Humane genomics education can reduce racism

Brian M Donovan,Monica Weindling,Jamie Amemiya,Brae Salazar,Dennis Lee,Awais Syed,Molly Stuhlsatz,Jeffrey Snowden,Brian M. Donovan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi7895

IF: 56.9

2024-02-23

Science

Abstract:Moving instruction "beyond Mendel" can counter inaccurate, essentialist views

multidisciplinary sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The sociopolitical in human genetics education

R G Duncan,R Krishnamoorthy,U Harms,M Haskel-Ittah,K Kampourakis,N Gericke,M Hammann,M Jimenez-Aleixandre,R H Nehm,M J Reiss,A Yarden,R. G. Duncan,R. Krishnamoorthy,U. Harms,M. Haskel-Ittah,K. Kampourakis,N. Gericke,M. Hammann,M. Jimenez-Aleixandre,R. H. Nehm,M. J. Reiss,A. Yarden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi8227

IF: 56.9

2024-02-23

Science

Abstract:Education must go beyond only countering essentialist and deterministic views of genetics

multidisciplinary sciences
Typological thinking in human genomics research contributes to the production and prominence of scientific racism

Kevin A. Bird,Jedidiah Carlson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1345631

IF: 3.7

2024-02-20

Frontiers in Genetics

Abstract:Public genomic datasets like the 1000 Genomes project (1KGP), Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP), and the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study are valuable public resources that facilitate scientific advancements in biology and enhance the scientific and economic impact of federally funded research projects. Regrettably, these datasets have often been developed and studied in ways that propagate outdated racialized and typological thinking, leading to fallacious reasoning among some readers that social and health disparities among the so-called races are due in part to innate biological differences between them. We highlight how this framing has set the stage for the racist exploitation of these datasets in two ways: First, we discuss the use of public biomedical datasets in studies that claim support for innate genetic differences in intelligence and other social outcomes between the groups identified as races. We further highlight recent instances of this which involve unauthorized access, use, and dissemination of public datasets. Second, we discuss the memification, use of simple figures meant for quick dissemination among lay audiences, of population genetic data to argue for a biological basis for purported human racial groups. We close with recommendations for scientists, to preempt the exploitation and misuse of their data, and for funding agencies, to better enforce violations of data use agreements.

genetics & heredity
Advancing genomics to improve health equity

Ebony B. Madden,Lucia A. Hindorff,Vence L. Bonham,Tabia Henry Akintobi,Esteban G. Burchard,Kellan E. Baker,Rene L. Begay,John D. Carpten,Nancy J. Cox,Valentina Di Francesco,Denise A. Dillard,Faith E. Fletcher,Stephanie M. Fullerton,Nanibaa’ A. Garrison,Catherine M. Hammack-Aviran,Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka,James E. K. Hildreth,Carol R. Horowitz,Chanita A. Hughes Halbert,Michael Inouye,Amber Jackson,Latrice G. Landry,Rick A. Kittles,Jeff T. Leek,Nita A. Limdi,Nicole C. Lockhart,Elizabeth O. Ofili,Eliseo J. Pérez-Stable,Maya Sabatello,Loren Saulsberry,Lorjetta E. Schools,Jennifer L. Troyer,Benjamin S. Wilfond,Genevieve L. Wojcik,Judy H. Cho,Sandra S.-J. Lee,Eric D. Green

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01711-z

IF: 30.8

2024-04-30

Nature Genetics

Abstract:Health equity is the state in which everyone has fair and just opportunities to attain their highest level of health. The field of human genomics has fallen short in increasing health equity, largely because the diversity of the human population has been inadequately reflected among participants of genomics research. This lack of diversity leads to disparities that can have scientific and clinical consequences. Achieving health equity related to genomics will require greater effort in addressing inequities within the field. As part of the commitment of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) to advancing health equity, it convened experts in genomics and health equity research to make recommendations and performed a review of current literature to identify the landscape of gaps and opportunities at the interface between human genomics and health equity research. This Perspective describes these findings and examines health equity within the context of human genomics and genomic medicine.

genetics & heredity
Changing the paradigm from 'race' to human genome variation

Charmaine D M Royal,Georgia M Dunston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1454

