Abstract:In spite of decades of static-analysis research behind developing precise whole-program dataflow analyses, languages that use just-in-time (JIT) compilers suffer from the imprecision of resource-bound analyses local to the scope of compilation. Recent promising approaches bridge this gap by splitting the analysis into two phases: a static phase that identifies interprocedural dependencies across program elements, and a dynamic phase that resolves those dependencies to generate final analysis results. Though this approach is capable of generating precise analysis results without incurring analysis cost in JIT compilers, such "staged analyses" lack a theoretical backing. In particular, it is unclear if one could transform a general whole-program analysis (that resolves dependencies across all program elements) to a staged one that involves evaluation of statically generated partial results later. Similarly, it would be interesting if one could generate "partial-result evaluators" in a way that can also be used to argue about their correctness. In this paper, we propose a novel model of partial analysis that addresses all these points for staged (static + dynamic) compilation systems, based on the classic theory of partial evaluation. We begin by highlighting how partial evaluation and Futamura projections are used to generate specialized program interpreters. We then describe partial analysis as the process of evaluating dependencies across program elements with respect to the statically available parts of a program, resulting into partial results . Next, we devise a strategy (by deriving a novel notion of AM projections from Futamura projections) to statically generate specialized evaluators that can process partial results using dynamic dependencies, during JIT compilation. Later, we use our proposed model to straightforwardly establish the correctness and precision properties of the idea of staging, independent of the analysis under consideration. We finally extend our model to soundly handle callbacks made from Java libraries to applications. We demonstrate the applicability of our model by showcasing examples from non-trivial Java program analyses, implementing the pipeline for one of them, and also discussing future possibilities to extend the same. We believe that our contributions in formulating this theory of partial analysis will significantly extend the usage of existing partial analyzers, as well as promote the design of new ones, for and even beyond Java.

Towards Fully Declarative Program Analysis via Source Code Transformation

Datalog with First-Class Facts

From Logic to Functional Logic Programs

A Survey of the Proof-Theoretic Foundations of Logic Programming

A Higher-Order Abstract Syntax Approach to the Verified Compilation of Functional Programs

Dataflow Analysis With Prophecy and History Variables

On Feasibility of Declarative Diagnosis

Reversible Language Extensions and their Application in Debugging

Partial program analysis for staged compilation systems

An Algebraic Framework for Compositional Program Analysis

Bring Your Own Data Structures to Datalog

Reasoner = Logical Calculus + Rule Engine

Logic As Programming

Symbolic Computation and Automated Reasoning for Program Analysis

Proving Functional Program Equivalence via Directed Lemma Synthesis

Scaling Synthetic Logical Reasoning Datasets with Context-Sensitive Declarative Grammars

Abstracting Abstract Machines: A Systematic Approach to Higher-Order Program Analysis

Synthetic Programming Elicitation for Text-to-Code in Very Low-Resource Programming and Formal Languages

The Prolog Debugger and Declarative Programming. Examples

Symbolic Computation via Program Transformation

A Usage-Aware Sequent Calculus for Differential Dynamic Logic