Abstract:Context. Recently, large and homogeneous samples of cataclysmic variables identified by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) were published. In these samples, the famous orbital period gap, which is a dearth of systems in the orbital period range ∼2 − 3 h and the defining feature of most evolutionary models for cataclysmic variables, has been claimed not to be clearly present. If true, this finding would completely change our picture of cataclysmic variable evolution. Aims. In this Letter we focus on potential differences with respect to the orbital period gap between cataclysmic variables in which the magnetic field of the white dwarf is strong enough to connect with that of the donor star, so-called polars, and non-polar cataclysmic variables as the white dwarf magnetic field in polars has been predicted to reduce the strength of angular momentum loss through magnetic braking. Methods. We separated the SDSS I–IV sample of cataclysmic variables into polars and non-polar systems and performed statistical tests to evaluate whether the period distributions are bimodal as predicted by the standard model for cataclysmic variable evolution or not. We also compared the SDSS I–IV period distribution of non-polars to that of other samples of cataclysmic variables. Results. We confirm the existence of a period gap in the SDSS I–IV sample of non-polar cataclysmic variables with > 98% confidence. The boundaries of the orbital period gap are 147 and 191 min, with the lower boundary being different to previously published values (129 min). The orbital period distribution of polars from SDSS I–IV is clearly different and does not show a similar period gap. Conclusions. The SDSS samples as well as previous samples of cataclysmic variables are consistent with the standard theory of cataclysmic variable evolution. Magnetic braking does indeed seem get disrupted around the fully convective boundary, which causes a detached phase during cataclysmic variable evolution. In polars, the white dwarf magnetic field reduces the strength of magnetic braking and consequently the orbital period distribution of polars does not display an equally profound and extended period gap as non-polars. It remains unclear why the breaking rates derived from the rotation of single stars in open clusters favour prescriptions that are unable to explain the orbital period distribution of cataclysmic variables.

SDSS J233325.92+152222.1 and the evolution of intermediate polars

XMM-Newton observations of eleven intermediate polars and possible candidates

Identifying a new intermediate-polar using XMM-Newton and INTEGRAL

Constraining white dwarf mass and magnetic field strength of a new intermediate polar through X-ray observations

X-ray measurement of a high-mass white dwarf and its spin for the intermediate polar IGR J18434-0508

Intermediate polars in low states

CSS1603+19: a low-mass polar near the cataclysmic variable period minimum

SDSS J085414.02+390537.3—A New Asynchronous Polar

Evolution of Spin in the Intermediate Polar CC Sculptoris

SDSS J163030.58+423305.8: A 40 minute Orbital Period Detached White Dwarf Binary

The cataclysmic variable orbital period gap: More evident than ever

SDSS J085414.02+390537.3 -- a new asynchronous polar

A Strange Dwarf Scenario for the Formation of the Peculiar Double White Dwarf Binary SDSS J125733.63+542850.5

Classifying IGR J15038-6021 as a magnetic CV with a massive white dwarf

Nature of the Eclipsing Polar 1RXS J184542.4 483134

A white dwarf binary showing sporadic radio pulses at the orbital period

Long-period Radio Pulsars: Population Study in the Neutron Star and White Dwarf Rotating Dipole Scenarios

He Star Evolutionary Channel to Intermediate-Mass Binary Pulsar PSR J1802-2124

Is T Leonis a superoutbursting intermediate polar?