Abstract:PurposeThis paper aims to study how state ownership influences the innovation process in terms of allocating resources toward searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economic value. On one hand, deep pockets of the state provide slack resources that may facilitate risk taking and innovation. On the other hand, soft budgets can create incentive problems and dampen the efficient use of resources. The authors suggest how accounting for competitive context can disentangle these countervailing forces.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a panel of over 240,000 Chinese firms over the years 2004–2008. The broad sample and period afforded substantial variability in terms of state ownership within and across firms. The authors use a two-stage model and a within-firm (i.e. fixed-effects) design, controlling for all time-invariant firm characteristics and the problematic unobserved heterogeneity that can often lead to erroneous inferences. Furthermore, the relatively short window limits the likelihood of time-varying unobserved firm characteristics biasing the empirical results.FindingsThe authors found that private-sector competition has the opposite effect on the relationship between state ownership and the second step of the innovation process. In industries where there is robust private-sector competition, state ownership diminishes the firm’s ability to convert R&D efforts into economic value. Private-sector competition competes away any advantages state-owned firms may have in terms of developing or accessing the complementary resources needed for commercialization. Ultimately, the inefficiencies of state ownership in terms of relatively undisciplined selection and monitoring of R&D activities outweigh any potential resource advantages derived from state ownership.Originality/valueThe state remains a prominent player in many economies throughout the world. The authors explored how state ownership of firms influences the resources they expend in searching out new solutions, and their success in converting such resources into economically valuable new products and services. State ownership has potentially countervailing effects on innovation. The authors disentangle these countervailing effects through consideration of how accounting for competitive context could determine whether the beneficial effects of state ownership dominate its detrimental effects for both searching for new solutions and converting these efforts into economically valuable new products. With a focus of market competition as an external force that drives the difference in innovation between SOEs and the private-sector, this study serves as a parallel effort to Jiaet al.(2019) who investigate the joint effect of public and corporate governance on SOEs’ innovation performance, and Zhouet al.(2017) who concern the balance of the institution and efficiency logics on the comparative advantage of SOEs over privately owned enterprises in innovation performance.

Governing innovation-driven development under state entrepreneurialism in China

The effects of corporate governance and ownership on the innovation performance of Chinese SMEs

The Effects of Corporate Governance on Innovation in Chinese Firms ∗

State-Firm Strategic Coordination and Technological Innovation in Shanghai and Shenzhen: A Comparative Study

Assembling Mega-Urban Projects Through State-Guided Governance Innovation: the Development of Lingang in Shanghai

State Restructuring and Urban Innovation Development in Post-reform China: Shanghai’s Innovation Action in Review

An evolutionary game analysis of incentive of industrial parks, government support and enterprise innovation willingness in China

Government innovation policy and higher education: the case of Shenzhen, China

State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics

The “Entrepreneurial State” in “Creative Industry Cluster” Development in Shanghai

Green state entrepreneurialism: Building the park city in Chengdu, China

Stepwise Transition of Urban Entrepreneurialism in Cross-Boundary Statecraft: A Qualitative Study of an Enclave Industrial Park in Zhejiang Province, China

State Ownership, Firm Innovation and the Moderating Role of Private-Sector Competition: the Case of China

University-Industry-Government Relations in China: An emergent national system of innovations

Managed social innovation: The case of government-sponsored venture philanthropy in Shanghai

State governance and technological innovation in emerging economies: State-owned enterprise restructuration and institutional logic dissonance in China’s high-speed train sector

Location-Oriented Policies in China: Establishment of State-Level Development Zones and Enterprise Innovation Behaviors

Planning centrality, market instruments: Governing Chinese urban transformation under state entrepreneurialism

Reconceiving China's urban economic transition through symbiotic state-firm dynamics: An integrated perspective from urban governance and global production networks

Governance and the China Innovation Economy

The Making of an Innovative Region from a Centrally Planned Economy: Institutional Evolution in Zhongguancun Science Park in Beijing