The Non-Parametric Model for Linking Galaxy Luminosity with Halo/Subhalo Mass: Are First Brightest Galaxies Special?

A. Vale,J. P. Ostriker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0701096

2007-01-05

Abstract:We revisit the longstanding question of whether first brightest cluster galaxies are statistically drawn from the same distribution as other cluster galaxies or are "special", using the new non-parametric, empirically based model presented in Vale&Ostriker (2006) for associating galaxy luminosity with halo/subhalo masses. We introduce scatter in galaxy luminosity at fixed halo mass into this model, building a conditional luminosity function (CLF) by considering two possible models: a simple lognormal and a model based on the distribution of concentration in haloes of a given mass. We show that this model naturally allows an identification of halo/subhalo systems with groups and clusters of galaxies, giving rise to a clear central/satellite galaxy distinction. We then use these results to build up the dependence of brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) magnitudes on cluster luminosity, focusing on two statistical indicators, the dispersion in BCG magnitude and the magnitude difference between first and second brightest galaxies. We compare our results with two simple models for BCGs: a statistical hypothesis that the BCGs are drawn from a universal distribution, and a cannibalism scenario merging two galaxies from this distribution. The statistical model is known to fail from work as far back as Tremaine&Richstone (1977). We show that neither the statistical model nor the simplest possibility of cannibalism provide a good match for observations. Our CLF models both give similar results, in good agreement with observations. Specifically, we find <m_1> between -25 and -25.5 in the K-band, sigma(m_1)~0.25 and <Delta_12> between 0.6 and 0.8, for cluster luminosities in the range of 10^12 to 10^13 h^-2 L_sun.

Astrophysics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is related to the properties of the Brightest Cluster Galaxies (BCGs). Specifically, researchers have long been exploring whether BCGs are randomly drawn from the same distribution as other galaxies in the cluster or have special properties. In other words, whether BCGs follow a special distribution independent of the fainter galaxies in the cluster, or they are just extreme values in the same global distribution.

### Main problems:
1. **Statistics or particularity of BCGs**: Are BCGs drawn from the distribution of all galaxies in the cluster in a statistical way, or do they have a special formation mechanism?
2. **Luminosity differences of BCGs**: How does the luminosity of BCGs differ from that of other galaxies? In particular, the luminosity difference between the brightest galaxy and the second - brightest galaxy.
3. **Distribution characteristics of BCGs**: Does the luminosity distribution of BCGs conform to a certain specific statistical distribution (such as Gaussian distribution or log - normal distribution), or does it conform to the Gumbel distribution in extreme value theory?

### Research methods:
To answer these questions, the author uses a new non - parametric model, which is based on the method proposed by Vale & Ostriker (2006) and correlates the luminosity of galaxies with the mass of dark halos/sub - halos. By introducing the scatter of luminosity at a fixed dark halo mass, the Conditional Luminosity Function (CLF) is constructed, and two possible models are considered:
- **Simple log - normal distribution**: Assume that the luminosity distribution is log - normal, but introduce a free parameter to describe the scatter.
- **Model based on halo concentration distribution**: Introduce scatter according to the concentration distribution of halos of a given mass, without introducing additional free parameters.

### Key indicators:
- **Average luminosity of BCGs**: Denoted as \(\langle m_1 \rangle\), which is between - 25 and - 25.5 in the K - band.
- **Standard deviation of BCGs' luminosity**: Denoted as \(\sigma(m_1)\), which is approximately 0.25.
- **Luminosity difference between the brightest galaxy and the second - brightest galaxy**: Denoted as \(\langle\Delta_{12}\rangle\), which is between 0.6 and 0.8.

### Conclusions:
By comparing different models (such as statistical models and simple merger models), the author finds that neither the simple statistical model nor the simplest merger model can well explain the observational results. More realistic merger scenarios and their CLF model can better match the observational data, especially in terms of the luminosity distribution and luminosity differences of BCGs.

### Formula summary:
- **Conditional Luminosity Function (CLF)**:
\[
\phi_{\text{CLF}}(L|M)dL=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}\sigma_L L}\exp\left(-\frac{(\ln[L/L_0(M)]+\sigma^2_{LN}/2)^2}{2\sigma^2_{LN}}\right)dL
\]
where \(L_0(M)\) is the average luminosity of the host object of a given mass \(M\), and \(\sigma_L\) is the standard deviation of the log - normal distribution of luminosity.

- **Fraction of sub - halo mass destroyed**:
\[
f_{\text{dest}}=\frac{m_{\text{dest}}}{M}=\frac{L_{\text{cent}}}{L_{\text{total}}}
\]

Through these analyses, the author concludes that BCGs have special properties and proposes a more reasonable merger scenario to explain the observational data.