Abstract:We consider two technical developments of the formalism of continuous-time histories. First, we provide an explicit description of histories of the simple harmonic oscillator on the classical histories phase space, comparing and contrasting the Q, P and Wigner representations; we conclude that a representation based on coherent states is the most appropriate. Second, we demonstrate a generic method for implementing a perturbative approach for interacting theories in the histories formalism, using the quartic anharmonic oscillator. We make use of the identification of the closed-time path (CTP) generating functional with the decoherence functional to develop a perturbative expansion for the latter up to second order in the coupling constant. We consider both configuration space and phase space histories.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve two main problems:
1. **Provide an explicit description of the history of quantum mechanics on the classical phase space**: The author analyzes in detail the different representations (Q, P and Wigner representations) of the simple harmonic oscillator on the classical phase space, and compares the similarities and differences between these representations. Eventually, it is concluded that the representation based on coherent states is the most appropriate. This helps to better understand the behavior of quantum systems in the phase space.
2. **Provide a general method for implementing the perturbation method in the historical formulation for interacting theories**: The author uses the relationship between the closed - time - path (CTP) generating function and the decoherence functional to develop a perturbation expansion method applicable to interacting theories, and illustrates it with the example of a quartic anharmonic oscillator. Specifically, the author derives the expression of the decoherence functional under the second - order approximation of the coupling constant, and calculates it in the configuration space and the phase space respectively.
Through the work in these two aspects, the author not only improves the phase - space description of the history of quantum mechanics, but also shows a general method for dealing with historical theories containing interactions, thus providing a tool for further research on more complex physical systems.
### Formula summary
- **Definition of decoherence functional**:
\[
d(\alpha, \beta)=\text{Tr}[C^\dagger_\alpha \rho_0 C_\beta]
\]
where the class operator \(C_\alpha = \alpha_{t_1}(t_1)\alpha_{t_2}(t_2)\cdots\alpha_{t_n}(t_n)\).
- **Hamiltonian of SHO**:
\[
\hat{H}=\frac{1}{2}\hat{p}^2+\frac{1}{2}\omega^2\hat{q}^2 = \omega\hat{a}^\dagger\hat{a}
\]
- **Limit expression of continuous - time phase - space distribution**:
\[
W_Q[\alpha(\cdot),\alpha^*(\cdot)]=\exp\left\{-|\beta|^2+\beta\alpha^*_n(t_n)+\beta^*\alpha_1 - |\alpha_n|^2+\int_{t_1}^{t_n}dt(\alpha^*(t)\dot{\alpha}(t)+i\omega\alpha^*(t)\alpha(t))\right\}
\]
- **Perturbation expansion of AHO**:
\[
i\tilde{S}[q(\cdot),q'(\cdot)]=i\tilde{S}_0[q(\cdot),q'(\cdot)]-\frac{i\lambda}{4!}\int dt\left(q(t)^4 - q'(t)^4\right)+\mathcal{O}(\lambda^2)
\]
These formulas show how the author solves the above two problems through specific mathematical derivations, thus providing a solid foundation for the development of the historical formulation of quantum mechanics.