Improving a radiative plus collisional energy loss model for application to RHIC and LHC

Simon Wicks,Miklos Gyulassy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/34/8/S141

2007-06-20

Abstract:With the QGP opacity computed perturbatively and with the global entropy constraints imposed by the observed dNch/dy~1000, radiative energy loss alone cannot account for the observed suppression of single non-photonic electrons. Collisional energy loss is comparable in magnitude to radiative loss for both light and heavy jets. Two aspects that significantly affect the collisional energy loss are examined: the role of fluctuations, and the effect of introducing a running QCD coupling as opposed to the fixed alpha_s=0.3 used previously.

Nuclear Theory

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **How to improve the radiation and collision energy loss models in order to better explain the high - energy quark jet quenching phenomenon observed in the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiments**.

Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the following two aspects:

1. **Fluctuations in collision energy loss**:
- The traditional Fokker - Planck formalism assumes that collision energy loss is a continuous process and uses a Gaussian distribution to approximately describe its fluctuations. However, in actual situations, high - energy jets will only experience a finite number of collisions when passing through the quark - gluon plasma (QGP). Therefore, this continuous approximation may be inaccurate.
- The paper explores the energy loss fluctuations in each collision and the influence of the number of collisions. It is found that for light - quark jets, in the case of a small number of collisions, the Gaussian approximation will significantly overestimate the quenching effect, while the influence on bottom - quark jets is smaller.

2. **Introduction of the running QCD coupling constant**:
- Previous studies usually used a fixed QCD coupling constant \(\alpha_s = 0.3\). However, in fact, \(\alpha_s\) varies with the momentum transfer \(Q^2\).
- The paper re - evaluates the influence of introducing the running QCD coupling constant \(\alpha_s(Q^2)\) on the collision energy loss and finds that this will lead to an increase in energy loss, especially in the case of high - energy jets.

Through these improvements, the paper aims to more accurately simulate the quenching process of high - energy jets in QGP, so as to better explain the experimental data, especially the suppression phenomenon of single non - photoelectrons.

### Formula summary

1. **Fluctuations in collision energy loss**:
- Gaussian width formula:
\[
\sigma^2 = 2T\langle \epsilon \rangle
\]
- Probability distribution of longitudinal momentum loss in a single collision:
\[
\frac{dN}{dq_{\parallel}} = \rho L \frac{g^4}{4\pi} C_R C_2 \frac{dA_m E}{E + m} \left[ C_L |\Delta L|^2 + C_T |\Delta T|^2 \right]
\]
where,
\[
C_L = 2 + \frac{1}{E} \left( \omega + \vec{v} \cdot \vec{q} \right) \left( 2 - \frac{\omega}{m} \right), \quad C_T = \left( -\frac{\omega}{m} \right) \left( v^2 - (\vec{v} \cdot \hat{\vec{q}})^2 \right)
\]

2. **Introduction of the running QCD coupling constant**:
- Bjorken - estimated collision energy loss formula:
\[
\frac{dE_{q,g}}{dx} = \left( \frac{2}{3} \pm \frac{1}{2\pi} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{6} n_f \right) \alpha^2 T^2 \ln \left( \frac{4TE}{\mu^2} \right) \right)
\]
- Formula after introducing the running coupling:
\[
\frac{dE_{q,g}}{dx} = \left( \frac{2}{3} \pm \frac{1}{2\pi} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{6} n_f \right) \alpha(Q^2 = 4TE) \alpha(Q^2 = \mu^2) T^2 \ln \left( \frac{4TE}{\mu^2} \right)