the pairing interaction P1 extracted from nuclear matter calculations can describe pairing gaps of finite nuclei as well as or even better than the interaction P3 directly fitted to finite nuclei. To study the influence from the mean fields on the OEM, we perform the same analysis using the SLy4 and SkI4 forces as well. It turns out that pairing gaps described by these two forces with four pairing interactions are underestimated, so that P2 seems to be better than P1 and is comparable with P3.
physics, nuclear