Ronald F. Webbink
Abstract:Common envelopes form in dynamical time scale mass exchange, when the envelope of a donor star engulfs a much denser companion, and the core of the donor plus the dense companion star spiral inward through this dissipative envelope. As conceived by Paczynski and Ostriker, this process must be responsible for the creation of short-period binaries with degenerate components, and, indeed, it has proven capable of accounting for short-period binaries containing one white dwarf component. However, attempts to reconstruct the evolutionary histories of close double white dwarfs have proven more problematic, and point to the need for enhanced systemic mass loss, either during the close of the first, slow episode of mass transfer that produced the first white dwarf, or during the detached phase preceding the final, common envelope episode. The survival of long-period interacting binaries with massive white dwarfs, such as the recurrent novae T CrB and RS Oph, also presents interpretative difficulties for simple energetic treatments of common envelope evolution. Their existence implies that major terms are missing from usual formulations of the energy budget for common envelope evolution. The most plausible missing energy term is the energy released by recombination in the common envelope, and, indeed, a simple reformulation the energy budget explicitly including recombination resolves this issue.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are some unsolved mysteries in the Common Envelope Evolution (CEE) process, especially the formation mechanism of close double - white - dwarf systems. Specifically, the paper explores the following key issues:
1. **Formation of short - period binary systems**: The paper discusses how to explain the formation of short - period binary systems (especially systems containing degenerate components, such as double - white - dwarf systems) through the CEE process. These systems usually have short orbital periods and small orbital angular momenta, which are difficult to fully match with the traditional energy and angular momentum conservation models.
2. **Explanation of long - period interacting binary systems**: The paper mentions that the existence of some long - period interacting binary systems (such as recurrent novae T CrB and RS Oph) challenges simple energy - handling methods. The existence of these systems implies that some important energy terms may be missing in the CEE process.
3. **Energy budget of CEE**: The paper proposes that an important energy term that may be missing in the CEE process is the recombination energy. By explicitly including the recombination energy in the energy budget, the formation of these systems can be better explained.
4. **Evolutionary history of double - white - dwarf systems**: The paper points out that difficulties are encountered when attempting to reconstruct the evolutionary history of close double - white - dwarf systems. In particular, the mass - transfer process in the first stage (which leads to the formation of the first white dwarf) seems to be inconsistent with the traditional CEE model, and an additional mass - loss or energy - gain mechanism needs to be introduced.
### Specific problem analysis
- **Conservation of energy and angular momentum**:
- Equations (1) to (9) in the paper describe in detail the changes in the total orbital energy and angular momentum of binary systems before and after mass transfer. For example, the initial orbital energy \( E_{\text{orb},i} \) and the final orbital energy \( E_{\text{orb},f} \) are expressed as:
\[
E_{\text{orb},i}=-\frac{G M_1 M_2}{2 A_i}
\]
\[
E_{\text{orb},f}=-\frac{G M_{1c} M_2}{2 A_f}
\]
- where \( M_1 \) and \( M_2 \) are the initial masses, \( M_{1c} \) is the core mass, and \( A_i \) and \( A_f \) are the initial and final orbital semi - major axes, respectively.
- **Role of recombination energy**:
- The paper proposes that the recombination energy may be an important but overlooked energy source in the CEE process. The addition of recombination energy can explain why some long - period interacting binary systems can exist without being unable to sustain due to insufficient energy.
- **Evolutionary path of double - white - dwarf systems**:
- The paper shows, through specific examples (such as V471 Tau), how to use the conservation of energy and angular momentum to infer the evolutionary history of the system. However, for close double - white - dwarf systems, the traditional CEE model has difficulty explaining their formation process, and additional mechanisms, such as slow quasi - conservative mass transfer or stellar wind mass loss, need to be introduced.
### Conclusion
The main purpose of the paper is to explain the formation mechanisms of some observed binary systems by re - examining the energy budget in the CEE process, especially by introducing recombination energy. This new perspective helps to better understand the evolutionary histories of short - period binary systems and long - period interacting binary systems.