Quantum Game Theory and Open Access Publishing

Matthias Hanauske,Steffen Bernius,Berndt Dugall
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2007.04.012
2006-12-24
Abstract:The digital revolution of the information age and in particular the sweeping changes of scientific communication brought about by computing and novel communication technology, potentiate global, high grade scientific information for free. The arXiv for example is the leading scientific communication platform, mainly for mathematics and physics, where everyone in the world has free access on. While in some scientific disciplines the open access way is successfully realized, other disciplines (e.g. humanities and social sciences) dwell on the traditional path, even though many scientists belonging to these communities approve the open access principle. In this paper we try to explain these different publication patterns by using a game theoretical approach. Based on the assumption, that the main goal of scientists is the maximization of their reputation, we model different possible game settings, namely a zero sum game, the prisoners' dilemma case and a version of the stag hunt game, that show the dilemma of scientists belonging to ''non-open access communities''. From an individual perspective, they have no incentive to deviate from the Nash Equilibrium of traditional publishing. By extending the model using the quantum game theory approach it can be shown, that if the strength of entanglement exceeds a certain value, the scientists will overcome the dilemma and terminate to publish only traditionally in all three settings.
Physics and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the paper attempts to solve This paper aims to explain why there are significant differences in the acceptance of Open Access (OA) publishing among different disciplines in the field of scientific publishing. Specifically, although many scientists support the principles of open access, not all disciplines actively adopt this model. For example, researchers in physics and mathematics widely use open platforms such as arXiv, while other disciplines such as the humanities and social sciences still mainly rely on traditional publishing methods. To explain this phenomenon, the authors introduce the method of game theory and assume that the main goal of scientists is to maximize their reputations. By constructing different game models, including zero - sum games, the prisoner's dilemma, and the stag - hunt game, the authors explore the dilemmas that scientists face when choosing whether to adopt open access. In particular, they extend these classic game models and introduce quantum game theory to show how scientists can overcome the dilemmas in the traditional publishing model when quantum strategies are allowed. ### Summary of main problems 1. **Why do different disciplines have different levels of acceptance of open access?** 2. **What dilemmas do scientists face when choosing whether to adopt open access?** 3. **Can quantum game theory provide a solution to make scientists more inclined to choose open access?** Through the answers to these questions, the authors hope to reveal the obstacles to the promotion of the open - access publishing model in different disciplines and explore possible solutions.