Abstract:Abstract In this paper, we attempt to compare space syntax with spatial interaction. At one level, these two approaches to urban spatial structure are non-comparable. Space syntax is largely a descriptive technique for visualising spatial relations at the level of connections between places while spatial interaction is a predictive model that forecasts how much travel there will be between places. Space syntax articulates the system in terms of whether or not a physical link, usually at the level of the street, exists while spatial interaction predicts movements between all origins and destinations which are places often anchored in terms of the street network, but which at the level of prediction, assume connections between all places. Space syntax is grounded at a fine spatial scale while spatial interaction defines places as aggregates of activity in larger zones than the scale of the street system. The main output of space syntax is a connectivity matrix of step lengths between streets whereas in spatial interaction, such networks are predetermined, measurable in terms of Euclidean distance or generalised cost of travel, and the output is the volume of travel prior to this being assigned usually to a street network. There is however a fundamental way of relating the implicit network graph of spatial interaction to the explicit planar graph of the street network. We begin by assuming the planar graph of the network is conceived of as a primal problem of spatial interaction while the dual graph linking streets in the planar graph is the graph which is used in space syntax. We exploit this duality and show how we can move easily between spatial interaction as the primal and space syntax as the dual. This is rooted in a more fundamental graph – the bipartite graph which is a list of streets/arcs and their intersections/nodes from which the primal and dual emerge naturally. We explore various accessibility measures and show how they relate and correlate. We then go one step further and consider how various processes of random walking take place in these networks examining the steady states of the primal and dual problems in terms of the likelihood of a random walker visiting any node or street. We thus define primal and dual Markov chains that enable us to generate these probabilities. This provides a basic framework for comparing primal and dual in comparing spatial interaction with space syntax. We illustrate these measures on simple and easy to articulate graphs, extending this to a synthetic network of nearest neighbour links in Greater London based on 699 nodes and 1972 symmetric ‘streets’ between zones. This is a preliminary attack on the problem of linking these two approaches although many challenges remain.

Sestieri of Venice

Ghetto of Venice: Access to the Target Node and the Random Target Access Time

Random Walks Along the Streets and Canals in Compact Cities: Spectral analysis, Dynamical Modularity, Information, and Statistical Mechanics

City Space Syntax as a Complex Network

Urban volumetrics: spatial complexity and wayfinding, extending space syntax to three dimensional space

Intelligibility and First Passage Times In Complex Urban Networks

Quantifying ethnic segregation in cities through random walks

Random Maps with Sociological Flavor

Structural properties of planar graphs of urban street patterns

Scaling and Universality in City Space Syntax: between Zipf and Matthew

Discovering Important Nodes Through Graph Entropy Encoded in Urban Space Syntax

Integrating space syntax with spatial interaction

Shaping ideal cities: the graph representation of the urban utopia

Ranking spaces for predicting human movement in an urban environment

Urban segregation on multilayered transport networks: a random walk approach

Spatial Patterns in Urban Systems

Centrality Measures in Spatial Networks of Urban Streets

Walkability and walking for transport: characterizing the built environment using space syntax

Hypergraphs and City Street Networks