IF: 30.8

2004-10-26

Nature Genetics

Abstract:Knowledge from the Human Genome Project and research on human genome variation increasingly challenges the applicability of the term 'race' to human population groups, raising questions about the validity of inferences made about 'race' in the biomedical and scientific literature. Despite the acknowledged contradictions in contemporary science, population-based genetic variation is continually used to explain differences in health between 'racial' and 'ethnic' groups. In this commentary we posit that resolution of apparent paradoxes in relating biology to 'race' and genetics requires thinking 'outside of the box'.

genetics & heredity
Incorporating multiracial and multiethnic experiences into genetic counseling practice and research: A necessary opportunity

Chenery Lowe,Justin Gomez‐Stafford,Daphne O. Martschenko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1976

2024-10-09

Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract:The conflation of race and genetic ancestry can have harmful consequences. Biological conceptualizations of race have long been used to justify inequities and distract from social structures that afford opportunities to some that are unjustly denied to others. Despite recent efforts within the scientific community to distinguish between the sociopolitical constructs of race and ethnicity and the biological constructs of genetic ancestry and genetic similarity, their conflation continues to influence genomic research and its translation into clinical care. One overlooked aspect of this problematic conflation is the extent to which discrete monoracial and monoethnic categorization systems persist and perpetuate unequal benefit‐sharing in the clinical translation of genomic technologies. In genetic service delivery, reliance on discrete racial and ethnic categories undermines the clinical translation of genomic technologies for large segments of the global population. For multiracial and multiethnic individuals, who have complex identities that defy discrete categorization systems, the potential benefits of genomic discoveries are especially elusive. Scholars have recently begun to call for the inclusion of multiracial, multiethnic, and admixed individuals in race, ethnicity, and ancestry frameworks in genetics and genomics. However, little work has been done to explore and address the unique challenges and opportunities posed by multiracial/multiethnic individuals in genetic counseling specifically. We discuss how conceptualizing diversity along discrete racial and ethnic lines perpetuates inequitable patient care and limits efforts to increase inclusion and belonging within genetic counseling. Moreover, we argue that ongoing efforts to mitigate racial inequity must actively challenge the paradigm of monoracial and monoethnic categories to accomplish their goal.

genetics & heredity,social sciences, biomedical,health policy & services
CCR5 and Biological Complexity: The Need for Data Integration and Educational Materials to Address Genetic/Biological Reductionism at the Interface of Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications

Jacob Bauss,Michele Morris,Rama Shankar,Rosemary Olivero,Leah N. Buck,Cynthia L. Stenger,David Hinds,Joshua Mills,Alexandra Eby,Joseph W. Zagorski,Caitlin Smith,Sara Cline,Nicholas L. Hartog,Bin Chen,John Huss,Joseph A. Carcillo,Surender Rajasekaran,Caleb P. Bupp,Jeremy W. Prokop

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.790041

IF: 7.3

2021-12-02

Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract:In the age of genomics, public understanding of complex scientific knowledge is critical. To combat reductionistic views, it is necessary to generate and organize educational material and data that keep pace with advances in genomics. The view that CCR5 is solely the receptor for HIV gave rise to demand to remove the gene in patients to create host HIV resistance, underestimating the broader roles and complex genetic inheritance of CCR5. A program aimed at providing research projects to undergraduates, known as CODE, has been expanded to build educational material for genes such as CCR5 in a rapid approach, exposing students and trainees to large bioinformatics databases and previous experiments for broader data to challenge commitment to biological reductionism. Our students organize expression databases, query environmental responses, assess genetic factors, generate protein models/dynamics, and profile evolutionary insights into a protein such as CCR5. The knowledgebase generated in the initiative opens the door for public educational information and tools (molecular videos, 3D printed models, and handouts), classroom materials, and strategy for future genetic ideas that can be distributed in formal, semiformal, and informal educational environments. This work highlights that many factors are missing from the reductionist view of CCR5, including the role of missense variants or expression of CCR5 with neurological phenotypes and the role of CCR5 and the delta32 variant in complex critical care patients with sepsis. When connected to genomic stories in the news, these tools offer critically needed Ethical, Legal, and Social Implication (ELSI) education to combat biological reductionism.

immunology
Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics.

