Abstract:Introduction: Treatment for pediatric solid tumors is often intense and multidisciplinary and can create a substantial financial burden for families. Assessing these burdens, termed the financial toxicity of treatment, can be difficult. Using Wilms tumor as an example, we evaluated crowdfunding campaigns in an attempt to better understand the impact of economic and logistic challenges associated with pediatric solid tumor care and identify features associated with successful fundraising with this method. Methods: We used a webscraping algorithm to identify crowdfunding campaigns on GoFundMe.com for pediatric patients with Wilms tumor in the United States. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis to describe the patients and families seeking crowdfunding support for cancer care. After fundraizing information was extracted using the webscraping algorithm, each fundraiser was verified and examined by two independent reviewers to assess demographic, qualitative, disease, and treatment variables. Successful fundraisers, defined as those meeting stated financial goals, were compared to unsuccessful campaigns to identify variables associated with successful crowdfunding campaigns. Results: We identified 603 children with Wilms tumor and an associated crowdfunding campaign. The median age was 4 y. The majority lived in two-parent households (68.5%). Patients mentioned siblings in 35.5% of fundraisers. While motivations for crowdfunding varied, hardships endured by families included loss of employment (52.2%), need for childcare for other children (9.8%), direct costs of care [co-payments, insurance, pharmaceuticals, out-of-pocket care costs, etc.] (80.9%), indirect costs associated with seeking care [transportation, parking, lodging, lost opportunity cost, etc.] (56.2%), and need for relocation to pursue complex cancer care (6.8%). Disease characteristics in this cohort were limited to self-reports by families. However, fundraisers mentioned disease characteristics, including tumor stage (47.6%), size (11.4%), positive nodal status (9.6%), metastatic disease (3.6%), pathology (11.8%), upstaging (4.6%), and disease recurrence (8.6%). No individually examined demographic, support, disease, or hardship-related factors varied significantly between successful and unsuccessful crowdfunding campaigns (all P > 0.05). However, successful campaigns requested less money ($11,783.25 successful versus $22,442.2 unsuccessful, <0.001), received more money ($16,409.5 successful vs 7427.4 unsuccessful, P < 0.001), and solicited larger donor numbers (170.3 successful versus 86.3 unsuccessful, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Families whose children undergo multimodal cancer care have significant expenses and burdens and can use crowdfunding to support their costs. Careful consideration of the financial and logistic strains associated with pediatric solid tumor treatment, including thorough analysis of crowdfunding sites, may support better understanding of nonclinical burdens, supporting therapeutic relationships and patient outcomes.

LGBTQ+ inequity in crowdfunding cancer costs: The influence of online reach and LGBTQ+ state policy

Exploring Online Crowdfunding for Cancer-Related Costs Among LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus) Cancer Survivors: Integration of Community-Engaged and Technology-Based Methodologies

Inequalities in Crowdfunding for Transgender Health Care

Material, Psychological, and Behavioral Financial Hardship Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Cancer Survivors in the United States

Characteristics of Online Crowdfunding Campaigns for Urological Cancers in the United States

Association of Neighborhood Deprivation Index With Success in Cancer Care Crowdfunding

Investigating Racial Disparities in Cancer Crowdfunding: A Comprehensive Study of Medical GoFundMe Campaigns

A cross-sectional study of social inequities in medical crowdfunding campaigns in the United States

Online Crowdfunding for Urologic Cancer Care

An Analysis of Transgender Crowdfunding in the Context of State-Led Anti-Transgender Legislation

Racial and gender disparities among highly successful medical crowdfunding campaigns

Chronic Health Conditions, Disability, and Physical and Cognitive Limitations Among LGBTQ+ Cancer Survivors

A Comparison of Online Medical Crowdfunding in Canada, the UK, and the US

LGBTQ+ cancer: priority or lip service? A qualitative content analysis of LGBTQ+ considerations in U.S. state, jurisdiction, and tribal comprehensive cancer control plans

Producing a worthy illness: Personal crowdfunding amidst financial crisis

Understanding and Addressing LGBTQ+ Cancer Health Disparities

International medical tourism of US cancer patients for alternative cancer treatments: Financial, demographic, and clinical profiles of online crowdfunding campaigns

The Success of Cancer Crowdfunding Campaigns: Project and Text Analysis

A critical analysis of trans-visibility through online medical crowdfunding

Lesbian and bisexual breast cancer survivors' post-treatment resource needs

Using Crowdfunding Campaigns to Examine Financial Toxicity and Logistical Burdens Facing Families of Children With Wilms Tumor