Kenji Hamaguchi,Michael F. Corcoran,Theodore Gull,Kazunori Ishibashi,Julian M. Pittard,D. John Hillier,Augusto Damineli,Kris Davidson,Krister E. Nielsen,Gladys Vieira Kober
Abstract:We report the results of an X-ray observing campaign on the massive, evolved star Eta Carinae, concentrating on the 2003 X-ray minimum as seen by the XMM-Newton observatory. These are the first spatially-resolved X-ray monitoring observations of the stellar X-ray spectrum during the minimum. The hard X-ray emission, believed to be associated with the collision of Eta Carinae's wind with the wind from a massive companion star, varied strongly in flux on timescales of days, but not significantly on timescales of hours. The lowest X-ray flux in the 2-10 keV band seen by XMM-Newton was only 0.7% of the maximum seen by RXTE just before the X-ray minimum. The slope of the X-ray continuum above 5 keV did not vary in any observation, which suggests that the electron temperature of the hottest plasma associated with the stellar source did not vary significantly at any phase. Through the minimum, the absorption to the stellar source increased by a factor of 5-10 to NH ~3-4E23 cm-2. The thermal Fe XXV emission line showed significant excesses on both the red and blue sides of the line outside the minimum and exhibited an extreme red excess during the minimum. The Fe fluorescence line at 6.4 keV increased in equivalent width from 100 eV outside the minimum to 200 eV during the minimum. From these observed features, we discuss two possible causes of the X-ray minimum; the eclipse of the X-ray plasma and an intrinsic fading of the X-ray emissivity. The drop in the colliding wind X-ray emission also revealed the presence of an additional X-ray component which exhibited no variation on timescales of weeks to years. This component may be produced by the collision of high speed outflows at v \~1000-2000 km s-1 from Eta Carinae with ambient gas within a few thousand AU from the star.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to define and verify the concept of "No Asymptotic Market Free Lunch" (NAMFL) in large - scale financial markets and link it to the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing (FTAP). Specifically, the author attempts to expand the classical asset - pricing theory by introducing an asymptotic concept of no - market - free - lunch to adapt to large - scale financial markets composed of multiple traditional market models.
### Summary of Main Problems:
1. **Defining NAMFL**: In large - scale financial markets, how to define an asymptotic concept of no - market - free - lunch (NAMFL) so that this concept has a clear economic interpretation and can be applied to the special structure of large - scale financial markets.
2. **Generalization of FTAP**: How to prove the equivalence between NAMFL and the existence of a series of equivalent martingale measures (these measure sequences are bicontinuous with respect to the original probability measure sequences) in large - scale financial markets, thereby generalizing the FTAP in the classical small - scale markets.
3. **Characterization of Different No - Arbitrage Conditions**: How to use NAMFL to characterize various asymptotic no - arbitrage conditions (such as the first - type and second - type no - asymptotic - arbitrage), and explore the relationships between these conditions.
### Key Contributions:
- **Introduction of NAMFL**: The author introduced the NAMFL concept for monotone concave preferences and proved its equivalence to the existence of a bicontinuous martingale measure sequence.
- **New Version of FTAP**: Through NAMFL, the author provided a new version of FTAP applicable to large - scale financial markets, which provides a new perspective for understanding and analyzing the no - arbitrage conditions in large - scale financial markets.
- **Proof of Uniformity**: Proved that the uniform version (NAMFL*) of NAMFL is equivalent to the non - uniform version (NAMFL), thereby providing a theoretical basis for using the more intuitive uniform version.
### Related Formulas:
- **Definition of NAMFL**:
\[
\text{NAMFL}(U)\text{: For each }\varepsilon > 0\text{ and each net }W=(w_{\gamma})_{\gamma\in\Gamma}\text{, where }w_{\gamma}\in D_{\varepsilon,n_{\gamma}}\text{, there exists }u\in U\text{ and a sequence }R_{n}\in P_{n}\text{ such that }(R_{n})\triangleleft\triangleright(P_{n})\text{, for all sequences }(w_{k})\subseteq W:
\]
\[
\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup_{f_{k}\in C_{n_{k}}}E_{R_{n_{k}}}[u(f_{k}-w_{k})]<u(0).
\]
- **Definition of NAMFL***:
\[
\text{NAMFL*}(U_{2})\text{: For each }\varepsilon > 0\text{, there exists }\delta > 0, u\in U_{2}\text{ and a sequence }R_{n}\in P_{n}\text{ such that }(R_{n})\triangleleft\triangleright(P_{n})\text{, for each sequence }w_{n}\in D_{\varepsilon,n}:
\]
\[
\limsup_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup_{f_{n}\in C_{n}}E_{R_{n}}[u(f_{n}-w_{n})]<u(0)-\delta.
\]
Through these definitions and proofs, the author successfully generalizes the classical asset - pricing theory to large - scale financial markets and provides new tools for understanding asymptotic no - arbitrage conditions.