Kevin A. Bird,John P. Jackson,Andrew S. Winston

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001228

IF: 16.358

2024-07-23

American Psychologist

Abstract:Although the American Psychological Association has taken a strong antiracism stance, scientific racism continues to be published in psychology journals and scholarly books. Recent articles claim that the folk categories of race are genetically meaningful divisions and that evolved genetic differences among races and nations are important for explaining immutable differences in cognitive ability, educational attainment, crime, sexual behavior, and wealth; all claims that are opposed by a strong scientific consensus to the contrary. These claims remain a serious source of harm through the naturalization of inequality and through support for the work of racial extremists. Contemporary "racial hereditarian research" claims to rest on modern genetics and evolutionary biology and to draw on their methods, such as genome-wide association studies. These new arguments fail to meet the evidentiary and ethical standards of these disciplines for the study of human variation. If psychology adopted standards from genetics and evolutionary biology, the current racial hereditarian work would be ineligible for publication. Actions that the American Psychological Association can take to deal with scientific racism are described. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

psychology, multidisciplinary
Mind the gap: how multiracial individuals get left behind when we talk about race, ethnicity, and ancestry in genomic research

Daphne O. Martschenko,Hannah Wand,Jennifer L. Young,Genevieve L. Wojcik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.00027

2022-04-30

Abstract:It is widely acknowledged that there is a diversity problem in genomics stemming from the vast underrepresentation of non-European genetic ancestry populations. While many challenges exist to address this gap, a major complicating factor is the misalignment between (1) how society defines and labels individuals; (2) how populations are defined for research; and (3) how research findings are translated to benefit human health. Recent conversations to address the lack of clarity in terminology in genomics have largely focused on ontologies that acknowledge the difference between genetic ancestry and race. Yet, these ontological frameworks for ancestry often follow the subjective discretization of people, normalized by historical racial categories; this perpetuates exclusion at the expense of inclusion. In order to make the benefits of genomics research accessible to all, standards around race, ethnicity, and genetic ancestry must deliberately and explicitly address multiracial, genetically admixed individuals who make salient the limitations of discrete categorization in genomics and society. Starting with the need to clarify terminology, we outline current practices in genomic research and translation that fail those who are 'binned' for failing to fit into a specific bin. We conclude by offering concrete solutions for future research in order to share the benefits of genomics research with the full human population.

Other Quantitative Biology
Getting a head start: the importance of personal genetics education in high schools

Johnny T Kung,Marnie E Gelbart

Abstract:With advances in sequencing technology, widespread and affordable genome sequencing will soon be a reality. However, studies suggest that "genetic literacy" of the general public is inadequate to prepare our society for this unprecedented access to our genetic information. As the current generation of high school students will come of age in an era when personal genetic information is increasingly utilized in health care, it is of vital importance to ensure these students understand the genetic concepts necessary to make informed medical decisions. These concepts include not only basic scientific knowledge, but also considerations of the ethical, legal, and social issues that will arise in the age of personal genomics. In this article, we review the current state of genetics education, highlight issues that we believe need to be addressed in a comprehensive genetics education curriculum, and describe our education efforts at the Harvard Medical School-based Personal Genetics Education Project.
Reflections on diversity, equity, and inclusion in genetic counseling education

Annie K Bao,Amanda L Bergner,Gayun Chan-Smutko,Janelle Villiers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1242

Abstract:Through self-reflection, self-education, and with a learning mindset each of us has embarked on a personal path to understand the impact of racism in our personal and professional lives. This personal work is ongoing, though it was through our individual paths that led us to engage in dialogue on race and racism at the 38th National Society of Genetic Counselors Annual Conference. We initially did not know each other; however, we were drawn by a mutual desire to further the conversation and sought connection with each other after the Conversations Around Diversity Platform Presentations. Through sustained, open dialogue we created a brave space for sharing our emotional and intellectual responses to the conference. Through this dialogue and through written reflections, we recognized an emboldened urgency to author a joint reflection on our shared responsibility as genetic counseling training program leaders to use our privilege in service to our students and future students. We have the evidence that we are not a diverse profession. We have more evidence now than we did before that our profession performs poorly with regards to inclusivity. Our inability to acknowledge, address, and discuss racism and other forms of oppression is damaging to each of us individually and as a group of professionals. We owe it to ourselves, our students, our patients, and colleagues to name our learned biases and behaviors, own them and interrupt them.
Implications of the genomic revolution for education research and policy

Tim T. Morris,Stephanie Hinke,Lindsey Pike,Neil R. Ingram,George Davey Smith,Marcus R. Munafò,Neil M. Davies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3784

