Temperature sensitivity of plant litter decomposition rate in China's forests

Shanshan Song,Qiong Cai,C. Ji,Yuhao Feng,Jianxiao Zhu,Fan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ECS2.3541
2021-06-01
Ecosphere
Abstract:. The decomposition of litter from forest tree species is a fundamental process in the carbon (C) cycle of terrestrial ecosystems and is closely related to ongoing climate change. However, the spatial distribution of the forest litter decomposition rate ( k ) and its potential response to changing air temperature (temperature sensitivity) remain poorly understood. Here, we estimated the spatial pattern of forest plant k values in China by performing a random forest model based on 433 standardized k values from 124 published studies. Nine potential predictors, including climate-related factors, vegetation characteristics, and soil physical and chemical factors, were considered in the model. The results of spatial extrapolation indicated that the average k value for China ’ s forests was 0.53, and the mean annual temperature (MAT) was the most important factor. We also mapped the spatial pattern of the temperature sensitivity of the k value ( Q 10 ) by using a moving window method. We found that the Q 10 values had considerable variation (from 0.05 to 11.68, 95% con fi dence interval, CI) across forest types and regions. The Q 10 values were lower in the warmer regions (primarily in the sub-tropical evergreen forests) and higher in the semi-humid regions (pri-marily in the temperate deciduous forests and boreal Larix forests) than those in the other regions of China. However, the Q 10 values of the broadleaved forests were higher than those of coniferous forests. These results suggest that the temperature sensitivity of the litter decomposition rate will decline under the ongoing global warming. Changing patterns of precipitation will also affect not only the forest litter decomposition rate but also its temperature sensitivity. the k values (a), relationships between the k values and climate-related factors (b – d), vegetation characteristics (e, f) and soil physical and chemical factors (g – j), and the relative importance of these predictors ( k ). We used the impurity reduction values calculated from the split variables of all tree nodes to compare the importance of the different factors. Different letters (A and B) denote signi fi cant differences at P < 0.05 across different litter types via one-way analysis of variance. Abbreviations are MAT, mean annual temperature; MAP, mean annual precipitation; NDVI, normalized difference vegetation index; SOC, soil organic carbon.
Environmental Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?