Abstract:The random utility maximization model is by far the most adopted framework to estimate consumer choice behavior. However, behavioral economics has provided strong empirical evidence of irrational choice behaviors, such as halo effects, that are incompatible with this framework. Models belonging to the random utility maximization family may therefore not accurately capture such irrational behavior. Hence, more general choice models, overcoming such limitations, have been proposed. However, the flexibility of such models comes at the price of increased risk of overfitting. As such, estimating such models remains a challenge. In this work, we propose an estimation method for the recently proposed generalized stochastic preference choice model, which subsumes the family of random utility maximization models and is capable of capturing halo effects. In particular, we propose a column-generation method to gradually refine the discrete choice model based on partially ranked preference sequences. Extensive computational experiments indicate that our model, explicitly accounting for irrational preferences, can significantly boost the predictive accuracy on both synthetic and real-world data instances. Summary of Contribution: In this work, we propose an estimation method for the recently proposed generalized stochastic preference choice model, which subsumes the family of random utility maximization models and is capable of capturing halo effects. Specifically, we show how to use partially ranked preferences to efficiently model rational and irrational customer types from transaction data. Our estimation procedure is based on column generation, where relevant customer types are efficiently extracted by expanding a treelike data structure containing the customer behaviors. Furthermore, we propose a new dominance rule among customer types whose effect is to prioritize low orders of interactions among products. An extensive set of experiments assesses the predictive accuracy of the proposed approach by comparing it against rank-based methods with only rational preferences and with more general benchmarks from the literature. Our results show that accounting for irrational preferences can boost predictive accuracy by 12.5% on average when tested on a real-world data set from a large chain of grocery and drug stores.

Identification of a rational inattention discrete choice model

Identification and Estimation of A Rational Inattention Discrete Choice Model with Bayesian Persuasion

Identification with Posterior-Separable Information Costs

Rational Inattention as an Empirical Framework for Discrete Choice and Consumer-Welfare Evaluation

Identification and Estimation of Discrete Choice Models with Unobserved Choice Sets

Estimation in dynamic discrete choice panel data model with partial identification

Attention Overload

Discrete Choice under Risk with Limited Consideration

On the Estimation of Discrete Choice Models to Capture Irrational Customer Behaviors

A neural basis of rational inattention models: consistency of cognitive cost with the mutual information criterion

Choice Models and Permutation Invariance: Demand Estimation in Differentiated Products Markets

Estimation of Discrete Choice Models: A Machine Learning Approach

A Note on Estimating Network Dependence in a Discrete Choice Model

Estimating a Behavioral New Keynesian Model

Rational inattention in games: experimental evidence

New possibilities in identification of binary choice models with fixed effects

A Comment on "Estimating Dynamic Discrete Choice Models with Hyperbolic Discounting" by Hanming Fang and Yang Wang

A model of discrete choice based on reinforcement learning under short-term memory

Partial identification in nonseparable binary response models with endogenous regressors

A Random Attention Model

Weak Identification in Discrete Choice Models