2022-04-12

British Educational Research Journal

Abstract:Research at the intersection of social science and genomics, 'sociogenomics', is transforming our understanding of the interplay between genomics, individual outcomes and society. It has interesting and maybe unexpected implications for education research and policy. Here we review the growing sociogenomics literature and discuss its implications for educational researchers and policymakers. We cover key concepts and methods in genomic research into educational outcomes, how genomic data can be used to investigate social or environmental effects, the methodological strengths and limitations of genomic data relative to other observational social data, the role of intergenerational transmission and potential policy implications. The increasing availability of genomic data in studies can produce a wealth of new evidence for education research. This may provide opportunities for disentangling the environmental and genomic factors that influence educational outcomes and identifying potential mechanisms for intervention.

education & educational research
Compassion and equity‐focused clinical genomics training for health professional learners

Taylor J. Berninger,Ramya M. Rajagopalan,Cinnamon S. Bloss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1874

2024-02-18

Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract:There remains an urgent need for expanded genomics training in undergraduate medical education, especially as genetic and genomic assessments become increasingly important in primary care and routine clinical practice across specialties. Physician trainees continue to report feeling poorly prepared to provide effective consultation or interpretation of genomic test results. Here we report on the development, pilot implementation, and evaluation of an elective offering for pre‐clinical medical students called the Sanford Precision Health Scholars Immersive Learning Experience (PHS), which was designed leveraging genetic counseling expertise as one means to address this need. This 9‐week course, piloted in Fall 2021 at UC San Diego, afforded students the opportunity to build technical skills and competencies in clinical genomics while identifying, addressing, and engaging with pervasive health disparities in genomics. Interactive exercises focused students' learning on strategies for empathic and compassionate patient interactions while supporting the application of concepts and knowledge to future practice. Upon completion of the course, participants reported increases in confidence related to skills required for clinical genomics practice. Drawing on learnings from this pilot implementation, recommendations for refining the program include deepening pedagogical engagement with ethical issues, expanding the offering to trainees across health professions, including pharmacy students, and incorporating an optional experiential learning component. Educational offerings, like PHS, that are designed with the input of genetic counseling expertise may ease pressures on the genetic counseling profession by building a more genomic‐literate healthcare workforce that can better support efforts to expand access for patients.

genetics & heredity,social sciences, biomedical,health policy & services
Employing effective recruitment and retention strategies to engage a diverse pediatric population in genomics research

Michelle A. Ramos,Katherine E. Bonini,Laura Scarimbolo,Nicole R. Kelly,Beverly Insel,Sabrina A. Suckiel,Kaitlyn Brown,Miranda Di Biase,Katie M. Gallagher,Jessenia Lopez,Karla López Aguiñiga,Priya N. Marathe,Estefany Maria,Jacqueline A. Odgis,Jessica E. Rodriguez,Michelle A. Rodriguez,Nairovylex Ruiz,Monisha Sebastin,Nicole M. Yelton,Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles,Melvin Gertner,Irma Laguerre,Thomas V. McDonald,Patricia E. McGoldrick,Mimsie Robinson,Arye Rubinstein,Lisa H. Shulman,Trinisha Williams,Steven M. Wolf,Elissa G. Yozawitz,Randi E. Zinberg,Noura S. Abul-Husn,Laurie J. Bauman,George A. Diaz,Bart S. Ferket,John M. Greally,Vaidehi Jobanputra,Bruce D. Gelb,Eimear E. Kenny,Melissa P. Wasserstein,Carol R. Horowitz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.015

2024-12-07

The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract:Novel approaches are needed for the enhancement of sociodemographic and ancestral diversity in genomics research. We describe an integrated set of community-engaged, data-driven approaches resulting in the successful recruitment and retention of children who are non-White and from medically underserved areas in genomic sequencing studies and provide recommendations for their broader adoption.

genetics & heredity
Diversifying the genomic data science research community

The Genomic Data Science Community Network

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.276496.121

IF: 9.438

2022-07-28

Genome Research

Abstract:Over the past 20 years, the explosion of genomic data collection and the cloud computing revolution have made computational and data science research accessible to anyone with a web browser and an internet connection. However, students at institutions with limited resources have received relatively little exposure to curricula or professional development opportunities that lead to careers in genomic data science. To broaden participation in genomics research, the scientific community needs to support these programs in local education and research at underserved institutions (UIs). These include community colleges, historically Black colleges and universities, Hispanic-serving institutions, and tribal colleges and universities that support ethnically, racially, and socioeconomically underrepresented students in the United States. We have formed the Genomic Data Science Community Network to support students, faculty, and their networks to identify opportunities and broaden access to genomic data science. These opportunities include expanding access to infrastructure and data, providing UI faculty development opportunities, strengthening collaborations among faculty, recognizing UI teaching and research excellence, fostering student awareness, developing modular and open-source resources, expanding course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), building curriculum, supporting student professional development and research, and removing financial barriers through funding programs and collaborator support.

