Abstract:We have obtained photometry and spectroscopy of 433 z ⩽ 0.08 brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) in a full-sky survey of Abell clusters to construct a BCG sample suitable for probing deviations from the local Hubble flow. The BCG Hubble diagram over 0 < z < 0.08 is consistent to within 2% of the Hubble relation specified by a Ωm = 0.3, Λ = 0.7 cosmology. This sample allows us to explore the structural and photometric properties of BCGs at the present epoch, their location in their hosting galaxy clusters, and the effects of the cluster environment on their structure and evolution. We revisit the Lm–α relation for BCGs, which uses α, the log-slope of the BCG photometric curve of growth, to predict the metric luminosity in an aperture with 14.3 kpc radius, Lm, for use as a distance indicator. Residuals in the relation are 0.27 mag rms. We measure central stellar velocity dispersions, σ, of the BCGs, finding the Faber–Jackson relation to flatten as the metric aperture grows to include an increasing fraction of the total BCG luminosity. A three-parameter “metric plane” relation using α and σ together gives the best prediction of Lm, with 0.21 mag residuals. The distribution of projected spatial offsets, rx of BCGs from the X-ray-defined cluster center is a steep γ = −2.33 power law over 1 < rx < 103 kpc. The median offset is ∼10 kpc, but ∼15% of the BCGs have rx > 100 kpc. The absolute cluster-dispersion normalized BCG peculiar velocity |ΔV1|/σc follows an exponential distribution with scale length 0.39 ± 0.03. Both Lm and α increase with σc. The α parameter is further moderated by both the spatial and velocity offset from the cluster center, with larger α correlated with the proximity of the BCG to the cluster mean velocity or potential center. At the same time, position in the cluster has little effect on Lm. Likewise, residuals from the metric plane show no correlation with either the spatial or velocity offset from the cluster center. The luminosity difference between the BCG and second-ranked galaxy, M2, increases as the peculiar velocity of the BCG within the cluster decreases. Further, when M2 is a close luminosity “rival” of the BCG, the galaxy that is closest to either the velocity or X-ray center of the cluster is most likely to have the larger α. We conclude that the inner portions of the BCGs are formed outside the cluster, but interactions in the heart of the galaxy cluster grow and extend the envelopes of the BCGs.

The Non-Parametric Model for Linking Galaxy Luminosity with Halo/Subhalo Mass: Are First Brightest Galaxies Special?

Halo Model at Its Best: Constraints on Conditional Luminosity Functions from Measured Galaxy Statistics

How special are brightest group and cluster galaxies?

Brightest cluster galaxies are statistically special from <i>z</i>=0.3 to <i>z</i>=1

Linking haloes to galaxies: how many halo properties are needed?

BRIGHTEST CLUSTER GALAXIES AT THE PRESENT EPOCH

Theoretical Predictions of Colors and Metallicity of the Intracluster Light

The Different Growth Pathways of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and the Intra-Cluster Light

Trends in the Globular Cluster Luminosity Function of Early-Type Galaxies

The Hierarchical Growth of Bright Central Galaxies and Intracluster Light as Traced by the Magnitude Gap

The Luminosity Profiles of Brightest Cluster Galaxies

The Galaxy Dark Matter Connection

Photometric Properties and Scaling Relations of Early Type Brightest Cluster Galaxies

Strong Bimodality in the Host Halo Mass of Central Galaxies from Galaxy–galaxy Lensing

Satellite Content and Halo Mass of Galaxy Clusters: Comparison Between Red-Sequence and Halo-Based Optical Cluster Finders

Galaxy Occupation Statistics of Dark Matter Haloes: Observational Results

Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of Clustering of Luminous Red Galaxies

The evolution of luminosity, colour and the mass-to-luminosity ratio of Galactic open clusters: comparison of discrete vs. continuous IMF models

Evolution of the brightest cluster galaxies: the influence of morphology, stellar mass and environment

The Galaxy Content of SDSS Clusters and Groups

Minor Mergers are not enough: The importance of Major Mergers during Brightest Cluster Galaxy assembly