Abstract:Peer Instruction (PI) is a student-centered instructional approach developed at Harvard by Eric Mazur (1997). The method has been welcomed by the science community and adopted by a large number of colleges and universities, due among other reasons to its common sense approach and its documented effectiveness. In PI, the progression of any given class depends on the outcome of real-time student feedback to ConcepTests: multiple-choice conceptual questions. In the early 1990s, students responded to ConcepTests using flashcards showing their answer. Instructors would then estimate the proportion of students holding each alternative conception. A few years later Mazur began using wireless handheld devices - colloquially called clickers- to replace the flashcards. Previous users of clickers in university classrooms had reported benefits such as increased rates of attendance and decreased rates of attrition (Owens et al., 2004; Lopez-Herrejon & Schulman, 2004). This paper empirically measures the specific contribution of clickers to conceptual learning and traditional problem solving skills as compared to low-budget flashcards. Results show that clickers do not provide any learning advantage when compared to flashcards. Nevertheless, clickers offer many advantages from a teaching perspective which should be considered.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to compare the effects of using clickers and using flashcards in the Peer Instruction (PI) teaching method on students' conceptual understanding and traditional problem - solving abilities. Specifically, the author hopes to determine through experimental research whether clickers can promote students' conceptual learning and problem - solving abilities more effectively than low - budget flashcards. To answer this question, the author designed an experiment in which first - semester students were randomly assigned to two groups: one group used clickers for classroom interaction, and the other group used traditional flashcards. The two groups of students were taught under the same course structure and content, and the changes in their conceptual understanding and problem - solving skills were evaluated through the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and final exam scores. The experimental results show that there is no significant difference between the two groups of students using clickers and those using flashcards in terms of both conceptual understanding and problem - solving ability. This indicates that in the Peer Instruction method, clickers do not add extra learning effects, but the author still encourages the use of clickers for the following reasons: 1. Clickers help draw attention to the Peer Instruction method, and many teachers adopt the Peer Instruction method because of this technology. 2. Using clickers can archive students' response data, facilitating subsequent analysis and improvement of question design. 3. Clickers can be used to optimize the quality of peer discussions, for example, by showing pairings of students with different views, thereby improving the effectiveness of the discussion. In conclusion, although clickers provide convenience in terms of technology, they do not increase learning effects by themselves. Therefore, teachers should focus on the Peer Instruction teaching method itself rather than relying too much on specific technological tools.

Peer Instruction: Comparing Clickers to Flashcards

A Campus-Wide Investigation of Clicker Implementation: The Status of Peer Discussion in STEM Classes

The Effects of Clickers With Different Teaching Strategies

Revisiting Clickers: In-Class Questions Followed by At-Home Reflections Are Associated with Higher Student Performance on Related Exam Questions

Socratic Dialogs and Clicker use in an Upper-Division Mechanics Course

Effectiveness of the use of clickers versus group discussion in learning by undergraduate medical students

Evidence for teaching practice: The impact of clickers in a large classroom environment

Using clickers to facilitate interactive engagement activities in a lecture room for improved performance by students

Using Clickers to Address Common Errors and Misconceptions in Statistics

Clickers in the Biology Classroom: Strategies for Writing and Effectively Implementing Clicker Questions That Maximize Student Learning

Research-based implementation of peer instruction: a literature review

A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?

Higher-Order Clicker Questions Engage Students and Prepare Them for Higher-Order Thinking Activities

The impact of clickers instruction on cognitive loads and listening and speaking skills in college English class

PICA: A Data-driven Synthesis of Peer Instruction and Continuous Assessment

Interface and interaction design for an online, asynchronous peer instruction tool

Interactive Peer Instruction Method Applied to Classroom Environments Considering a Learning Engineering Approach to Innovate the Teaching–Learning Process

Beyond Clickers, Next Generation Classroom Response Systems for Organic Chemistry

THE IMPACT OF THE USE OF CLICKER TOOLS IN ACADEMIC CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENTS

Paperclickers: Affordable Solution for Classroom Response Systems

Peer assessment enhances student learning