genetics & heredity,biochemistry & molecular biology,biotechnology & applied microbiology
Teaching genetics with integrative thoughts of conservation biology

Jian-Qing Lin,Shao-Pan Ye,Shu-Qi Wang,Hong Du

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16288/j.yczz.24-127

Abstract:Biodiversity losses along with the exponential growth of global human population and human-provoked over-exploitation of natural resources. Genetic factors played an important role in the conservation of endangered species. Conservation genetics is a cross-field disciplinary of genetics and conservation biology. The course of conservation genetics is not available in colleges and universities, and the course of genetics does not directly reflect the content of biological conservation. We have taught genetics with integrative thoughts of conservation biology. In the form of case studies, we have integrated recent advances of research and technology in the relevant fields into the genetics classroom. As a result, we improved the undergraduates' motivation and interest in active learning, provoked the mutual promotion of "basic knowledge of genetics, awareness of ecological protection, and cultivate interdisciplinary thinking", and set up the groundwork for cultivating interdisciplinary talents who not only master solid basic knowledge, but also have the concept of ecological civilization.
Living in a Genetic World: How Learning About Interethnic Genetic Similarities and Differences Affects Peace and Conflict

Sasha Y Kimel,Rowell Huesmann,Jonas R Kunst,Eran Halperin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216642196

Abstract:Information about the degree of one's genetic overlap with ethnic outgroups has been emphasized in genocides, is frequently learned about through media reporting, and is increasingly being accessed via personal genetic testing services. However, the consequence of learning about whether your own ethnic group is either genetically related to or genetically distinct from a disliked ethnic group remains unknown. Across four experiments, using diverse samples, measures and contexts, we demonstrate that altering perceptions of genetic overlap between groups in conflict--in this case Arabs and Jews--impacts factors that are directly related to interethnic hostility (e.g., aggressive behaviors, support of conflict-related policies). Our findings indicate that learning about the genetic difference between oneself and an ethnic outgroup may contribute to the promotion of violence, whereas learning about the similarities may be a vital step toward fostering peace in some contexts. Possible interventions and implications are discussed.
Community Collaboration in Public Health Genetic Literacy: Co-Designing Educational Resources for Equitable Genomics Research and Practice

Juhi Salunke,Grace Byfield,Sabrina N. Powell,Daniel Torres,Grace Leon-Lozano,Jahnelle Jackson,Andreas K. Orphanides,Jonathan Shaw,Thomas Owens,Jonathan S. Berg,Elizabeth Branch,Lennin Caro,Stefanija Giric,Julianne M. O'Daniel,Bradford C. Powell,Ken Ray,Megan C. Roberts,Carla Robinson,Samantha Schilling,Nicole Shaw,Erin Song,Margaret Waltz,Ann Katherine M. Foreman,Kimberly Foss,Laura V. Milko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.24.24307892

2024-05-27

Abstract:Introduction Unequal representation in genetic and genomic research is due to various factors including historically inequitable and unjust institutional research practices, potential mistrust of biomedical research among underrepresented populations, and lack of access to or awareness of research opportunities. Facilitating sustainable dialogue between diverse communities and genetic researchers can cultivate trusting, bidirectional relationships, potentially encouraging greater participation in research. Herein, we describe the co-creation of public health educational materials and dissemination plans. Methods We describe co-creation by genetics clinicians, researchers, and community members of Genetics and Genomics Educational modules. These modules are aimed at enhancing genetic literacy with a goal to facilitate informed decision-making regarding genetic research and health services. We used Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability, which is grounded in Dissemination and Implementation science, and the Fit to Context process framework to guide the process. This approach ensures the public health context and diverse audience for the modules are considered throughout their development. Additionally, it ensures that broader goals such as dissemination, equity, and sustainability are integrated from the outset, fostering long-term impact and effectiveness. Conclusion This article offers an evidence-based template for adoption or adaptation by other community-engaged groups, aimed at bolstering equity and sustainability in the development of health care interventions, with an emphasis on accessible public health literacy. The co-creation of both materials and dissemination plans between researchers and community members may improve the cultural appropriateness and relevance of public health genetics campaigns. Ongoing research is needed to assess the impact on receptiveness and participation.
More than a token photo: humanizing scientists enhances student engagement

