Abstract:To properly repair and maintain implants, which are bone tissue implants that replace natural tooth roots, it is crucial to accurately identify their brand and specification. Deep learning has demonstrated outstanding capabilities in analysis, such as image identification and classification, by learning the inherent rules and degrees of representation of data models. The purpose of this study is to evaluate deep learning algorithms and their supporting application software for their ability to recognize and categorize three dimensional (3D) Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images of dental implants. By using CBCT technology, the 3D imaging data of 27 implants of various sizes and brands were obtained. Following manual processing, the data were transformed into a data set that had 13,500 two-dimensional data. Nine deep learning algorithms including GoogleNet, InceptionResNetV2, InceptionV3, ResNet50, ResNet50V2, ResNet101, ResNet101V2, ResNet152 and ResNet152V2 were used to perform the data. Accuracy rates, confusion matrix, ROC curve, AUC, number of model parameters and training times were used to assess the efficacy of these algorithms. These 9 deep learning algorithms achieved training accuracy rates of 100%, 99.3%, 89.3%, 99.2%, 99.1%, 99.5%, 99.4%, 99.5%, 98.9%, test accuracy rates of 98.3%, 97.5%, 94.8%, 85.4%, 92.5%, 80.7%, 93.6%, 93.2%, 99.3%, area under the curve (AUC) values of 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00, 1.00. When used to identify implants, all nine algorithms perform satisfactorily, with ResNet152V2 achieving the highest test accuracy, classification accuracy, confusion matrix area under the curve, and receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve area. The results showed that the ResNet152V2 has the best classification effect on identifying implants. The artificial intelligence identification system and application software based on this algorithm can efficiently and accurately identify the brands and specifications of 27 classified implants through processed 3D CBCT images in vitro, with high stability and low recognition cost.

Deep Learning For Odontogenic Tumors' Classification.

Deep learning applied to the histopathological diagnosis of ameloblastomas and ameloblastic carcinomas

Diagnosing oral and maxillofacial diseases using deep learning

Automatic segmentation of ameloblastoma on ct images using deep learning with limited data

Deep Learning For Salivary Gland Tumor Classification.

Automatic classification and segmentation of multiclass jaw lesions in cone-beam CT using deep learning

Deep Learning-Based Multiclass Instance Segmentation for Dental Lesion Detection

Differential diagnosis of ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst by machine learning of panoramic radiographs

Statistical validation of a deep learning algorithm for dental anomaly detection in intraoral radiographs using paired data

Application of Deep Learning in Differential Diagnosis of Ameloblastoma and Odontogenic Keratocyst Based on Panoramic Radiographs

Clinically Applicable System For 3D Teeth Segmentation in Intraoral Scans using Deep Learning

Classification of mandibular molar furcation involvement in periapical radiographs by deep learning

Feasibility study of ResNet‐50 in the distinction of intraoral neural tumors using histopathological images

Optimizing and Visualizing Deep Learning for Benign/Malignant Classification in Breast Tumors

Deep Learning for Size and Microscope Feature Extraction and Classification in Oral Cancer: Enhanced Convolution Neural Network

Application of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dentistry Occlusion Classification

Classification using deep learning neural networks for brain tumors

Oral squamous cell detection using deep learning

Deep Learning-Assisted Segmentation and Classification of Brain Tumor Types on Magnetic Resonance and Surgical Microscope Images

The preliminary in vitro study and application of deep learning algorithm in cone beam computed tomography image implant recognition

Performance of deep learning technology for evaluation of positioning quality in periapical radiography of the maxillary canine