Abstract:Motivated by Carbon Emissions Trading Schemes, Treasury Auctions, and Procurement Auctions, which all involve the auctioning of homogeneous multiple units, we consider the problem of learning how to bid in repeated multi-unit pay-as-bid auctions. In each of these auctions, a large number of (identical) items are to be allocated to the largest submitted bids, where the price of each of the winning bids is equal to the bid itself. The problem of learning how to bid in pay-as-bid auctions is challenging due to the combinatorial nature of the action space. We overcome this challenge by focusing on the offline setting, where the bidder optimizes their vector of bids while only having access to the past submitted bids by other bidders. We show that the optimal solution to the offline problem can be obtained using a polynomial time dynamic programming (DP) scheme. We leverage the structure of the DP scheme to design online learning algorithms with polynomial time and space complexity under full information and bandit feedback settings. We achieve an upper bound on regret of $O(M\sqrt{T\log |\mathcal{B}|})$ and $O(M\sqrt{|\mathcal{B}|T\log |\mathcal{B}|})$ respectively, where $M$ is the number of units demanded by the bidder, $T$ is the total number of auctions, and $|\mathcal{B}|$ is the size of the discretized bid space. We accompany these results with a regret lower bound, which match the linear dependency in $M$. Our numerical results suggest that when all agents behave according to our proposed no regret learning algorithms, the resulting market dynamics mainly converge to a welfare maximizing equilibrium where bidders submit uniform bids. Lastly, our experiments demonstrate that the pay-as-bid auction consistently generates significantly higher revenue compared to its popular alternative, the uniform price auction.

Sequential elimination in multi-stage all-pay auctions

A Note on Sequential Auctions with Multi-Unit Demand.

I Want to Tell You? Maximizing Revenue in First-Price Two-Stage Auctions

Strategic behavior in dynamic auctions

License Bidding – Sunk Costs that Matter

Optimistic-Conservative Bidding in Sequential Auctions

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Sales, Intensity of Competition and Uncertainty

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Auctions, Intensity of Competition and Uncertainty

Bidding in Multi-Unit Auctions under Limited Information

Limits of Efficiency in Sequential Auctions

Simultaneous Vs. Sequential Sales: Bidder Competition and Supply Uncertainty

Simultaneous Versus Sequential All-Pay Auctions: an Experimental Study

All-pay Auctions with Endogenous Bid Timing: an Experimental Study

Performance analysis of sequential Internet auction systems comparing with fixed price case

Contests with Sequential Entry and Incomplete Information

Auctions versus sequential mechanisms when resale is allowed

Going, going, gone: competitive decision-making in Dutch auctions

Vickrey Auctions with Sequential and Costly Participation

Prior-free Dynamic Mechanism Design With Limited Liability

Learning in Repeated Multi-Unit Pay-As-Bid Auctions

Optimal Strategies in Sequential Bidding