Robin A. Costello,Emily P. Driessen,Melissa K. Kjelvik,Elizabeth H. Schultheis,Rachel M. Youngblood,Ash T. Zemenick,Marjorie G. Weber,Cissy J. Ballen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.577791

2024-01-31

Abstract:Highlighting scientists from historically excluded groups in educational materials increases student engagement in STEM. However, which specific elements of these educational materials maximize their impact remains untested, leaving educators guessing how to best highlight counter-stereotypical scientists in their classrooms. We tested the effects of including visual and humanizing descriptions of scientists featured in quantitative biology activities on over 3,700 students across 36 undergraduate institutions. We found that including humanizing information about counter-stereotypical scientists increased the extent to which students related to those scientists, which in turn translated to higher student engagement. Students who shared one or more excluded identity(s) with the featured scientists related most strongly. Our findings demonstrate the importance of humanizing counter-stereotypical scientists in classrooms, beyond simply adding a photo to increase representation.

Scientific Communication and Education
Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern

Maya Sabatello,Eric Juengst

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1012

Abstract:Since the inception of large-scale human genome research, there has been much caution about the risks of exacerbating a number of socially dangerous attitudes linked to human genetics. These attitudes are usually labeled with one of a family of genetic or genomic "isms" or "ations" such as "genetic essentialism," "genetic determinism," "genetic reductionism," "geneticization," "genetic stigmatization," and "genetic discrimination." The psychosocial processes these terms refer to are taken to exacerbate several ills that are similarly labeled, from medical racism and psychological fatalism to economic exploitation and social exclusion. But as genomic information becomes more familiar in clinical and research settings as well as other life activities, do we need to continue to worry so much about this family of attitudes and their impact on existing problems? In genomics, the underlying anxiety has been that disclosure of genomic information will trigger a series of (seemingly unavoidable) negative responses that will affect individuals, their families, and their communities at large. The fundamental social challenges that hyperbolic genomic messaging, low genomic literacy, and "folk biology" help sustain remain to be addressed. If we hope to break the cycle of genomic isms and ations, we will have to get better at resisting overinterpretations of the relevance that genomics has for people's future potentials, ancestral vulnerabilities, community memberships, and ethnic affiliations.
The genomic case against genetic determinism

Gene E. Robinson,Rina Bliss,Matthew E. Hudson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002510

IF: 9.8

2024-02-29

PLoS Biology

Abstract:Animal studies reveal that the molecular wiring of the brain can be altered by heredity, the environment, and their interaction. A deeper molecular understanding of these interactions could be a potent antidote to societal concerns of genetic determinism for human behavior, but this requires a paradigm that extends beyond traditional genome-wide association study (GWAS).

biochemistry & molecular biology,biology

Humane genomics education can reduce racism

The sociopolitical in human genetics education

Typological thinking in human genomics research contributes to the production and prominence of scientific racism

Advancing genomics to improve health equity

Changing the paradigm from 'race' to human genome variation

Incorporating multiracial and multiethnic experiences into genetic counseling practice and research: A necessary opportunity

CCR5 and Biological Complexity: The Need for Data Integration and Educational Materials to Address Genetic/Biological Reductionism at the Interface of Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications

Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics.

Mind the gap: how multiracial individuals get left behind when we talk about race, ethnicity, and ancestry in genomic research

Getting a head start: the importance of personal genetics education in high schools

Reflections on diversity, equity, and inclusion in genetic counseling education

Implications of the genomic revolution for education research and policy

Compassion and equity‐focused clinical genomics training for health professional learners

Employing effective recruitment and retention strategies to engage a diverse pediatric population in genomics research

Diversifying the genomic data science research community

Teaching genetics with integrative thoughts of conservation biology

Living in a Genetic World: How Learning About Interethnic Genetic Similarities and Differences Affects Peace and Conflict

Community Collaboration in Public Health Genetic Literacy: Co-Designing Educational Resources for Equitable Genomics Research and Practice

More than a token photo: humanizing scientists enhances student engagement

Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern

The genomic case against genetic determinism