Abstract:Since its inauguration, ChiNext has gone through three time periods with two different regulation regimes and three different sets of listing day trading restrictions. This paper studies the impact of regulation regimes and listing day trading restrictions on the initial return of ChiNext IPOs. We hypothesize that the initial return of a ChiNext IPO contains the issuers intrinsic value and the investors overreaction. The intrinsic value is represented by the IPOs 21st day return (monthly return), and the difference between the monthly and initial returns (intramonth return) is a proxy of the overreaction. We find that all significant variables for all three returns in all three time periods fall into four categories: pre-listing demand, post-listing demand, market condition and pre-listing issuer value. We observe stark contrasts among variable categories for each of the returns in the three time periods, which reveals an evolution of the investors behavior with regard to the progression of regulation regimes. Based on our findings, we argue that the differences among the levels and determinants of initial return, monthly return (intrinsic value) and intramonth return (overreaction) in different time periods can be largely explained by regulation regime changes along two dimensions: 1) approval vs. registration and 2) listing day trading curbs and return limits. We find that IPO pricing is demand-driven under the approval regime, but value-driven under the registration regime. We further compare the impact of regulation regime changes on ChiNext IPO pricing practice, and propose a future research plan on ChiNext IPO pricing efficiency with policy implication.

The greater the investor attention, the better the post-IPO performance? A view of pre-IPO and post-IPO investor attention

IPO Offer Price Regulation, Financial Reporting Quality, and IPO Overpricing

Individual Investor's Limited Attention and IPO Performance

Does Investor Attention Affect Stock Trading and Returns? Evidence from Publicly Listed Firms in China

The long-run performance of initial public offerings and its determinants: the case of China

Initial Public Offering, Corporate Innovation and Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China

The impacts of registration regime implementation on IPO pricing efficiency

Analysis of the Impact of Investor Sentiment on IPO Underpricing: Perspective from GEM Manufacturing Firms

The Impact of Regulation Regime Changes on ChiNext IPOs: Effects of 2013 and 2020 Reforms on Pricing and Overreaction

Retail investor attention and IPO prices with a pre-IPO market

The Effects of Individual Investors' Attention on Stock Returns: Evidence from the Chinext Market

IPO Underpricing and Limited Attention: Theory and Evidence

Are Initial Public Offerings Significant to Firm Performance in an Emerging Stock Market? Evidence from China

Do Chinese IPOs Really Underperform in the Long Run?

Research on the Impact of Investor Sentiment on IPO Underpricing of GEM

The underpricing and long-term performance of Chinese IPOs listed on the Hong Kong exchange

Can Market-oriented Reform Improve Pricing Efficiency in China? Evidence from Registration-based IPO System

Underpricing and Operating Performance of Chinese B-Share Initial Public Offerings

The Influence of the Media on Government Decisions: Evidence from IPOs in China

The Long-Run Performance of the Initial Public Offerings after the Book-Building in Chinese Stock Markets